Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 35-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on weight and size, Tamron 35- wins on aperture and autofocus.
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers excellent value and versatility for everyday photography, while the Tamron 35-150mm lens excels in low-light performance and portrait capabilities.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Price
Canon lens is significantly cheaper.
Portability
Canon lens is lighter and more compact.
Versatility
Canon lens covers a wide range of photography styles.
Why Tamron 35- is better
Aperture
Tamron lens has a faster F2-2.8 aperture.
Autofocus
Tamron lens features high-speed VXD autofocus.
Optical Quality
Tamron lens provides superior depth-of-field control.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Tamron 35- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 35-150mm |
| Max Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/2-2.8 |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus Type | STM | VXD |
| Minimum Focus | 0.5m | 0.33m |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is a versatile standard zoom lens that serves a variety of photography needs. Priced at $476.95, it provides a wide-angle to short-telephoto range, ideal for everyday photography, travel, and casual video work. The lens features a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that offers up to five stops of correction, which helps reduce camera shake during handheld shooting in low-light conditions. Furthermore, its STM stepping motor ensures smooth and quiet autofocus performance, making it suitable for both stills and video recording.
Overview of the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD
The Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD lens, retailing at $1,499.00, is targeted towards both travel and portrait photography enthusiasts. This lens boasts a fast aperture of F2-2.8, making it the world's first zoom lens with such specifications for Sony E-Mount cameras. It offers outstanding optical performance throughout its focal range and features a VXD linear motor for high-speed and high-precision autofocus. With a minimum focusing distance of 13 inches at the wide end, it allows photographers to capture detailed close-up shots, expanding creative possibilities in various shooting scenarios.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is significantly more budget-friendly, priced at $476.95, compared to the Tamron lens, which costs $1,499.00. This makes the Canon lens about 68% cheaper than its Tamron counterpart. For photographers who are looking for a reliable standard zoom without breaking the bank, the Canon RF 24-105mm offers an excellent value proposition. Conversely, the Tamron lens, while more expensive, delivers a unique aperture range and advanced features, which may justify the higher price tag for serious enthusiasts and professionals.
Versatility for Different Photography Styles
When it comes to versatility, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is particularly well-suited for a range of photography styles, from landscape to portrait to casual video. Its flexible zoom range allows photographers to transition seamlessly between different subjects without needing to change lenses, making it ideal for travel. On the other hand, the Tamron 35-150mm lens offers an even broader focal range, making it exceptional for portraiture and event photography, particularly in low-light situations where its fast aperture excels. Each lens has strengths that cater to different styles, with the Canon lens being more compact and lightweight for everyday use.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus systems of both lenses are designed to meet the needs of modern photographers. The Canon RF 24-105mm uses an STM stepping motor that ensures smooth and quiet autofocus, which is beneficial for video recording and candid photography. In contrast, the Tamron lens is equipped with a VXD linear motor, providing high-speed and high-precision autofocus, which is particularly advantageous for capturing fast-moving subjects. While both lenses deliver reliable autofocus performance, the Tamron lens offers a slight edge in speed and precision, making it well-suited for professional use.
Optical Quality
The optical performance of both lenses is impressive, but they cater to different needs. The Canon RF 24-105mm features a built-in Optical Image Stabilizer that enhances sharpness and provides smoother video footage by reducing camera shake. This feature is particularly useful for handheld shooting in various lighting conditions. The Tamron 35-150mm lens, with its fast F2-2.8 aperture, allows for exceptional depth-of-field control and creates beautiful background bokeh, which is preferred by portrait photographers. Therefore, while both lenses excel in their optical quality, the choice depends on whether one prioritizes stabilization or low-light performance.
Build Quality and Portability
Portability is a key factor for many photographers, especially those who travel frequently. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is lightweight and compact, making it easy to carry during long shooting sessions. Its design is user-friendly, with intuitive controls, including a configurable Control Ring for quick adjustments. Conversely, the Tamron 35-150mm lens is heavier, weighing 41.1 ounces, which may make it less ideal for travel. However, its robust build quality and features may appeal to professionals who prioritize durability and performance over weight.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD depends largely on your specific photography needs and budget. If you are looking for a versatile lens for everyday shooting and travel, the Canon lens offers excellent value and portability at $476.95. However, if you require a lens with superior low-light capabilities and are willing to invest more for its fast aperture and enhanced autofocus, the Tamron lens is a worthy consideration at $1,499. Each lens brings unique strengths to the table, making them suitable for different types of photographers.

