Canon RF 24- vs Tamron 35-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on weight and length, Tamron 35- wins on aperture and autofocus.
The Canon RF 24-105mm offers excellent value and versatility, while the Tamron 35-150mm excels in low-light performance and autofocus speed.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Price
Canon is $100 cheaper than Tamron.
Weight
Canon is more compact and lightweight.
Versatility
Canon has a broader zoom range.
Why Tamron 35- is better
Aperture
Tamron has a faster f/2-2.8 aperture.
Autofocus
Tamron features a high-speed VXD motor.
Close Focus
Tamron has superior close-focusing capability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | Tamron 35- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1399.00 | $1499.00 |
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2-2.8 |
| Zoom Range | 24-105mm | 35-150mm |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus Motor | Nano USM | VXD |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Canon RF 24-105mm and Tamron 35-150mm
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens and the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD are both versatile options for photographers, but they cater to slightly different needs. The Canon lens is priced at $1,399.00, while the Tamron lens costs $1,499.00, making the Canon lens about 7% cheaper than the Tamron. Both lenses offer unique features that may appeal to different types of photographers, from casual users to professionals.
Build Quality and Design
When it comes to build quality, the Canon RF 24-105mm is a compact and high-quality lens designed for the EOS R system. It features a control ring for direct setting changes and is the first L-Series lens with Nano USM technology. On the other hand, the Tamron 35-150mm is slightly bulkier at 6.2 inches long and weighs 41.1 oz. While the Tamron lens offers a robust design, photographers seeking a lightweight option may prefer the Canon, which provides a more portable solution for travel or outdoor shooting.
Optical Performance
The Tamron 35-150mm boasts the world’s first F2-2.8 fast aperture zoom lens, which provides excellent optical performance at various focal lengths. This feature makes it an ideal choice for both travel and portrait photography. The Canon RF 24-105mm, while featuring a constant f/4 maximum aperture, still delivers sharp images thanks to its five-stop effective image stabilization. However, in low-light situations or when capturing portraits with soft background bokeh, the Tamron lens may have the upper hand due to its wider aperture range.
Autofocus Capabilities
Autofocus performance is crucial for capturing the perfect shot, and both lenses excel in this area. The Canon RF 24-105mm utilizes a Nano USM motor for fast, precise focusing, making it suitable for a variety of shooting conditions. In comparison, the Tamron 35-150mm features a VXD linear motor that provides high-speed and high-precision autofocus, particularly beneficial for fast-moving subjects or video work. For photographers who prioritize autofocus speed and accuracy, the Tamron lens may have a slight advantage.
Versatility in Shooting
Versatility is another critical factor when choosing a lens. The Canon RF 24-105mm offers a broad zoom range, making it suitable for various photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. Meanwhile, the Tamron 35-150mm lens covers a focal range that is particularly effective for portrait photography, allowing users to shoot from wide to telephoto without changing lenses. This adaptability makes the Tamron an excellent option for event photographers who require flexibility in their shooting range.
Price and Value
The Canon RF 24-105mm is priced at $1,399.00, while the Tamron 35-150mm retails for $1,499.00, making the Canon about $100 cheaper. Despite the slight price difference, both lenses offer unique features that justify their costs. The Canon lens provides a slightly more affordable option with a consistent f/4 aperture, while the Tamron lens offers a faster aperture at a higher price point. For budget-conscious photographers, the Canon may provide better value, but the Tamron's advanced features could justify the extra investment for those who need them.
Target Audience
The Canon RF 24-105mm is well-suited for photographers who are invested in the EOS R system and seek a high-quality, compact lens for general photography. Its versatility and image stabilization make it ideal for various shooting scenarios. Conversely, the Tamron 35-150mm targets portrait and travel photographers who prioritize low-light performance and the ability to shoot with a fast aperture. Each lens caters to different user needs, making the choice largely dependent on the photographer's specific style and requirements.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF 24-105mm and the Tamron 35-150mm comes down to your specific needs and budget. The Canon lens is about 7% cheaper, offers excellent versatility, and is designed for the EOS R system. On the other hand, the Tamron lens provides a faster aperture and superior autofocus capabilities, making it ideal for those focused on portrait photography and low-light conditions. Assess your priorities—whether it’s budget, build quality, or optical performance—to determine which lens aligns best with your photographic goals.

