Canon RF 75- vs Tamron 150-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF 75- wins on price and close-focus, Tamron 150- wins on focal length and build quality.
The Canon RF 75-300mm lens is a budget-friendly option for versatile photography, while the Tamron 150-500mm lens excels in ultra-telephoto capabilities and advanced features.
Why Canon RF 75- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $253.95.
Weight
Canon is lighter at just over 1 lb.
Close-Focus
Canon can focus as close as 4.9 feet.
Why Tamron 150- is better
Focal Length
Tamron extends to 500mm for greater reach.
Autofocus
Tamron features high-speed VXD autofocus.
Image Stabilization
Tamron includes VC for better stability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF 75- | Tamron 150- |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/5-6.7 |
| Min Focus | 4.9 ft | 23.6 in |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Autofocus Type | DC Motor | VXD |
| Max Focal | 300mm | 500mm |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens is significantly more affordable than the Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD Lens, priced at $253.95 compared to $1,199.00. This represents a price difference of approximately 79%, making the Canon lens a budget-friendly option for photographers looking for a versatile telephoto zoom. The Canon lens is appealing for those who want to capture sports, wildlife, and everyday moments without breaking the bank, while the Tamron lens, with its higher price tag, offers specialized features for serious photographers focused on ultra-telephoto shooting.
Focal Length Versatility
The Tamron 150-500mm lens offers a broader focal length range, extending to 500mm compared to the Canon's 300mm. This makes the Tamron ideal for users who need that extra reach, especially when photographing distant subjects like wildlife or sports. On APS-C cameras, the Tamron provides an equivalent focal length of 225-750mm, which is a substantial advantage for ultra-telephoto needs. In contrast, while the Canon's range of 75-300mm (120-480mm equivalent) is versatile for many situations, it falls short for those looking to maximize their telephoto capabilities.
Weight and Portability
The Canon RF 75-300mm lens weighs just over 1 lb, making it a lightweight option that is easy to carry for extended periods. This portability is a significant benefit for travel photographers or those who frequently move between shooting locations. The Tamron lens, although designed for handheld shooting, is bulkier due to its larger zoom range, which may impact comfort during long sessions. Thus, for those prioritizing lightweight gear, the Canon lens stands out as an excellent choice.
Autofocus Performance
Both lenses feature advanced autofocus systems, but the Tamron lens boasts a high-speed, high-precision autofocus mechanism thanks to its VXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive) technology. This allows for quick and quiet focusing, making it suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects. On the other hand, the Canon lens uses a DC motor to provide responsive autofocus, which is reliable but may not match the speed of the Tamron in demanding scenarios. Photographers focused on action shots may appreciate the Tamron's enhanced autofocus capabilities.
Image Stabilization Features
The Tamron 150-500mm lens includes VC (Vibration Compensation) image stabilization, which is crucial for shooting at longer focal lengths, particularly in low-light situations or when handheld. This feature significantly enhances stability and reduces blur, making it a strong contender for wildlife and sports photography. The Canon lens does not mention any specific image stabilization technology, which could be a disadvantage for users planning to shoot at its maximum focal length without a tripod. Therefore, for those who often shoot in challenging conditions, the Tamron may provide a superior experience.
Close-Focusing Capabilities
In terms of close-focusing abilities, the Canon RF 75-300mm lens can focus as close as 4.9 feet, allowing for semi-macro shooting and detailed close-ups. This capability makes it versatile for capturing portraits with beautiful background blur, thanks to its seven-blade rounded diaphragm which enhances bokeh quality. The Tamron lens, while capable of impressive close-ups at 23.6 inches at the 150mm end, does not provide the same level of detail in semi-macro situations. Thus, the Canon lens may be more appealing for those interested in creative close-up photography.
Build Quality and Design
Tamron's 150-500mm lens is designed as a full-featured, ultra-telephoto zoom for full-frame mirrorless cameras, reflecting a robust build quality suited for professional use. Its compact design allows for comfortable handheld shooting, which is essential for long sessions. Meanwhile, the Canon RF 75-300mm lens, while lightweight and portable, may not possess the same level of durability under strenuous conditions. Therefore, professional photographers might prefer the sturdiness of the Tamron lens for rigorous shooting environments.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens and the Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD Lens should hinge on your specific photography needs. If budget is a primary concern and you require a lightweight, versatile lens for everyday use, the Canon lens is the clear winner at $253.95. However, if you seek superior telephoto capabilities, enhanced autofocus performance, and image stabilization for dynamic shooting scenarios, the Tamron lens, despite its higher price of $1,199.00, may be worth the investment. Assess your priorities—whether they lean towards budget, portability, or specialized features—to make the best decision for your photography endeavors.

