Canon RF100- vs Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on focal length and weight, Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on magnification.
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is the superior choice for telephoto photography, while the RF35mm F1.8 IS Macro STM Lens offers versatility at a lower price.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Zoom Range
100-400mm vs 35mm
Autofocus
Advanced Nano USM technology
Stabilization
Up to 6 stops with EOS R series
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Price
$499.00 vs $699.00
Macro Capability
0.5x magnification
Compactness
Smaller and lighter design
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100- | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Canon |
| Type | Telephoto | Macro |
| Max Aperture | F5.6-8 | F1.8 |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Autofocus | Nano USM | STM |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is a versatile telephoto lens designed for wildlife and sports photography. Priced at $699.00, this lens offers a wide zoom range from 100mm to 400mm, making it ideal for capturing distant subjects. It features an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, which is further enhanced to 6 stops when used with compatible EOS R series cameras that have In-Body Image Stabilization. This lens is compact and lightweight, making it suitable for travel, and it includes advanced autofocus technology for quick and silent focusing.
Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 IS Macro STM Lens
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 IS Macro STM Lens is a compact macro lens priced at $499.00. With a 0.5x magnification ratio, it is perfect for both wide-angle shots and macro photography. This lens offers a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 feet, allowing users to get up close to their subjects. It also includes Optical Image Stabilization with up to 5 stops of shake correction, ensuring steady images in various lighting conditions. The RF35mm lens is designed to work seamlessly with EOS R series cameras, providing a control ring for quick adjustments to settings.
Price Comparison
When comparing the prices of these two lenses, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 IS Macro STM Lens is about 17% cheaper at $499.00, while the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is priced at $699.00. This price difference of $200 may influence your decision depending on your budget and photographic needs. If you’re looking for a more economical option primarily for general photography or close-up work, the RF35mm lens offers substantial savings without sacrificing quality.
Versatility in Photography
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM excels in versatility, particularly for photographers focused on wildlife, sports, or travel. Its extensive zoom range allows you to capture subjects from a distance without needing to physically approach them. In contrast, the RF35mm F1.8 is more suited for general and macro photography, giving you the ability to shoot wide-angle and close-up images with a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 feet. Therefore, if your photography primarily involves distant subjects, the telephoto lens is the clear choice, while the macro lens is preferable for versatility in different shooting scenarios.
Image Stabilization Features
Both lenses feature Optical Image Stabilization, but the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM offers slightly greater shake correction capabilities, providing up to 6 stops when paired with certain EOS R series cameras. This advantage is critical for telephoto photography, where camera shake can significantly impact image quality. The RF35mm F1.8 lens provides up to 5 stops of stabilization, which is excellent for handheld shooting but may not be as critical for macro or wide-angle photography. Thus, if stabilization is a priority for your shooting style, the RF100-400mm lens may be the superior option.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus system in the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM utilizes Canon’s Nano USM technology, which is designed for high speed, smoothness, and quiet operation. This is particularly advantageous for capturing fast-moving subjects in wildlife or sports photography. On the other hand, while the RF35mm F1.8 also offers reliable autofocus, it does not explicitly mention similar advanced technology. Therefore, if fast and silent autofocus is a necessity for your photography, the RF100-400mm lens stands out in this category.
Ideal Use Cases
When considering ideal use cases, the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is tailored for outdoor photography, especially wildlife and sports, due to its telephoto capabilities. The lens's design enables photographers to maintain distance while still obtaining sharp images of fast-moving subjects. Alternatively, the RF35mm F1.8 is perfect for street photography, portraits, and macro work, providing flexibility in various settings. Therefore, your choice should hinge on your primary photography interests and the types of subjects you capture most frequently.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Canon RF35mm F1.8 IS Macro STM Lens ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a lens for distant subjects and value advanced stabilization and autofocus capabilities, the RF100-400mm is worth the higher investment at $699.00. However, if you are looking for a more versatile and budget-friendly option for general and macro photography, the RF35mm at $499.00 is an excellent choice. Each lens excels in different areas, so consider what features matter most for your photography style before making a decision.

