Canon RF vs TTARTISAN AF
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF wins on weight and length, TTARTISAN AF wins on aperture.
The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM excels in optical performance and build quality, while the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 offers great portability and affordability.
Why Canon RF is better
Optical Quality
Superior macro capabilities and image stabilization.
Build Quality
Robust design for professional use.
Low-Light Performance
Better performance in low-light conditions.
Why TTARTISAN AF is better
Price
Significantly more affordable.
Portability
Ultra-compact pancake design.
Ease of Use
User-friendly for general photography.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF | TTARTISAN AF |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x | N/A |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Lenses
In the world of photography, choosing the right lens can be just as important as selecting the right camera body. In this comparison, we will examine the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM and the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 APS-C Frame Lens. These two lenses cater to different photographic needs and styles, offering distinct features and price points.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM is priced at $589.00, whereas the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 is significantly more affordable at $159.99. This makes the TTARTISAN about 73% cheaper than the Canon lens. While the Canon lens offers advanced macro capabilities and image stabilization, the price difference is substantial. For photographers on a budget or those just starting, the TTARTISAN presents a more accessible option without compromising too much on quality.
Optical Performance
The Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM is designed with a bright f/2 aperture, providing excellent bokeh and depth of field control. It also boasts a maximum magnification of 0.5x and a minimum focusing distance of 1.15 feet, making it ideal for portraits and macro photography. On the other hand, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8, while less specialized, offers a versatile focal length suitable for street photography and general use. However, it doesn't match the Canon's macro capabilities or its optical image stabilization, which is essential for low-light conditions.
Build Quality and Design
The Canon RF 85mm lens features a robust design that reflects its professional-grade status, aimed at full-frame mirrorless cameras. Its lightweight construction, combined with a customizable control ring, enhances usability for various shooting scenarios. In contrast, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm lens is an ultra-compact pancake lens, making it extremely portable and easy to carry, perfect for travel photography. While both lenses are designed with usability in mind, their build quality reflects their target audience and specific use cases.
Autofocus and Usability
The Canon lens is equipped with a sophisticated autofocus system that includes Optical Image Stabilization, allowing for up to 5 stops of shake correction. This feature is particularly beneficial for macro and low-light photography. Conversely, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm lens employs an STM stepping motor for smooth focusing, with added eye recognition focus capabilities. This makes it easier to capture sharp images of moving subjects, particularly in portraiture. Both lenses provide solid autofocus performance, but the Canon lens has the edge in stabilization.
Versatility in Photography
With its 85mm focal length, the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro is versatile, excelling in portrait and macro photography, as well as low-light environments. Its macro feature allows photographers to capture intricate details, making it an excellent choice for creative projects. Meanwhile, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 lens, with its 27mm focal length, offers a wider field of view, making it a great option for street photography and everyday shooting. Each lens serves distinct needs; the Canon lens is better suited for specialized photography, while the TTARTISAN is ideal for general use.
Brand Reputation
Canon is a well-established brand in the photography industry, known for producing high-quality lenses and cameras. The RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM is a testament to Canon's commitment to innovation and performance. On the other hand, TTARTISAN is a newer player that has gained attention for offering affordable yet high-quality lenses. While Canon's reputation provides a sense of reliability, TTARTISAN's recent emergence is marked by positive reviews, especially for those looking for budget-friendly options.
User Experience and Reviews
User reviews often highlight the Canon RF 85mm lens for its exceptional image quality, beautiful bokeh, and reliable autofocus in various conditions. However, it is also noted that its price point may be a barrier for some photographers. Conversely, users appreciate the TTARTISAN AF 27mm lens for its portability, ease of use, and affordability, even if it lacks some of the advanced features found in the Canon lens. The different user experiences reflect the distinct purposes each lens serves and the expectations users have based on their photographic needs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM and the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 boils down to your specific photography needs and budget. If you require a high-quality lens for portraits, macro photography, and low-light conditions, the Canon lens, despite its higher price, offers features that justify the investment. However, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option that excels in portability and general photography, the TTARTISAN lens is an attractive choice. Ultimately, both lenses have their strengths, making them suitable for different types of photographers.