vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on zoom range and aperture, Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- wins on price and autofocus.

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II offers superior low-light performance and faster autofocus, making it the better choice for professional use.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Price

Canon is significantly cheaper at $1,399.00.

Zoom Range

Canon offers a broader zoom range of 24-105mm.

Weight

Canon is lighter and more compact for long shoots.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- is better

Aperture

Nikon has a constant f/2.8 aperture for better low-light performance.

Autofocus

Nikon's autofocus is 5x faster and 50% quieter.

Stability

Nikon's internal zoom enhances stability and usability with gimbals.

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
78
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-
85

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-
Image StabilizationYesNo
Control RingYesYes
Bokeh QualityGoodExcellent
Build QualityHighPremium
Focus Distance1.5 ft0.79 ft

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L and Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens is priced at $1,399.00, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II comes in at $2,796.95, making it about 17% more expensive. Both lenses cater to professional photographers but offer distinct features that serve different needs. The Canon lens provides a versatile zoom range and a constant f/4 aperture, while the Nikon lens emphasizes speed, quiet autofocus, and a constant f/2.8 aperture for low-light conditions.

Build Quality and Design

The design of each lens offers unique advantages tailored to specific shooting scenarios. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is characterized by its compact size and high-quality build, designed for the EOS R system. Its lightweight design makes it easy to handle, particularly for long shooting sessions. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II features an internal zoom mechanism that enhances stability while also providing dust and drip resistance. This makes it ideal for outdoor shooting conditions, where environmental factors can impact gear performance.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

A key difference between these two lenses lies in their aperture specifications. The Canon RF 24-105mm features a constant f/4 aperture, which is good for general photography but may struggle in extremely low-light conditions. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm boasts a constant f/2.8 aperture, allowing for better performance in low-light settings and more creative depth-of-field control. This f/2.8 aperture enables photographers to achieve softer bokeh effects, making it a preferred choice for portrait and event photography.

Autofocus Capabilities

Autofocus performance is critical for both still and video shooting. The Canon RF 24-105mm incorporates a Nano USM motor for smooth and silent autofocus, making it suitable for various types of photography. However, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm takes this a step further with an autofocus system that is five times faster and 50% quieter than its predecessor. This enhanced focus speed and reduced operational noise make the Nikon lens particularly advantageous for videographers who need to minimize distractions during recording.

Image Stabilization

When it comes to image stabilization, both lenses offer features that enhance handheld shooting. The Canon RF 24-105mm includes optical image stabilization effective up to five stops, helping to mitigate camera shake and produce sharper images. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm does not explicitly mention image stabilization but benefits significantly from its internal zoom mechanism, which contributes to overall stability while shooting. This difference may play a crucial role for photographers who often shoot without a tripod.

Versatility and Zoom Range

Versatility is another important factor to consider when comparing these two lenses. The Canon RF 24-105mm offers a broader zoom range from 24mm to 105mm, making it ideal for a variety of subjects, from landscapes to portraits. This extensive range allows for greater creative flexibility. Meanwhile, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm, while slightly limited in zoom range, excels in situations requiring fast transitions and stable shooting. Its design is optimized for use with gimbals and matte boxes, making it suitable for dynamic shooting environments.

Additional Features

Each lens includes unique features that enhance usability. The Canon RF 24-105mm has a control ring that allows for direct adjustments to settings, adding convenience for photographers. Conversely, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm features a custom control ring with a click on/off switch, enabling users to switch between click adjustments and smooth changes seamlessly. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who require precise control over their shooting settings, further enhancing the Nikon lens's usability for video production.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II depends largely on your specific photographic needs. The Canon lens is a more budget-friendly option at $1,399.00, making it suitable for photographers looking for versatility and quality without breaking the bank. However, if low-light performance, faster autofocus, and enhanced stability are critical for your work, the Nikon lens, though nearly double the price at $2,796.95, offers features that can justify the investment. Ultimately, both lenses are excellent in their own right, but your choice should align with your shooting style and requirements.