Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 70-
Updated July 2026 — Tamron 70- leads on weight and length.
The Canon RF 24-105mm is a versatile and budget-friendly option, while the Tamron 70-180mm excels in low-light performance and telephoto capabilities.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $476.95.
Weight
Canon is lighter, making it easier to carry.
Versatility
Canon offers a broader zoom range for everyday use.
Why Tamron 70- is better
Aperture
Tamron has a constant f/2.8 aperture for better low-light performance.
Autofocus
Tamron features high-speed VXD autofocus for fast-moving subjects.
Build Quality
Tamron has moisture-resistant construction for outdoor durability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Tamron 70- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $476.95 | $999.00 |
| Max Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/2.8 |
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 70-180mm |
| Image Stabilization | 5 stops | VC |
| Autofocus Type | STM | VXD |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens is priced at $476.95, making it about 48% cheaper than the Tamron 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2, which retails for $999.00. For budget-conscious photographers, the Canon lens offers a more accessible entry point into high-quality photography gear. While the price difference is significant, it reflects the varying features and capabilities of each lens. The Canon lens targets versatile everyday shooting, while the Tamron lens, with its telephoto range and faster aperture, caters to more specialized needs.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, both lenses offer compact and practical setups. The Canon RF 24-105mm is lightweight and designed for everyday versatility, making it ideal for travel and casual photography. Conversely, the Tamron 70-180mm features a moisture-resistant construction, which adds durability for outdoor shoots. The Canon lens is designed to maintain a slim profile, making it comfortable for extended use. The Tamron's design includes a zoom lock switch and fluorine coating for scratch resistance, enhancing its practicality in challenging conditions.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon RF 24-105mm offers a versatile zoom range from wide-angle to short-telephoto, making it suitable for landscapes, portraits, and close framing without switching lenses. On the other hand, the Tamron 70-180mm excels in telephoto applications, providing a focal length that allows for distant subject capture, which is particularly beneficial for wildlife and sports photography. The focal lengths serve different photographic needs; Canon’s range is broader for everyday scenarios, while Tamron’s range is focused on longer distances.
Aperture Performance
A key difference lies in the aperture performance. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens has a variable aperture of f/4-7.1, which is adequate for most conditions but may struggle in low-light situations. In contrast, the Tamron 70-180mm offers a consistent f/2.8 aperture throughout its zoom range, providing superior low-light performance and depth-of-field control. This makes the Tamron lens more suitable for professional photographers who require better low-light capabilities and bokeh effects.
Image Stabilization
Both lenses feature image stabilization, but they implement it differently. The Canon RF 24-105mm includes an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to five stops of correction, significantly aiding handheld shooting in low light. The Tamron 70-180mm incorporates TAMRON’s proprietary VC (Vibration Compensation) mechanism, which enhances shooting stability across its zoom range. While both systems aim to reduce camera shake, the Canon’s stabilization may have an edge for casual users due to its five-stop capability, which is particularly useful for handheld photography.
Autofocus System
Autofocus performance is another area where these lenses diverge. The Canon RF 24-105mm utilizes a smooth and quiet STM stepping motor that delivers precise autofocus, making it suitable for both photography and video recording. The Tamron 70-180mm, however, features the VXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive) mechanism, which offers high-speed and high-precision autofocus with improved subject tracking. This makes the Tamron lens particularly appealing for capturing fast-moving subjects, such as in sports photography, where quick and accurate focusing is essential.
Target Audience
The target audience for each lens varies significantly. The Canon RF 24-105mm is designed for everyday users, including travelers and casual photographers looking for a versatile lens that performs well across various scenarios. In contrast, the Tamron 70-180mm is tailored towards professionals or serious enthusiasts who require a high-performance telephoto lens for specific applications like portraiture or wildlife photography. This distinction in target audience reflects in their prices and features, catering to different levels of photographic expertise and needs.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Lens and the Tamron 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 boils down to your specific needs and budget. If you’re seeking a versatile, budget-friendly lens for everyday use, the Canon lens is an excellent choice at $476.95. However, if you prioritize low-light performance and telephoto capabilities and are willing to invest more, the Tamron lens at $999.00 offers superior features that cater to professional demands.

