vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Tamron

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and versatility, Tamron wins on size.

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers superior versatility and advanced features, making it the better choice for serious photographers, while the Tamron lens is a budget-friendly option for casual use.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Versatility

Canon lens covers a wider zoom range.

Image Stabilization

Canon lens has built-in Optical Image Stabilization.

Autofocus

Canon lens features a smooth STM motor for quiet autofocus.

Why Tamron is better

Price

Tamron lens is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Tamron lens is lighter and more compact.

Macro Capability

Tamron lens offers a 1:2 maximum magnification.

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
Tamron
72

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Tamron
Focal Length24-105mm24mm
Aperturef/4-7.1f/2.8
Image StabilizationYesNo
Max Magnification1:21:2
Motor TypeSTMOSD

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Tamron

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is a versatile option suitable for a range of photography styles. Priced at $476.95, this lens offers a wide zoom range from wide-angle to short-telephoto perspectives, making it ideal for travel, street photography, and casual video work. With a compact design, it is easy to carry, which is a significant advantage for photographers on the go. The built-in Optical Image Stabilizer provides up to five stops of correction, enhancing image sharpness in low-light conditions or at longer focal lengths. This lens also features a smooth and quiet STM motor for autofocus, making it an excellent choice for both photography and video recording.

Overview of the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens is a compact and lightweight option priced at $199.00, making it about 58% cheaper than the Canon RF lens. This lens is designed for Sony full-frame and APS-C E-mount mirrorless cameras, offering a wide-angle perspective that captures expansive landscapes and city scenes. The lens boasts a 1:2 maximum magnification ratio, allowing for detailed macro-style shots, with a minimum object distance of just 4.7 inches. Its moisture-resistant construction and fluorine coating make it suitable for outdoor photography, ensuring durability under various conditions.

Image Stabilization Comparison

When it comes to image stabilization, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens excels with its Optical Image Stabilizer, providing up to five stops of correction. This feature significantly benefits handheld shooting in low light, making it easier to achieve sharp images without a tripod. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm lens does not include built-in stabilization, which may be a drawback for users who frequently shoot in challenging lighting conditions. Therefore, if image stabilization is a top priority, the Canon lens clearly stands out in this category.

Autofocus Performance

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a smooth and quiet STM motor for autofocus, which is highly beneficial for video recording, as it allows for natural focus transitions without distracting noise. This lens also includes full-time manual focus override, providing more control during shooting. On the other hand, while the Tamron 24mm lens offers decent autofocus capabilities, it does not specifically highlight any advanced autofocus technology. Photographers who prioritize smooth autofocus performance, especially for video work, may find the Canon lens to be the superior choice.

Versatility and Use Cases

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is designed for versatility, covering a wide range of focal lengths that make it suitable for various photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and even close-up shots. Its variable maximum aperture allows for more creative flexibility in different shooting situations. Meanwhile, the Tamron 24mm lens, with its fixed focal length, is tailored more for wide-angle photography. While it excels in capturing landscapes and cityscapes, it may not be as adaptable for diverse scenarios compared to the Canon lens. Therefore, for photographers seeking flexibility, the Canon lens offers a broader range of applications.

Build Quality and Design

In terms of build quality, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is designed for everyday use, featuring a compact and lightweight form that is easy to carry. It includes a configurable Control Ring for quick adjustments to exposure settings, enhancing usability. The Tamron 24mm lens is also compact and lightweight, designed for easy portability during all-day shooting. Additionally, it includes moisture-resistant construction and a dirt-resistant fluorine coating, making it a robust option for outdoor photography. Both lenses offer excellent designs, but the Canon lens provides more advanced user features that may appeal to a broader audience.

Price and Value

With a price of $476.95, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is significantly more expensive than the Tamron 24mm lens, which retails for $199.00. This difference of about $277.95 may influence budget-conscious buyers. However, the Canon lens offers a wider zoom range, image stabilization, and advanced autofocus capabilities, which could justify the higher price for many photographers. In contrast, those looking for a budget-friendly option with solid performance may find the Tamron lens more appealing, especially for casual photography without the need for extensive versatility.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens depends on your specific photography needs. If you require versatility, advanced image stabilization, and superior autofocus performance, the Canon lens is the better option despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a lightweight, budget-friendly lens primarily for wide-angle shots, the Tamron lens is an excellent choice. Each lens has its unique strengths, making them suitable for different types of photographers.