Canon RF 24- vs VILTROX AF
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on price and zoom range, VILTROX AF wins on weight.
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens offers versatility and superior build quality, while the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z lens excels in low-light performance and affordability.
Why Canon RF 24- is better
Versatility
Canon lens has a zoom range suitable for various photography styles.
Build Quality
Canon lens features robust L-series build.
Image Stabilization
Canon lens includes five-stop optical image stabilization.
Why VILTROX AF is better
Price
VILTROX lens is significantly cheaper.
Low-Light Performance
VILTROX lens has a faster f/1.8 aperture.
Compact Design
VILTROX lens is lighter and more portable.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 24- | VILTROX AF |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus | Nano USM | Precise AF |
| Image Quality | High | Excellent |
| Compatibility | EOS R | Nikon Z |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
| Minimum Focus | 1.25 ft | 0.88 ft |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens is a versatile option that caters to a wide range of photography needs. Priced at $1,399.00, this lens is designed for the EOS R system and boasts a broad zoom range, making it suitable for everything from landscapes to portraits. Its constant f/4 aperture allows for consistent exposure across the zoom range, and the five-stop optical image stabilization significantly reduces camera shake, providing sharper images in various lighting conditions. This lens appeals to both amateur and professional photographers who require a reliable and high-quality lens.
Overview of the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z Full Frame Lens
The VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z Full Frame Lens comes with a more budget-friendly price tag of $580.00, making it about 59% cheaper than the Canon lens. This ultra-wide-angle prime lens is compatible with Nikon Z-mount mirrorless cameras and is noted for its exceptional image quality. With a fast f/1.8 aperture, it excels in low-light conditions while delivering stunning bokeh effects. Its compact design and lightweight build make it an appealing choice for travel photographers who need a lens that is both portable and powerful.
Image Quality Comparison
In terms of image quality, the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM lens uses a constant f/4 aperture, ensuring consistent performance across its zoom range. The five-stop image stabilization also helps to achieve sharper handheld shots. On the other hand, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z lens stands out with its fast f/1.8 aperture, which allows for a shallower depth of field and excellent background bokeh. The lens incorporates three aspherical elements and four ED glass elements to minimize color bleeding and enhance overall resolution, making it a strong contender for landscape and architectural photography.
Autofocus Performance
Autofocus performance is crucial for both lenses. The Canon RF 24-105mm features a Nano USM motor, which provides fast and quiet autofocus, ideal for both stills and video work. While the VILTROX AF 16mm lens also boasts precise autofocus, with a minimum focus distance of just 0.88 feet, it allows photographers to capture dynamic close-ups while maintaining an expansive background. Both lenses cater well to different styles of photography, but the VILTROX may have an edge for those focusing on creative close-up shots.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens has a robust build quality typical of L-series lenses, designed to withstand the rigors of professional use. It includes a control ring for direct setting changes, enhancing user experience. Conversely, the VILTROX AF 16mm lens, while compact and lightweight at just 19.5 ounces, features a full metal body, ensuring durability without sacrificing portability. The built-in LCD display on the VILTROX lens is a unique feature, offering real-time lens information, which adds a modern touch to its design.
Price and Value for Money
When it comes to price, the Canon RF 24-105mm lens is significantly more expensive at $1,399.00, while the VILTROX AF 16mm lens is priced at $580.00. This places the VILTROX lens at about 59% less than the Canon option. For photographers on a budget, the VILTROX offers excellent value, especially considering its high-quality optics and features. However, the Canon lens justifies its higher price with its versatility and superior build quality, making it a worthy investment for professionals.
Use Cases and Suitability
The Canon RF 24-105mm lens is highly versatile, making it suitable for a variety of photography styles, including portraits, landscapes, and street photography. Its zoom range enables users to adapt to different scenes without needing to switch lenses frequently. In contrast, the VILTROX AF 16mm lens is best suited for landscape, architecture, and astrophotography, where ultra-wide-angle capabilities are essential. Depending on your photographic needs, either lens can be the right choice, but their optimal use cases differ significantly.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens and the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z Full Frame Lens ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for versatility and are willing to invest in a high-quality zoom lens, the Canon lens is a solid option. However, if you prefer a lightweight, compact lens with excellent low-light performance and a lower price point, the VILTROX lens is an outstanding choice. Both lenses excel in their respective areas, so consider what features matter most to you before making your decision.

