vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs VILTROX AF

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on weight and zoom range, VILTROX AF wins on focal length.

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers greater versatility and features, while the VILTROX AF 50mm excels in low-light performance and bokeh. Choose based on your specific photography needs.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Versatility

Canon covers a wide zoom range.

Image Stabilization

Canon has built-in stabilization.

Macro Capability

Canon offers a dedicated macro focus position.

Why VILTROX AF is better

Price

VILTROX is significantly cheaper.

Low-Light Performance

VILTROX has a larger aperture.

Compactness

VILTROX is lighter and more portable.

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
VILTROX AF
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-VILTROX AF
AutofocusSTM motorSTM motor
Image StabilizationYesNo
Aperture Blades79
Macro FocusYesNo
Price$476.95$199.00

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-VILTROX AF

Overview of Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens and VILTROX AF 50mm F2.0 Air Z Lens

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens is a versatile zoom lens priced at $476.95, while the VILTROX AF 50mm F2.0 Air Z Lens is a prime lens available for $199.00. The substantial price difference, about 58%, reflects their differing target uses and capabilities. Canon's offering is designed for broader photography, covering a range of focal lengths, whereas VILTROX focuses on delivering a high-quality, fixed focal length ideal for specific scenarios such as portraits.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers a flexible zoom range from wide-angle to short-telephoto, enabling photographers to capture landscapes, portraits, and close-up shots without needing to switch lenses. This makes it particularly appealing for travel and everyday photography. In contrast, the VILTROX lens has a fixed focal length of 50mm, which provides a standard perspective often favored for portraits and street photography. While the Canon provides more versatility, the VILTROX delivers a specific quality and aesthetic that many photographers seek in a prime lens.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The VILTROX AF 50mm F2.0 boasts a large maximum aperture of F2.0, which allows for excellent low-light performance and the ability to create a beautiful bokeh effect thanks to its nine aperture blades. This feature is particularly beneficial for portrait photographers looking to isolate subjects from the background. The Canon RF lens has a variable aperture ranging from f/4 to f/7.1, which, while sufficient for many conditions, does not match the low-light capabilities of the VILTROX lens. Thus, if low-light performance and artistic background blur are priorities, the VILTROX may be the better choice.

Autofocus Capabilities

The Canon RF 24-105mm lens features a smooth and quiet STM stepping motor that excels in both photography and video recording, providing precise autofocus and natural focus transitions. This is particularly useful for hybrid content creators who require seamless transitions during video shoots. The VILTROX lens also utilizes an STM motor for autofocus, supporting eye and face detection for improved accuracy. While both lenses offer reliable autofocus, the Canon's versatility in various shooting conditions gives it an edge for diverse applications.

Build Quality and Design

The Canon RF lens is designed with a compact and lightweight profile, making it an excellent companion for travel and extended shooting sessions. It includes a dedicated Center Macro Focus position for close-up work, which enhances its versatility. The VILTROX lens is also compact at just 220 grams, designed for Nikon Z mount cameras. Both lenses are built for ease of use, but the Canon's additional features like the configurable Control Ring and macro capabilities may appeal more to those requiring a multi-functional lens.

Image Stabilization

A standout feature of the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is its built-in Optical Image Stabilizer, which provides up to five stops of stabilization. This significantly benefits handheld shooting, especially in low-light scenarios or at longer focal lengths. The VILTROX lens does not explicitly mention image stabilization, which could be a limitation for users requiring steadiness in their shots, particularly in challenging conditions. Therefore, photographers prioritizing stabilization may find the Canon lens to be the superior option.

Ideal Use Cases

The Canon RF lens is ideal for a wide range of scenarios, including travel, street photography, and casual video work, due to its versatile zoom range and image stabilization features. This makes it suitable for everyday photography needs. On the other hand, the VILTROX AF 50mm F2.0 is tailored more towards portrait and street photography, where a fixed focal length and artistic bokeh can enhance visual storytelling. Determining the right use case will greatly influence which lens is more suitable for your photography style.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 is STM Lens and the VILTROX AF 50mm F2.0 Air Z Lens largely depends on your photography needs. The Canon lens, priced at $476.95, offers superior versatility, image stabilization, and a broader range of applications, making it a solid choice for those who want an all-in-one solution. Conversely, the VILTROX lens, at just $199.00, provides exceptional low-light capabilities and a beautiful bokeh effect, appealing to portrait and street photographers. Ultimately, if you value flexibility and diverse shooting options, the Canon may be your best bet, while the VILTROX is perfect for those focused on specific styles and aesthetics.