vsversusfinder

Canon RF vs Canon RF100-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF wins on macro, Canon RF100- wins on weight and size.

The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM excels in portrait and macro photography, while the RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM offers greater versatility for wildlife and sports. Choose based on your specific photography needs.

Why Canon RF is better

Aperture

RF 85mm has a bright f/2 aperture for low-light performance

Macro

RF 85mm offers macro capabilities with 0.5x magnification

Weight

RF 85mm is lighter and more compact for travel

Why Canon RF100- is better

Zoom Range

RF100-400mm covers 100-400mm for versatile shooting

Stabilization

RF100-400mm achieves up to 6 stops of stabilization

Autofocus

RF100-400mm features fast Nano USM autofocus technology

Overall score

Canon RF
85
Canon RF100-
90

Specifications

SpecCanon RFCanon RF100-
Price$589.00$699.00
Max Aperturef/2f/5.6-8
Min Focus1.15 ft2.89 ft
Max Magnification0.5x0.41x
Stabilization5 stops5.5-6 stops

Dimension comparison

Canon RFCanon RF100-

Overview of the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM and Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM

The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM is priced at $589.00, while the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is slightly more expensive at $699.00, making it about 18.7% pricier. Both lenses are designed for Canon's EOS R series cameras, offering unique advantages for different photography needs. The RF 85mm is a versatile medium-telephoto lens ideal for portraits and macro photography, while the RF100-400mm is a telephoto zoom lens that excels in wildlife and sports photography due to its extended focal range.

Image Quality and Performance

Both lenses offer impressive optical performance, but they cater to different photographic styles. The RF 85mm boasts a bright f/2 aperture, which not only contributes to stunning bokeh but also enhances performance in low-light conditions. This lens features optical image stabilization providing up to 5 stops of shake correction, making it an excellent choice for handheld shooting. In contrast, the RF100-400mm provides a versatile zoom range, allowing photographers to capture distant subjects with clarity. It incorporates an optical image stabilizer with up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, and when paired with EOS R series cameras featuring In-Body Image Stabilization, it can achieve up to 6 stops of stabilization. This makes both lenses suitable for their intended uses, but the RF100-400mm shines in capturing fast-moving subjects.

Focal Length and Versatility

The focal length of each lens significantly impacts its usability. The RF 85mm offers a fixed focal length, making it ideal for portraiture and close-up photography, with a minimum focusing distance of just 1.15 feet. This allows photographers to achieve high-quality macro shots with a maximum magnification of 0.5x. On the other hand, the RF100-400mm provides a much broader focal range from 100mm to 400mm, making it extremely versatile for various genres, including wildlife and sports photography. Its capability to accept RF tele extenders further enhances its focal length, reaching up to 800mm, which is a distinct advantage for photographers needing extreme zoom capabilities.

Build and Design

In terms of design, both lenses prioritize portability and ease of use. The RF 85mm is lightweight and compact, designed for photographers who favor mobility without sacrificing quality. Its control ring allows for quick adjustments, making it user-friendly during shoots. Conversely, the RF100-400mm is also compact and lightweight for a telephoto zoom lens, yet it brings a more robust construction suitable for outdoor and action photography. This lens also includes a control ring for fast setting changes, ensuring that photographers can adapt quickly to changing environments.

Autofocus Capabilities

Autofocus performance is critical for capturing sharp images, especially in dynamic environments. The RF 85mm features a fast and accurate autofocus system, ensuring that subjects are sharp and in focus, particularly useful for portraits. The RF100-400mm, however, takes autofocus performance a step further with Canon's Nano USM technology, which provides high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus. This feature is particularly beneficial in wildlife and sports photography, where quick focus adjustments are essential for capturing fleeting moments.

Price Comparison and Value

The RF 85mm is priced at $589.00, which can be considered a good investment for photographers focusing on portraits and macro shots. The RF100-400mm, at $699.00, comes with a broader range of capabilities but at a higher price. The additional $110 spent on the RF100-400mm may be justified for those who require the flexibility of a zoom lens for different shooting scenarios. When considering the intended use, the RF 85mm provides excellent value for those specializing in portrait and macro photography, while the RF100-400mm offers greater versatility for outdoor and action photography.

Ideal Use Cases

When deciding between these two lenses, it's crucial to consider your photographic style. The RF 85mm is ideal for portrait photographers who value low-light performance and beautiful bokeh, making it perfect for events like weddings or intimate portraits. On the other hand, the RF100-400mm is tailored for wildlife or sports enthusiasts who need to capture distant subjects quickly and clearly. Its versatility and extended focal range make it a better choice for those who often shoot in dynamic environments where flexibility is key.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM and the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM comes down to your specific needs as a photographer. If you primarily shoot portraits or macro photography and appreciate a bright aperture for low-light situations, the RF 85mm is an excellent choice at $589.00. However, if you require a lens that can cover a wider range of subjects, from wildlife to sports, the RF100-400mm, though more expensive at $699.00, offers the versatility and extended reach needed for those scenarios. Consider your photography style and budget carefully to make the best choice for your needs.