Canon RF-S18- vs Sigma 17-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF-S18- wins on zoom range and focusing, Sigma 17- wins on price.
The Canon RF-S18-150mm offers better value and versatility, while the Sigma 17-40mm excels in low-light performance and image quality.
Why Canon RF-S18- is better
Price
Canon is $350 cheaper than Sigma.
Versatility
Canon covers a wider zoom range.
Image Stabilization
Canon has superior stabilization features.
Why Sigma 17- is better
Aperture
Sigma has a constant F1.8 aperture.
Image Quality
Sigma's Art-series optics deliver professional quality.
Low-Light Performance
Sigma performs better in low-light conditions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF-S18- | Sigma 17- |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Sigma |
| Current Price | $569.00 | $919.00 |
| Max Aperture | F3.5-6.3 | F1.8 |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus Type | STM | Art |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF-S18-150mm and Sigma 17-40mm
The Canon RF-S18-150mm is priced at $569.00, while the Sigma 17-40mm comes in at $919.00, making the Canon lens about 38% cheaper than its Sigma counterpart. Both lenses are designed for different camera systems, with the Canon tailored for APS-C cameras with an RF mount and the Sigma aimed at Sony E-mount APS-C cameras. Each lens offers unique features catering to various photography styles, making them suitable for different users.
Lens Design and Build Quality
The Canon RF-S18-150mm features a versatile zoom range from 18mm to 150mm, making it a practical choice for various shooting scenarios, from landscapes to portraits. Its compact design is optimized for APS-C sensors, and it offers automatic APS-C sensor cropping when used with full-frame EOS R-series cameras. On the other hand, the Sigma 17-40mm boasts a constant bright aperture of F1.8, ideal for low-light conditions and creative depth effects. Both lenses are built with quality in mind, but the Sigma’s Art-series optics are known for delivering exceptional detail and professional image quality, appealing to more discerning photographers.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Sigma 17-40mm stands out with its constant F1.8 aperture, allowing for excellent performance in low-light situations and the ability to create beautiful bokeh effects. This feature is particularly beneficial for portrait photography and creative work. In contrast, the Canon RF-S18-150mm has a variable aperture ranging from F3.5 to F6.3, which limits its performance in low-light environments but still offers solid versatility across its zoom range. For photographers who prioritize low-light capability and depth of field control, the Sigma lens is the clear winner.
Image Stabilization Features
Image stabilization is a critical consideration for many photographers, especially when shooting handheld. The Canon RF-S18-150mm incorporates in-lens optical image stabilization, providing up to 4.5 stops of shake correction and up to 6.5 stops when paired with compatible EOS R series cameras featuring In-Body Image Stabilizer (IBIS). This advanced stabilization makes it easier to capture sharp images in challenging conditions. The Sigma 17-40mm does not explicitly mention image stabilization, which may be a drawback for users who frequently shoot in dynamic or low-light environments where camera shake can be problematic.
Autofocus System
The autofocus capabilities of the Canon RF-S18-150mm are enhanced by its lead screw-type stepping motor (STM), which ensures smooth and quiet focusing—particularly important for video shooting. The lens provides 100% x 100% Dual Pixel CMOS AF coverage for APS-C sensors, ensuring quick and accurate focusing. The Sigma 17-40mm is less detailed in its autofocus technology, but being part of the Art series, it is designed for sharpness and clarity. For videographers and those who prioritize quiet operation, the Canon lens may have the edge due to its advanced autofocus system.
Versatility and Use Cases
The Canon RF-S18-150mm is marketed as an all-around lens, capable of handling landscapes, portraits, sports, and videos alike. Its wide zoom range and optical stabilization make it a practical choice for everyday use. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm, while versatile, leans more toward artistic and portrait photography due to its wide aperture and optical quality. Users looking for a single lens to cover various scenarios may prefer the Canon lens, while those focused on artistic shots could find the Sigma more appealing.
Pricing and Value
The price difference between the two lenses is significant, with the Canon RF-S18-150mm retailing at $569.00 and the Sigma 17-40mm priced at $919.00. This means users can expect to pay about $350 more for the Sigma lens. Given that both lenses target different photography needs, the Canon offers better value for those seeking an all-purpose lens without breaking the bank. However, for photographers focused on low-light performance and professional image quality, the investment in the Sigma may be justified.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF-S18-150mm and the Sigma 17-40mm ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you are looking for a versatile, budget-friendly option that offers good image stabilization, a wide zoom range, and reliable autofocus for both photos and videos, the Canon RF-S18-150mm is the better choice at $569. However, if low-light performance, a constant aperture, and superior image quality are your top priorities, and you are willing to invest more, the Sigma 17-40mm at $919 could be worth the extra cost. Each lens has its strengths, and your decision should align with your shooting style and budget.

