Canon RF 75- vs Canon RF24-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 75- wins on focal length and aperture, Canon RF24- wins on stabilization and macro.
The Canon RF 75-300mm offers excellent value for wildlife and sports photography, while the RF24-105mm excels in versatility and stabilization features.
Why Canon RF 75- is better
Price
RF 75-300mm is significantly cheaper at $253.95.
Weight
RF 75-300mm is lighter, making it easier to carry.
Focal Length
RF 75-300mm provides a longer reach for distant subjects.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Image Stabilization
RF24-105mm has optical image stabilization for clearer images.
Versatility
RF24-105mm covers a broader zoom range for various photography styles.
Macro Capability
RF24-105mm offers better close-up capabilities with 0.5x magnification.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 75- | Canon RF24- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $253.95 | $459.00 |
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/4-7.1 |
| Min Focus | 4.9 ft | 0.66 ft |
| Max Magnification | 0.25x | 0.5x |
| Autofocus | DC Motor | STM Motor |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is a compact telephoto zoom lens ideal for photographers seeking versatility in their shooting. Priced at $253.95, this lens offers a substantial focal range of 75-300mm, which translates to a 120-480mm equivalent on APS-C cameras. This makes it suitable for various photography styles, including sports, wildlife, and portraiture. Weighing just over 1 lb, it is designed for easy handling, making it a great choice for travel and everyday use.
The lens features a variable aperture of f/4-5.6, optimizing it for portability without compromising image quality. Its optical design incorporates Canon’s Super Spectra Coating, enhancing color fidelity and minimizing flare and ghosting. With a close-focusing capability of 4.9 feet, this lens also allows for semi-macro shots, making it a versatile tool for creative expression.
Overview of the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM is another excellent option, priced at $459.00. This lens covers a versatile zoom range of 24-105mm, making it suitable for landscapes, portraits, and travel photography. It also incorporates a leadscrew-type STM motor for smooth autofocusing, making it ideal for both stills and video work. This lens is particularly notable for its optical image stabilization, which offers up to 5 stops of shake correction, enhancing the clarity of images captured in challenging conditions.
The RF24-105mm lens has a minimum focusing distance of 0.66 feet with a maximum magnification of 0.4x, allowing for decent close-up capabilities. The addition of a control ring enables quick adjustments to settings such as shutter speed and aperture, providing photographers with more control over their shots.
Design and Build Quality
When it comes to design, the RF 75-300mm is lightweight and compact, making it easy to carry for extended periods. Its slim profile with a 58mm filter thread adds to its portability, making it a great companion for travel. In contrast, the RF24-105mm lens, while still compact, is slightly heavier and bulkier due to its additional features and wider focal range.
Both lenses are designed for Canon’s RF-mount mirrorless cameras, ensuring compatibility and optimal performance. However, the RF 75-300mm prioritizes a lightweight design, whereas the RF24-105mm balances weight with advanced features like image stabilization and a broader zoom range.
Performance in Various Shooting Conditions
The RF 75-300mm excels in outdoor photography, particularly in sports and wildlife scenarios where distance is crucial. Its long focal length allows photographers to capture distant subjects with clarity. The lens's sharp optical design, supported by Super Spectra Coating, ensures that images maintain high contrast and color fidelity even in bright conditions.
On the other hand, the RF24-105mm is designed to perform well in diverse lighting situations, thanks to its image stabilization technology. This feature is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in low-light environments. Additionally, the lens's macro capabilities are advantageous for close-up photography, offering a maximum magnification of 0.5x in center focus mode, making it a versatile choice for various photographic needs.
Autofocus and Operation
Autofocus performance is a key consideration for photographers. The RF 75-300mm utilizes a DC motor for its autofocus system, delivering responsive and accurate focusing, which is essential for capturing fast-moving subjects. However, it may not be as quiet as the STM motor found in the RF24-105mm, which provides smoother and quieter autofocus, a significant advantage for video recording and candid photography.
Both lenses offer good operational ease, but the RF24-105mm's additional control ring allows photographers to make quick adjustments while shooting, enhancing the overall shooting experience. For photographers who frequently switch settings, this feature can be a game changer.
Price Comparison
In terms of pricing, the RF 75-300mm is significantly more budget-friendly at $253.95, making it about 45% cheaper than the RF24-105mm, which is priced at $459.00. This price difference can be a decisive factor for photographers who are looking for a quality lens without breaking the bank. While the RF24-105mm offers advanced features such as optical image stabilization and a broader zoom range, many photographers may find the affordability of the RF 75-300mm a compelling reason to choose it.
Use Cases and Suitability
The RF 75-300mm is particularly well-suited for photographers focused on wildlife, sports, and portraits that require a longer reach. Its lightweight design and compact size make it a practical choice for travel photography where space and weight are considerations. The RF24-105mm, with its versatile zoom range and advanced stabilization features, is ideal for landscape and portrait photography, as well as situations where quick adjustments are necessary, such as event photography.
Ultimately, choosing between these lenses will depend on the intended use and specific needs of the photographer.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens and the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM boils down to your photography style and budget. The RF 75-300mm stands out for its affordability and long focal length, making it perfect for wildlife and sports photography. Meanwhile, the RF24-105mm offers advanced features like optical stabilization and a versatile zoom range, ideal for varied shooting conditions. If you prioritize portability and cost, the RF 75-300mm is the clear winner. However, if you seek versatility and enhanced control, the RF24-105mm may be worth the investment.

