vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 28-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on max aperture and magnification, Tamron 28- wins on focal range and length.

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is a more affordable and versatile option, while the Tamron 28-75mm excels in low-light performance and autofocus speed.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Price

Canon is about 36% cheaper

Versatility

Broader focal length range

Weight

Lighter for travel

Why Tamron 28- is better

Aperture

Constant f/2.8 for low light

Autofocus

Faster VXD linear motor

Build Quality

Includes fluorine coating

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
75
Tamron 28-
85

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Tamron 28-
BrandCanonTamron
Price$476.95$749.00
Image StabilizationYesNo
Macro Focus1:21:2.7
Warranty1 Year6 Years

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Tamron 28-

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm and Tamron 28-75mm

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens is priced at $476.95, while the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 is significantly higher at $749.00, making the Canon lens about 36% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different photography needs, with the Canon focusing on versatility and the Tamron emphasizing optical performance and low-light capabilities. Understanding their features will help photographers choose the right lens for their shooting style.

Build Quality and Design

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens boasts a compact and lightweight design, perfect for travel and everyday use. Weighing less than the Tamron lens, it offers a more comfortable option for extended shooting sessions. In contrast, the Tamron 28-75mm lens, while also compact at 4.7 inches long, weighs 19.4 ounces. This additional weight can be a consideration for photographers seeking portability. Both lenses feature a moisture-resistant construction, but the Tamron also includes a fluorine coating, enhancing durability and ease of cleaning.

Focal Length and Versatility

With a focal length range of 24-105mm, the Canon RF lens provides a broader zoom range compared to the Tamron’s 28-75mm. This makes the Canon more versatile for various photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. The Canon lens's ability to cover wide-angle to short-telephoto perspectives allows photographers to switch between different compositions without changing lenses. Conversely, the Tamron's 28-75mm range is better suited for those who primarily shoot in the standard zoom range, offering a consistent f/2.8 aperture throughout, which is ideal for low-light settings.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The Tamron 28-75mm lens features a constant f/2.8 aperture, providing superior low-light performance and depth of field control compared to the variable f/4-7.1 aperture of the Canon RF lens. This makes the Tamron a better choice for shooting in dim conditions or for achieving a more pronounced bokeh effect. Photographers who frequently work in challenging lighting situations will find the Tamron's aperture advantageous, despite its higher price. The Canon lens, while less capable in low light, still offers good performance for everyday scenarios.

Autofocus System

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens employs a smooth STM stepping motor for quiet and precise autofocus, making it suitable for both photography and video recording. This feature is particularly beneficial for vloggers who need unobtrusive focus transitions. The Tamron 28-75mm lens, on the other hand, utilizes a VXD linear motor for high-speed and high-precision autofocus. This rapid focus is essential for capturing fast-moving subjects, making the Tamron a strong candidate for action photography. Both autofocus systems have their strengths, depending on the user's specific needs.

Close-Up Capability

When it comes to close-up photography, both lenses offer unique advantages. The Canon RF lens features a dedicated Center Macro Focus position that allows for a maximum magnification of 1:2, ideal for capturing small subjects in detail. In contrast, the Tamron lens achieves a minimum object distance of just 7.1 inches at the wide end, with a maximum magnification of 1:2.7. This allows for creative close-ups but may not provide the same level of detail as the Canon's macro capabilities. Photographers focused on detail-oriented work may prefer the Canon for its macro functionality.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the Canon RF 24-105mm lens at $476.95 and the Tamron 28-75mm lens at $749.00 is significant, with the Canon being about 36% cheaper. This price point makes the Canon an attractive option for budget-conscious photographers who still want a versatile lens. The higher cost of the Tamron may be justified for those who prioritize its faster aperture and superior build quality, but for everyday use, the Canon offers excellent value.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens and the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 hinges on individual photography needs. The Canon lens is more affordable and versatile, with a broader focal range suitable for various shooting situations. In contrast, the Tamron lens excels in low light and autofocus performance, making it an excellent choice for specialized applications. Photographers should weigh the importance of price versus features to determine which lens best fits their style and requirements.