vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 28-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on price and zoom range, Tamron 28- wins on length.

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L offers superior versatility and image stabilization, while the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 excels in low-light performance and affordability.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Versatility

Broader zoom range of 24-105mm

Stabilization

Five-stop image stabilization

Build Quality

Control ring for direct setting changes

Why Tamron 28- is better

Price

More affordable at $749.00

Aperture

Faster f/2.8 maximum aperture

Weight

Lighter at 19.4 oz

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
Tamron 28-
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-Tamron 28-
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Image StabilizationYesNo
Minimum Focus1.28 ft7.1 in
Motor TypeNano USMVXD
WarrantyNot Specified6 Years

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-Tamron 28-

Price Comparison

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens is priced at $1,399.00, making it significantly more expensive than the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2, which retails for $749.00. This means the Canon lens is about 86% higher in price compared to the Tamron lens. For budget-conscious photographers or those seeking a versatile lens without breaking the bank, the Tamron offers a compelling option without sacrificing essential features. The price difference may be a deciding factor for many users, especially those just starting in photography or those who prefer to invest in multiple lenses over a single high-end model.

Optical Performance

Both lenses deliver impressive optical performance, but they cater to different needs. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L features a constant f/4 maximum aperture, which is ideal for maintaining consistent exposure while zooming. With a five-stop-effective image stabilizer, it minimizes camera shake, making it suitable for handheld shooting in various situations. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 boasts a faster f/2.8 aperture, providing more light for low-light conditions and a shallower depth of field for creative shots. This can be particularly advantageous for portrait photography. While the Canon lens offers versatility with its broader zoom range, the Tamron's superior aperture gives it an edge in specific shooting scenarios.

Build Quality and Design

In terms of build quality, both lenses exhibit thoughtful design features. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is compact and includes a control ring for direct setting changes, enhancing usability during shoots. Its optical image stabilization further ensures stable shooting. Conversely, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 is also compact, measuring just 4.7 inches long and weighing only 19.4 oz, making it a lightweight choice for travel and everyday use. It features a moisture-resistant construction, making it more suitable for challenging weather conditions. The fluorine coating on the Tamron lens also aids in keeping the lens clean and scratch-free. While both lenses are designed for durability, the Tamron's lighter weight and weather resistance may appeal to outdoor photographers.

Autofocus Capabilities

When it comes to autofocus, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 is equipped with a fast, quiet VXD linear motor that provides high-speed and high-precision autofocus. This makes it an excellent choice for capturing fast-moving subjects or spontaneous moments. Although the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is also designed for effective autofocus, its features are less explicitly detailed in the specifications provided. However, it is known for its consistent performance with Canon's EOS R system. For photographers who prioritize quick and accurate focusing, especially in dynamic environments, the Tamron lens may offer a superior experience.

Versatility in Shooting

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is highly versatile due to its zoom range of 24-105mm, making it suitable for a wide array of photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. Its constant aperture allows for consistent exposure throughout the zoom range, which is a significant advantage for photographers who frequently change framing while shooting. In contrast, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8, while slightly limited in zoom range, excels in portrait and close-up photography with a minimum object distance of 7.1 inches and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.7. This makes it an attractive option for creative close-ups and detailed shots. Depending on the photographer's primary needs, each lens presents unique advantages.

Warranty and Support

The Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 comes with a six-year limited USA warranty, which reflects the manufacturer's confidence in its product and provides peace of mind to consumers. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L's warranty details were not specified, but Canon typically offers reliable customer support and service. A longer warranty like that of the Tamron lens can be particularly appealing to buyers who are concerned about potential issues or defects. This aspect can influence purchasing decisions, especially for those who lean towards long-term investments in their photography equipment.

User Experience and Compatibility

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is specifically designed for the EOS R system, ensuring optimal compatibility and seamless performance. This lens is ideal for users already invested in the Canon ecosystem. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 is designed for Nikon Z mount mirrorless cameras, making it a perfect fit for Nikon users seeking a high-performance standard zoom lens. Both lenses are user-friendly and cater to a range of photographic needs, but potential buyers should consider their existing camera systems when making a decision.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L and the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 largely depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're a Canon user looking for a versatile, high-quality lens with a wide zoom range and reliable image stabilization, the Canon RF 24-105mm is a strong choice. However, if you're seeking a more budget-friendly option that excels in low-light situations and offers excellent autofocus capabilities, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 at $749.00 presents a compelling alternative. Ultimately, both lenses have their strengths, and the best choice will align with your photographic style and the camera system you use.