vsversusfinder

Canon RF 75- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 75- wins on price and focal length, Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12- wins on stabilization and close focus.

The Canon RF 75-300mm lens offers better value and versatility for distant subjects, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm excels in wide-angle capabilities and stabilization.

Why Canon RF 75- is better

Price

Canon lens is significantly cheaper.

Focal Range

Longer focal length for distant subjects.

Weight

Lighter and more portable.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12- is better

Image Stabilization

Nikon lens has built-in VR.

Close Focus

Nikon lens can focus closer.

Zoom Control

Nikon lens offers power zoom functionality.

Overall score

Canon RF 75-
75
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-
82

Specifications

SpecCanon RF 75-Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-
Aperturef/4-5.6f/3.5-5.6
Max Zoom300mm28mm
Min Focus4.9ft11in
Image StabilizationNoYes
AutofocusDC MotorPower Zoom

Dimension comparison

Canon RF 75-Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-

Price Comparison

The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is priced at $253.95, making it about 31% cheaper than the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR, which retails for $366.95. This significant price difference could be a decisive factor for photographers on a budget. While both lenses offer unique features tailored to different photography styles, the Canon lens provides a more economical option without sacrificing essential functionalities. The lower price of the Canon lens may appeal to casual photographers or those looking to expand their gear without a hefty investment.

Focal Length Versatility

The Canon RF 75-300mm lens offers a versatile focal length range of 75-300mm (120-480mm equivalent on APS-C), ideal for sports, wildlife, and portraits. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm lens has a much wider angle, ranging from 12mm to 28mm, making it suitable for landscapes and vlogging. These distinct focal ranges cater to different styles of photography. If you often find yourself capturing distant subjects or need a lens for portraiture, the Canon lens is the superior choice. However, for creators focused on immersive landscapes or architectural shots, the Nikon lens shines with its ultra-wide capabilities.

Autofocus Performance

Both lenses offer effective autofocus features tailored to their respective uses. The Canon RF 75-300mm lens employs a responsive DC motor for accurate focusing, which is essential for capturing fast-moving subjects like sports and wildlife. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm lens incorporates a power zoom function that allows users to select from 11 different speeds, providing precise control over zooming. While the Canon lens excels in fast-paced scenarios, the Nikon lens’s zoom capabilities may benefit content creators seeking flexibility. Depending on your shooting style, one autofocus system may suit your needs better than the other.

Image Stabilization

The Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm lens includes built-in VR (Vibration Reduction) image stabilization, offering up to 4.5 stops of stabilization. This feature is particularly beneficial for shooting in low-light conditions or while zooming. Conversely, the Canon RF 75-300mm lens does not mention any image stabilization features. For photographers who frequently shoot handheld or in challenging lighting, the Nikon lens provides a significant advantage, helping to reduce blur and enhance image sharpness. If stability is a priority in your photography, the Nikon lens will likely be the better option.

Build and Portability

The Canon RF 75-300mm lens weighs just over 1 lb and features a compact design, making it travel-friendly and easy to handle. Its modest 58mm front filter thread adds to its portability. The Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm lens is also designed with a lightweight build, suitable for vlogging and on-the-go shooting. Both lenses are crafted for convenience, but the Canon lens’s longer focal range paired with a lightweight structure could make it more appealing for photographers who prioritize mobility without compromising on zoom capabilities.

Close-Focusing Ability

The Canon RF 75-300mm lens has a minimum focusing distance of 4.9 feet, along with a maximum magnification of 0.25x, allowing for semi-macro shots. This feature is advantageous for photographers looking to capture detailed close-ups of distant subjects. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm lens boasts a close focus distance of just 11 inches, making it ideal for capturing subjects up close, such as in product photography or detailed vlogging shots. Depending on your creative vision, either lens may offer unique advantages in close-up photography.

Target Audience

The Canon RF 75-300mm lens is tailored for sports, wildlife, travel, and everyday photography, appealing to photographers who need versatility in distant shooting. Its economical price point makes it attractive for those just starting or looking to expand their equipment without a significant financial commitment. The Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm lens, on the other hand, is designed with content creators and vloggers in mind, thanks to its ultra-wide-angle capabilities and power zoom feature. This lens is better suited for those focusing on immersive visuals and wide landscapes, making it an essential tool for digital content production.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens and the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR comes down to your specific photography needs and priorities. If you seek a lightweight telephoto option for distant subjects at a lower price point, the Canon lens stands out as the more economical choice. However, if your focus is on wide-angle shots, vlogging, or content creation, the Nikon lens offers superior versatility and stabilization features. Assess your photography style and budget to determine which lens aligns with your creative goals.