vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on aperture and build quality, Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- wins on zoom range and weight.

The Canon RF 24-105mm offers a consistent aperture and excellent image stabilization, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm provides a broader zoom range and lighter weight. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Image Stabilization

Canon offers up to five stops of shake correction.

Aperture

Canon has a constant f/4 maximum aperture.

Autofocus Technology

Canon features Nano USM for fast focusing.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- is better

Zoom Range

Nikon has a 14.2x zoom range from 28mm to 400mm.

Weight

Nikon is the lightest lens in its class at 1.6 lbs.

Close-Up Capability

Nikon has a minimum focus distance of 0.2 m.

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-
78

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-
Max Aperturef/4f/4-8
Zoom Ratio4.4x14.2x
Min Focus Dist.Not Specified0.2 m
Weight1.5 lbs1.6 lbs
Image Stabilization5 stops5 stops

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-

Overview

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Mirrorless Lens offer unique features that cater to different photography needs. The Canon lens is priced at $1,399.00, while the Nikon lens is more economical at $1,296.95, making it about 7.3% cheaper. This price difference may influence buyers who are budget-conscious but are considering the specific capabilities of each lens.

Design and Build Quality

The Canon RF 24-105mm is compact and designed specifically for the EOS R system, showcasing a high-quality build typical of L-Series lenses. It features a control ring for direct setting changes, which enhances usability. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm is touted as the lightest lens in its class, weighing approximately 1.6 lbs, making it easy to carry and shoot handheld. Both lenses prioritize user comfort, but the Nikon's lighter weight could be a significant advantage for long shooting sessions.

Zoom Range and Versatility

The Canon lens offers a versatile 24-105mm zoom range, ideal for a variety of shooting situations from wide-angle landscapes to short telephoto portraits. On the other hand, the Nikon lens boasts a remarkable 14.2x zoom range, covering focal lengths from 28mm to 400mm. This extensive range makes the Nikon particularly suitable for dynamic environments like sports and wildlife photography, where flexibility is crucial. The Nikon's broader zoom range offers users greater versatility, particularly for those who may want to capture distant subjects without changing lenses.

Maximum Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The Canon RF lens features a constant f/4 maximum aperture, providing consistent exposure throughout its zoom range. This is beneficial for maintaining depth of field without adjusting settings frequently. The Nikon lens, however, has a variable aperture ranging from f/4 to f/8, which may limit its performance in low-light conditions compared to the Canon. Despite this, both lenses include image stabilization technology; the Canon offers up to five stops of shake correction, while the Nikon's VR performance is equivalent to a 5.0-stop increase in shutter speed, which helps in minimizing blurriness during handheld shooting.

Autofocus and Shooting Experience

Autofocus is a critical feature for photographers, and both lenses deliver in this regard. The Canon RF 24-105mm includes Nano USM technology, ensuring fast and accurate focusing, which is essential for capturing sharp images of moving subjects. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm also provides fast and accurate autofocus, with support for linear MF drive that enables smooth focusing, particularly beneficial for video shooting. While both lenses excel in autofocus capabilities, the Canon's specialized USM technology may provide an edge in certain shooting conditions.

Close-Up Capability

The close-up capability of a lens can significantly enhance its versatility. The Nikon lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.2 m at its maximum wide-angle position, allowing for dynamic expression through close-up shots. This feature is particularly appealing for photographers looking to capture intricate details in their subjects. In comparison, while the Canon lens does not specify a minimum focus distance in the provided data, its design is more geared towards general versatility rather than close-up photography.

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Canon RF 24-105mm is priced at $1,399.00, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm is available for $1,296.95. This difference of about $102.05 may seem minor to some but could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious buyers. Furthermore, the Nikon lens has an average price of $1,178.37 over the last 90 days, suggesting it may be a better value option in the long run, especially if it regularly falls below its current price point.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm largely depends on your specific photography needs. If you prioritize a compact design, consistent aperture, and excellent image stabilization, the Canon RF 24-105mm could be the better option. However, if you are looking for a versatile lens with an extensive zoom range and a lighter build, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm is the way to go, especially considering its lower price point. Ultimately, both lenses have their strengths, making them suitable for different styles of photography.