Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 18-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on build and image quality, Tamron 18- wins on price and zoom.
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers superior image quality and advanced features, while the Tamron 18-300mm lens provides excellent versatility at a lower price.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Image Quality
Canon lens has a constant f/4 aperture for better low light performance.
Build Quality
Canon lens is built to professional standards with robust construction.
Advanced Features
Canon lens includes Nano USM technology for faster autofocus.
Why Tamron 18- is better
Price
Tamron lens is significantly cheaper at $599.
Zoom Range
Tamron lens offers a 16.6x zoom range for more versatility.
Weight
Tamron lens is lighter and more travel-friendly.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Tamron 18- |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/4 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Max Zoom | 105mm | 300mm |
| Stabilization | 5 Stops | VC |
| Focusing | Nano USM | VXD |
| Warranty | 1 Year | 6 Years |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens is priced at $1,399.00, making it a high-end option for photographers. This lens features a constant f/4 maximum aperture and a five-stop image stabilization system, which is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in various lighting conditions. The lens is designed for the EOS R system and is compact, yet delivers high-quality images across its zoom range. With its advanced features, it stands out as a versatile tool for both amateur and professional photographers.
Overview of the Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Zoom Lens
The Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Zoom Lens is significantly cheaper at $599.00, making it about 57% less expensive than the Canon lens. This all-in-one zoom lens offers a remarkable 16.6x zoom range, allowing for wide-angle shots as well as ultra-telephoto images without the need to change lenses. It is especially suitable for travel and everyday photography, thanks to its compact and lightweight design. The lens also incorporates vibration compensation, enhancing stability during shooting.
Image Quality and Performance
In terms of image quality, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens excels with its constant f/4 aperture, providing consistent performance throughout its zoom range. It features Canon's Nano USM technology, which enhances focus speed and accuracy. On the other hand, the Tamron 18-300mm lens, while versatile, has a variable aperture ranging from f/3.5 to f/6.3. This means that while it captures a wide range of subjects, its performance in low light may not be as strong as the Canon lens. Both lenses deliver sharp images, but the optical quality of the Canon lens is often preferred for professional work.
Versatility and Convenience
The Tamron 18-300mm lens is designed for versatility, making it ideal for a variety of photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and wildlife. Its extensive zoom range allows photographers to adapt quickly to changing scenes, making it perfect for travel. Conversely, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens, while also versatile, is more focused on providing high-quality images in various situations rather than an extensive zoom range. Photographers seeking a single lens for a multitude of uses may find the Tamron lens more appealing due to its all-in-one nature.
Build Quality and Design
The build quality of the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is indicative of its L-series designation, which typically signifies a robust construction meant to withstand professional use. It includes a control ring for direct setting changes, enhancing the shooting experience. The Tamron 18-300mm lens, while still compact and lightweight, does not have the same level of ruggedness as the Canon lens. However, it is designed with travel in mind, making it more convenient for casual photographers who prioritize portability.
Price and Value
The price difference between these two lenses is substantial, with the Tamron lens costing $599.00 compared to the Canon lens at $1,399.00. This $800 difference represents about a 57% savings for those who choose the Tamron lens. For casual photographers or those just starting out, the Tamron lens offers excellent value without sacrificing too much in terms of performance. However, professionals may justify the higher price of the Canon lens due to its superior optical quality and features.
Additional Features
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens includes advanced features such as optical image stabilization at up to five stops of shake correction, making it more effective for handheld shooting. Its Nano USM technology enhances autofocus performance, ensuring quick and accurate focusing. The Tamron 18-300mm lens also boasts features like a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2, which is impressive for an all-in-one lens. It includes an AF/MF switch and a VC ON/OFF switch, but it may not match the advanced features found in the Canon lens.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens and the Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Zoom Lens largely depends on your photography needs and budget. If you are a professional or serious enthusiast looking for exceptional image quality and advanced features, the Canon lens is worth the investment. However, if you are a casual photographer searching for a versatile and affordable option for everyday use, the Tamron lens provides excellent value and flexibility. Ultimately, both lenses have their strengths, catering to different types of photographers and shooting scenarios.

