Canon RF 75- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 75- wins on price and focal length, Nikon NIKKOR Z wins on aperture and weight.
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens offers versatility and affordability, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S excels in image quality and low-light performance. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF 75- is better
Price
Canon lens is significantly cheaper at $253.95.
Versatility
Canon lens offers a zoom range of 75-300mm.
Weight
Canon lens is lightweight at just over 1 lb.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better
Low-light
Nikon lens has a wider f/1.8 aperture.
Image Quality
Nikon lens provides extreme sharpness and low distortion.
Autofocus
Nikon lens features ultra-quiet focusing motor.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 75- | Nikon NIKKOR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 50mm |
| Weight | 1 lb | 0.88 lb |
| Motor Type | DC Motor | Stepping Motor |
| Close Focus | 4.9 ft | 1.48 ft |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is designed for photographers seeking a lightweight and versatile telephoto zoom lens. Priced at $253.95, it is significantly more affordable than the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S, which costs $566.95. This lens covers a focal length range suitable for various photography styles, including sports, wildlife, and portraits, making it a practical choice for everyday shooting. With a compact design and weighing just over 1 lb, it balances portability with functionality, appealing to both amateur and professional photographers.
Overview of the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S stands out as a premium large aperture prime lens, priced at $566.95. This lens is ideal for those who prioritize image quality and performance, particularly in low-light situations. Its f/1.8 aperture allows for exceptional sharpness and beautiful bokeh, making it an excellent choice for portrait photography. The lens features an ultra-quiet stepping motor for silent focusing, which is a significant advantage for videographers. Its compact and lightweight design further enhances its appeal for mirrorless camera users.
Focal Length Versatility
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 offers an impressive focal length range of 75-300mm, equivalent to 120-480mm on APS-C cameras. This versatility makes it suitable for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife and sports, while also providing flexibility for portraiture. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S has a fixed focal length of 50mm, which is considered a standard lens. While it excels in producing stunning images with beautiful background blur, it lacks the zoom capability that the Canon lens provides, limiting its versatility for varied shooting conditions.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
With a variable aperture of f/4-5.6, the Canon RF 75-300mm may not perform as well in low-light conditions compared to the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S, which features a wider f/1.8 aperture. This broader aperture allows the Nikon lens to gather more light, making it ideal for shooting in dim environments and achieving a shallower depth of field. The Canon lens, while capable, may require higher ISO settings or slower shutter speeds in low light, potentially impacting image quality. Thus, if low-light performance is crucial for your photography, the Nikon lens has a clear advantage.
Autofocus Technology
The autofocus systems of both lenses cater to different needs. The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens utilizes a DC motor for responsive and accurate autofocus, making it suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects in sports or wildlife photography. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S features a new ultra-quiet stepping motor, which excels in silent focusing, ideal for videography or shooting in quiet environments. While both lenses offer reliable autofocus, the choice depends on whether speed or silence is more critical for your photography style.
Image Quality and Construction
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 is designed with optical quality in mind, incorporating Canon’s Super Spectra Coating to minimize lens flare and ghosting. This ensures high contrast and color fidelity, even in challenging lighting. The lens also boasts a close-focusing capability of 4.9 feet, enabling semi-macro photography. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S is engineered for extreme sharpness and virtually zero distortion across the frame, making it a strong contender for those seeking the highest image quality. Its construction further enhances durability, making it a reliable choice for everyday use.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 is priced at $253.95, making it about 55% cheaper than the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S, which costs $566.95. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious photographers or those who are just starting out. While the Nikon lens offers superior low-light performance and image quality, the Canon lens provides excellent value for those who need a versatile telephoto option without breaking the bank. Ultimately, the decision may hinge on how much one values the features offered by the Nikon lens in relation to the price premium.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you require a versatile zoom lens capable of handling various subjects, the Canon lens is an excellent choice, especially given its affordability. Conversely, if low-light performance and image quality are your top priorities, the Nikon lens justifies its higher price with its advanced features and superior optical performance. Each lens has its strengths, so consider your shooting style and budget before making a decision.

