Canon RF vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - Black
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF wins on price and focal length, Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weight.
The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM excels in macro capabilities and image stabilization, while the Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR offers a more affordable and versatile option for everyday photography.
Why Canon RF is better
Macro Capabilities
Canon lens offers 0.5x magnification for close-up photography.
Image Stabilization
Canon lens features Optical Image Stabilization with up to 5 stops.
Aperture
Canon lens has a bright f/2 aperture for beautiful bokeh.
Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - Black is better
Price
Fujifilm lens is $90 cheaper.
Weight
Fujifilm lens weighs only 180g.
Weather Resistance
Fujifilm lens is weather and dust resistant.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF | Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - Black |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Fujifilm |
| Max Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
| Autofocus Speed | Not specified | 0.05s |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Macro Capability | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Introduction
When it comes to enhancing your photography skills, choosing the right lens can make all the difference. In this comparison, we will analyze the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM and the Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR, two standout options in the camera lens category. While both lenses are designed to meet the needs of photographers, they cater to different styles and subjects, making it essential to understand their distinct features and capabilities.
Price Comparison
The price of the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM is $589.00, while the Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR is priced at $499.00, making the Fujifilm lens about 17% cheaper. This price difference can be a significant factor for photographers who are budget-conscious or are just starting. Despite the higher price, the Canon lens offers macro capabilities and optical image stabilization, which may justify the expense for those looking to shoot portraits and close-up photography.
Build Quality and Design
Both lenses boast impressive build quality, but their designs cater to different shooting environments. The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR is particularly notable for its weather and dust-resistant construction, allowing it to operate in temperatures as low as -10 degrees Celsius. This makes it a reliable choice for outdoor photographers who often shoot in challenging conditions. On the other hand, the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM is lightweight and compact, making it an excellent travel companion, especially for portrait and street photography.
Optical Performance
Optical performance is crucial for any lens, and both the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM and the Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR deliver exceptional image quality. The Canon lens features a bright f/2 aperture that offers beautiful bokeh and a maximum magnification of 0.5x, making it ideal for macro photography. In contrast, the Fujifilm lens comprises ten elements in six groups, including two aspherical elements, ensuring edge-to-edge sharpness. For those who value close-up capabilities, the Canon lens has a significant advantage.
Autofocus Capabilities
Autofocus performance can greatly affect your shooting experience, and both lenses are equipped with fast and efficient autofocus systems. The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR excels with its fast and silent autofocus, capable of focusing in just 0.05 seconds when paired with compatible Fujifilm cameras like the X-Pro2 or X-T2. While the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM does not specify its autofocus speed, it is designed for quick adjustments, especially when coupled with its built-in control ring for direct setting changes.
Versatility in Photography
Versatility is a key consideration for photographers, and both lenses serve different purposes effectively. The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM is perfect for portraits, street photography, and low-light situations, thanks to its f/2 aperture and macro capabilities. This lens is particularly beneficial for those who want to capture stunning images in various environments, including concerts or evening events. The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR, with its focal length equivalent to 35mm, is excellent for snapshots, landscapes, and portraits, making it a great all-around lens for everyday use.
Image Stabilization
Image stabilization is crucial for achieving sharp images, especially in low-light conditions or when shooting video. The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM features Optical Image Stabilization with up to 5 stops of shake correction, which is particularly useful when photographing at slower shutter speeds or shooting handheld. The Fujifilm lens does not specify any image stabilization technology, which may be a drawback for users who frequently find themselves in low-light scenarios or when trying to capture fast-moving subjects.
User Experience
The user experience can significantly impact how a photographer interacts with their gear. The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM includes a customizable control ring that allows for direct setting changes, enhancing usability for photographers who prefer quick adjustments. In contrast, the Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR is designed with compactness and lightweight in mind, weighing just 180g, which promotes ease of use and handling. The choice between the two will largely depend on personal preferences regarding usability and handling characteristics.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM and the Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR ultimately comes down to your specific photography needs. If you prioritize macro capabilities, optical image stabilization, and beautiful bokeh for portrait photography, the Canon lens, although pricier at $589.00, may be worth the investment. Conversely, if you're looking for a more affordable, versatile lens for everyday photography that can withstand challenging weather conditions, the Fujifilm lens at $499.00 is an excellent choice. Consider your shooting style, environment, and budget to make the best decision for your photography journey.

