Canon RF100- vs Canon RF70-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on price and portability, Canon RF70- wins on aperture and durability.
The Canon RF100-400mm offers great value for budget-conscious photographers, while the RF70-200mm excels in low-light performance and build quality.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Price
RF100-400mm is significantly cheaper at $699.
Weight
RF100-400mm is lighter and more portable.
Zoom Range
RF100-400mm offers a longer focal length.
Why Canon RF70- is better
Aperture
RF70-200mm has a faster f/2.8 aperture.
Autofocus
RF70-200mm features dual Nano USM for faster focusing.
Durability
RF70-200mm has weather and dust resistance.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100- | Canon RF70- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 100-400mm | 70-200mm |
| Max Aperture | f/5.6-8 | f/2.8 |
| Image Stabilization | 5.5 stops | 5 stops |
| Minimum Focus | 2.89 ft | 2.3 ft |
| Autofocus Type | Nano USM | Dual Nano USM |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is a versatile telephoto lens that offers a significant zoom range, making it ideal for wildlife, sports, and travel photography. Priced at $699.00, this lens is compact and lightweight, designed specifically for EOS R series cameras. It features an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, enhancing image stability and clarity. With a minimum focusing distance of 2.89 feet at 200mm and a maximum magnification of 0.41x at 400mm, this lens is perfect for capturing distant subjects in stunning detail.
Overview of the Canon RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens
The Canon RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens is a premium telephoto zoom lens that costs $2,799.00. It boasts a fast f/2.8 aperture, providing excellent low-light performance and allowing for shallow depth of field effects. This lens is engineered for use with Canon's EOS R series cameras, ensuring high image quality and durability. It features a minimum focusing distance of 2.3 feet, making it suitable for a variety of photography styles, including portraits and sports. With dual Nano USM technology for silent autofocus and 5 stops of shake correction, this lens is designed for professional use in challenging environments.
Price Comparison
When comparing prices, the Canon RF100-400mm is significantly more affordable at $699.00, which is about 75% less than the RF70-200mm priced at $2,799.00. This price difference may appeal to photographers on a budget or those who are just starting in telephoto photography. While the RF70-200mm offers advanced features and superior performance due to its f/2.8 aperture, the RF100-400mm provides excellent value for those who require a longer focal length without the high price tag.
Image Quality and Performance
Both lenses excel in image quality, but they cater to different photographic needs. The Canon RF100-400mm features a single Ultra Low Dispersion lens element that minimizes chromatic aberration, ensuring crisp and colorful images throughout its zoom range. This lens is particularly beneficial for capturing detailed wildlife shots from a distance. In contrast, the RF70-200mm, with its bright f/2.8 aperture, delivers outstanding sharpness and clarity, making it ideal for portrait and sports photography. While the RF100-400mm provides versatility in focal length, the RF70-200mm stands out in low-light conditions and offers a professional edge.
Autofocus Capabilities
The autofocus systems in both lenses are advanced and efficient, but they utilize different technologies. The RF100-400mm employs Canon's Nano USM for fast, smooth, and quiet autofocus, making it suitable for capturing moving subjects without distracting noise. The RF70-200mm takes this further with dual Nano USM motors that enhance autofocus speed and accuracy even more. This difference can be crucial for photographers who often work in dynamic environments, such as sports events or wildlife photography, where quick focusing is essential.
Weight and Portability
In terms of weight and portability, the Canon RF100-400mm is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it easier to carry for long periods, which is a significant advantage for travel photography. The RF70-200mm, while still manageable, is heavier due to its robust build quality and larger aperture. Photographers who prioritize portability may find the RF100-400mm more appealing, especially for outdoor excursions where every ounce counts.
Build Quality and Durability
Both lenses are built to withstand the rigors of professional use, but the RF70-200mm offers additional features such as weather and dust resistance, making it more suitable for challenging shooting conditions. This durability can be a deciding factor for photographers who frequently shoot in unpredictable environments. The RF100-400mm, while well-constructed, does not have the same level of environmental sealing, which may deter some professionals who require rugged gear.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Canon RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective lens with a longer zoom range for wildlife or travel photography, the RF100-400mm at $699.00 is an excellent choice. However, if you require superior low-light performance, faster autofocus, and a more durable lens for professional use, the RF70-200mm, despite its higher price of $2,799.00, offers unparalleled quality and versatility.

