Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on weight and image stabilization, Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony wins on zoom range and length.
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers superior optical performance and build quality, while the Tamron 28-200mm lens provides excellent versatility at a lower price. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Optical Quality
Canon's L-Series is renowned for superior image quality.
Build Quality
Canon lens features a premium build with weather sealing.
Aperture Consistency
Constant f/4 aperture throughout the zoom range.
Why Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony is better
Price
Tamron lens is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Tamron lens is lighter at 20.3 oz.
Versatility
Tamron offers a broader zoom range in a single lens.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1399.00 | $699.00 |
| Max Focal Length | 105mm | 200mm |
| Min Focal Length | 24mm | 28mm |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
| Close Focus | 1.5 ft | 0.625 ft |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm and Tamron 28-200mm Lenses
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens is priced at $1,399.00, while the Tamron 28-200mm F/2.8-5.6 is available for $699.00, making it about 50% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different photography styles and needs, making them suitable for various users. The Canon lens is designed to provide high-quality images in a compact design, ideal for the EOS R system. In contrast, the Tamron lens offers versatility with a fast maximum aperture, making it an excellent option for those seeking an all-in-one solution for their Sony mirrorless cameras.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is known for its compact, high-quality build, making it an excellent choice for serious photographers. It features a control ring for direct setting changes, enhancing the usability of the lens. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-200mm lens is lightweight at 20.3 ounces and compact at 4.6 inches, allowing for superior mobility while shooting. Both lenses exhibit thoughtful design elements that cater to photographers on the move, but the Tamron’s smaller size and lower weight may appeal more to those prioritizing portability.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Canon RF 24-105mm features a constant f/4 maximum aperture, which allows for consistent exposure throughout the zoom range. This makes it suitable for a variety of lighting conditions, especially when combined with its five-stop optical image stabilization. In contrast, the Tamron 28-200mm lens offers a variable aperture of f/2.8-5.6. While the f/2.8 at the 28mm wide-angle end provides excellent low-light performance, the lens's maximum aperture decreases as you zoom in. This variability can limit its effectiveness in challenging lighting conditions compared to the Canon lens.
Versatility in Shooting
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens offers a broad zoom range, making it ideal for various photography styles, from landscape to portraits. Its optical image stabilization helps reduce camera shake, which is essential for handheld shooting. Conversely, the Tamron 28-200mm lens is marketed as an all-in-one zoom, allowing photographers to capture a wide range of scenes, from wide-angle shots to telephoto perspectives. Its close-up shooting capabilities are impressive, with a minimum focusing distance of 7.5 inches at the wide end, enhancing its versatility for macro photography.
Image Quality
Both lenses are built to deliver high image quality, but they achieve it in different ways. The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is part of Canon's L-Series, which is renowned for its superior optical performance. It includes features such as Nano USM technology for fast and quiet autofocus, ensuring sharp images. The Tamron 28-200mm also boasts remarkable image quality, with a precise arrangement of special lens elements designed to accommodate high-resolution sensors. However, the Canon lens may edge out in sharpness and clarity, particularly at the longer focal lengths.
Price and Value
The price difference between the two lenses is significant, with the Canon RF 24-105mm priced at $1,399.00 and the Tamron 28-200mm at $699.00. This makes the Tamron lens about 50% cheaper, offering great value for photographers looking for an affordable all-in-one solution. However, the Canon lens's higher price reflects its premium build and optical performance, making it a worthwhile investment for professional photographers who demand the best.
Target Audience
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is tailored for serious photographers using the EOS R system who require a reliable, high-quality lens for various shooting scenarios. Its features cater to professionals who prioritize performance and image quality. In contrast, the Tamron 28-200mm lens is aimed at enthusiasts and travelers seeking convenience without compromising too much on quality. Its lightweight design and versatile zoom range make it ideal for casual shooting, travel photography, and everyday use.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm and the Tamron 28-200mm ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a professional or serious enthusiast seeking superior optical performance and are willing to invest more, the Canon lens may be the better choice. However, if you're looking for an affordable, versatile lens that offers decent quality and a broad zoom range, the Tamron lens is an excellent option. Its lower price point and compact design make it particularly appealing for travel and casual photography.

