vsversusfinder

Canon RF 24- vs VILTROX PRO

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 24- wins on stabilization and versatility, VILTROX PRO wins on price and aperture.

The Canon RF 24-105mm offers superior versatility and build quality, while the VILTROX PRO 27mm excels in low light performance and affordability.

Why Canon RF 24- is better

Versatility

Canon offers a broad zoom range.

Stabilization

Canon has optical image stabilization.

Build Quality

Canon is more robust for professional use.

Why VILTROX PRO is better

Price

VILTROX is significantly cheaper.

Aperture

VILTROX has a faster f/1.2 aperture.

Weight

VILTROX is lighter and more compact.

Overall score

Canon RF 24-
85
VILTROX PRO
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 24-VILTROX PRO
Focal Length24-105mm27mm
Max Aperturef/4f/1.2
Image StabilizationYesNo
AutofocusFastPrecise
Zoom CapabilityYesNo

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 24-VILTROX PRO

Introduction to the Comparison

In this article, we will compare two intriguing camera lenses: the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens and the VILTROX PRO 27mm F1.2 XF Fuji for Fujifilm X Mount. Each lens offers unique features tailored to different photographic needs and styles, making them suitable for various users. The Canon lens is priced at $1,399.00, while the VILTROX lens is significantly more affordable at $578.00, which is about 59% less than the Canon option.

Design and Build Quality

The design and build quality of a lens can greatly affect its performance and usability. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is crafted for durability and versatility, featuring a compact, high-quality structure that is ideal for the EOS R system. This lens also includes a control ring for easy adjustments, enhancing the shooting experience. On the other hand, the VILTROX PRO 27mm F1.2 boasts a sleek design with a super large aperture, allowing for impressive bokeh effects. While both lenses are well-built, the Canon lens is more robust, making it suitable for professional use in diverse environments.

Aperture and Low Light Performance

Aperture plays a crucial role in a lens's ability to perform in low light conditions. The Canon lens features a constant f/4 aperture, providing a steady amount of light across its zoom range. In contrast, the VILTROX lens excels with its fast f/1.2 aperture, allowing for exceptional low light performance and achieving shallow depth of field for striking portraits. The VILTROX lens's ability to gather more light makes it a preferred choice for photographers who frequently shoot in dimly lit settings, giving it a distinct advantage over the Canon lens in this category.

Focal Length Versatility

Focal length versatility can influence a photographer's choice depending on their shooting style. The Canon RF 24-105mm offers a broad zoom range from wide-angle to short telephoto, making it suitable for a variety of scenarios, from landscapes to portraits. This flexibility is further enhanced by optical image stabilization, which minimizes camera shake. Conversely, the VILTROX PRO 27mm provides a 40mm equivalent focal length, which is versatile for street photography and everyday snapshots, but lacks the zoom capability of the Canon lens. For those who require adaptability in their photography, the Canon lens is the clear winner in this category.

Autofocus Capability

Autofocus performance is essential for capturing sharp images, especially with moving subjects. The Canon lens incorporates advanced autofocus technology, ensuring quick and precise focusing. Meanwhile, the VILTROX lens also promises precise and fast autofocusing performance, supporting eye focus and providing near-silent operation. This feature is particularly beneficial for candid shots or wildlife photography. While both lenses perform well in autofocus, the Canon lens’s established reputation in the professional market may give it an edge for users who prioritize speed and reliability.

Image Stabilization

Image stabilization can significantly enhance the quality of handheld shots. The Canon RF 24-105mm features optical image stabilization that offers up to five stops of shake correction, making it an excellent choice for handheld photography, especially in low light. The VILTROX lens, however, does not mention any stabilization features, which could be a limiting factor for users who often shoot without a tripod. Thus, in terms of stabilization, the Canon lens clearly stands out, providing greater confidence for handheld shooting scenarios.

Price Comparison

Price is a critical factor when choosing between two lenses. The Canon RF 24-105mm is priced at $1,399.00, while the VILTROX PRO 27mm is available for $578.00. This price difference of about $821.00 makes the VILTROX lens about 59% cheaper than the Canon option. For budget-conscious photographers or those just starting, the VILTROX lens offers an attractive balance of performance and price. However, the higher cost of the Canon lens reflects its professional-grade features and build quality.

Target Audience

The intended audience for each lens varies based on their features and price points. The Canon RF 24-105mm is designed for professionals or serious enthusiasts who value versatility, build quality, and advanced features. It's ideal for various photography styles and settings, making it a worthwhile investment for dedicated users. On the other hand, the VILTROX PRO 27mm lens appeals to hobbyists and those looking for an affordable option without compromising too much on performance. Its fast aperture and compact design make it great for casual shooting, street photography, and portrait work.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Zoom Lens and the VILTROX PRO 27mm F1.2 XF Fuji ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a versatile lens with a broad zoom range, superior image stabilization, and robust build quality, the Canon lens is the better choice, albeit at a higher price. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly lens that excels in low light and offers beautiful bokeh for portraits, the VILTROX lens is an excellent option. Both lenses have their strengths, but they cater to different types of photographers and shooting scenarios.