vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on price and zoom range, VILTROX wins on weight.

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L offers versatility and superior build quality, while the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 provides excellent low-light performance at a lower price.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Versatility

Canon lens offers a zoom range from wide-angle to short telephoto.

Build Quality

Canon's L-Series construction is robust and durable.

Image Stabilization

Canon lens features optical image stabilization for sharper images.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

VILTROX lens is significantly cheaper.

Low-Light Performance

VILTROX's f/1.8 aperture excels in low-light conditions.

Weight

VILTROX lens is lighter and more portable.

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
VILTROX
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-VILTROX
Lens TypeZoomPrime
Max Aperturef/4f/1.8
AutofocusNano USMSTM
Image QualityHighVery High
Optical Elements1515

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-VILTROX

Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L and VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is USM Zoom Lens is priced at $1,399.00, while the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens offers a much lower price of $580.00. This significant price difference, approximately 59% cheaper for the VILTROX lens, raises the question of what features and performance you can expect from each lens. Canon's offering is a versatile zoom lens suitable for a variety of shooting scenarios, while the VILTROX lens is designed primarily for wide-angle photography with an impressive aperture for low-light conditions.

Lens Type and Functionality

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is a zoom lens, making it highly versatile for different types of photography, ranging from wide-angle to short telephoto shots. This lens has a constant f/4 maximum aperture, which is beneficial for maintaining exposure across its zoom range. The VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens, on the other hand, is a prime lens, specifically designed for wide-angle photography. Its f/1.8 aperture allows for superior low-light performance and a shallow depth of field, creating beautiful bokeh effects. Thus, if you require versatility in focal length, the Canon lens is the clear choice, while the VILTROX excels in low-light conditions and wide perspectives.

Build Quality and Features

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is a premium L-Series lens, known for its robust construction and high-quality optics. It features optical image stabilization, which helps to reduce camera shake by up to five stops. This is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in various lighting conditions. Conversely, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens is lightweight and portable, weighing only 19.9 oz (565g), making it ideal for travel and street photography. It also includes a built-in LCD screen that displays key shooting parameters, enhancing user experience. While both lenses have unique features, the Canon lens stands out for its image stabilization and build quality, whereas the VILTROX offers innovative usability features.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus capabilities are crucial for capturing sharp images quickly. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L employs a Nano USM motor for fast and silent autofocus, making it suitable for both still photography and video shooting. On the other hand, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens features an STM stepping motor that provides precise autofocus with face and eye recognition, further enhancing its utility for portrait and street photography. This means that while both lenses are equipped with reliable autofocus systems, the Canon lens may offer faster performance in a wider variety of conditions, while VILTROX’s lens excels in tracking subjects, especially in portrait scenarios.

Compatibility with Camera Systems

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is designed exclusively for the EOS R system, which may limit its usability if you own a different camera brand. However, it’s fully compatible with all Canon's full-frame mirrorless cameras. In contrast, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens is optimized for Nikon Z-Mount full-frame mirrorless cameras, making it compatible with a wide range of models such as Z5, Z6, Z7, and more. The broader compatibility of the VILTROX lens allows Nikon users to utilize it across multiple camera bodies, providing greater flexibility compared to the Canon lens.

Price and Value Proposition

With the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L priced at $1,399.00 and the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens at $580.00, the VILTROX lens presents a significant cost advantage, being approximately 59% cheaper. For photographers on a budget or those who prioritize affordability, the VILTROX lens offers excellent value without compromising on performance, especially for wide-angle shooting and low-light conditions. The Canon lens, while more expensive, may justify its price with superior build quality and versatility, appealing to serious photographers who need a reliable all-rounder.

Image Quality and Performance

Both lenses are designed to deliver high-quality images, but their performance may vary based on the shooting scenario. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is engineered to provide sharpness across its zoom range, making it suitable for various situations, from landscapes to portraits. Its optical image stabilization further enhances image quality by reducing blur. On the other hand, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens features 12 groups of 15 optical elements, including three aspherical lenses, ensuring remarkable image sharpness and detail, especially in wide-angle shots. For photographers focused on landscape or architectural photography, the VILTROX's wide perspective and low-light capabilities may offer compelling advantages.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L and the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If versatility, build quality, and features like optical stabilization are your priorities, the Canon lens is the way to go. However, if you are a Nikon user looking for a budget-friendly option that excels in low-light conditions and wide-angle photography, the VILTROX lens stands out as an excellent choice. Consider your photography style and the types of subjects you usually capture to make the best-informed decision.