vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on weight and focal length, Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weather seal.

The Canon RF100-400mm offers superior versatility and stabilization for distant subjects, while the Fujinon XF35mmF2 excels in portability and weather resistance.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Zoom Range

Canon has a versatile 100-400mm zoom range.

Stabilization

Canon offers up to 6 stops of image stabilization.

Autofocus

Canon features fast and quiet Nano USM autofocus.

Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better

Price

Fujinon is $250 cheaper.

Weather Resistance

Fujinon has a weather-resistant design.

Compactness

Fujinon is more portable and lightweight.

Overall score

Canon RF100-
85
Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
Max ApertureF5.6-8F2.0
Min Focus Dist.2.89 ft13 in
BokehStandardCircular
Image QualityHighVery High
Max Magnification0.41x0.17x

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black

Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is a versatile telephoto lens priced at $699.00. It is designed for wildlife, sports, and travel photography, making it a suitable choice for photographers who require a long focal length. With a zoom range of 100-400mm, this lens allows users to capture distant subjects with remarkable clarity. Its compact and lightweight design enhances portability, an essential feature for outdoor shooting. The lens also boasts optical image stabilization, providing up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, which is further enhanced to 6 stops when used with compatible EOS R series cameras featuring In-Body Image Stabilization.

Overview of the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is a prime lens available at a price of $449.00. This lens is ideal for street and portrait photography, offering a focal length equivalent to 53mm in 35mm format. Its weather-resistant design, equipped with eight sealing points, ensures reliable operation in challenging environments, as low as 14 degrees Fahrenheit. The lens features a fast autofocus system, achieving focus in just 0.08 seconds, which is crucial for capturing fleeting moments. Additionally, the nine-blade aperture creates smooth, circular bokeh, enhancing the aesthetic quality of images.

Price Comparison

When comparing the prices of these two lenses, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is approximately 36% cheaper than the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM, with a price difference of $250.00. The Canon lens's higher price reflects its longer focal range and advanced stabilization features, which may be essential for specific photography needs. Meanwhile, the Fujinon lens provides excellent value for those who prioritize portability and weather resistance without the need for a telephoto zoom. This significant price disparity may influence budget-conscious photographers when choosing between the two.

Image Quality and Performance

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is designed to deliver high-image quality with its ultra-low dispersion lens element, which minimizes chromatic aberration throughout its zoom range. This results in crisp and colorful images with minimal color blur, particularly beneficial for wildlife photography where detail is crucial. In contrast, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR also excels in image quality, offering sharp images with rich bokeh due to its maximum aperture of F2.0. Both lenses provide impressive optical performance, yet the choice may depend on the specific photographic context—telephoto versus prime.

Autofocus and Usability

The autofocus capabilities of both lenses cater to different photographic scenarios. The Canon RF100-400mm features Canon’s Nano USM technology, enabling fast, smooth, and quiet focusing, which is essential for capturing action shots without disturbing the scene. The lens's minimum focusing distance is 2.89 feet at 200mm, allowing for a maximum magnification of 0.41x at 400mm, suitable for wildlife and sports. Conversely, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR achieves a focus speed of just 0.08 seconds with its inner focus system, making it an excellent choice for street photography and spontaneous moments. The usability of both lenses is high, but their effectiveness may vary based on the shooting environment.

Build Quality and Design

The build quality of the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is particularly noteworthy due to its weather-resistant construction featuring eight sealing points. This design allows for reliable operation in adverse weather conditions, appealing to outdoor photographers. The compact size of this lens enhances its portability, making it easy to carry around for extended periods. The Canon RF100-400mm, while slightly bulkier, offers a robust design that is still lighter than many traditional telephoto lenses. Its control ring allows for quick adjustments to settings, providing convenience during shoots. Each lens has merits in terms of design; the choice will depend on the photographer's prioritization of weather resistance versus zoom versatility.

Ideal Use Cases

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is particularly suited for photographers who focus on distant subjects, such as wildlife or sports. Its extended zoom range enables users to capture detail from afar, while the stabilization features help maintain clarity in dynamic situations. On the other hand, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is ideal for street photographers and those who enjoy portrait work, thanks to its fast autofocus and ability to create beautiful bokeh. The broader application of the Canon lens may appeal to outdoor enthusiasts, while the Fujinon lens caters to those who require a dependable, all-weather option for everyday photography.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boils down to your specific photography needs and budget. If you're looking for versatility in focal length and advanced stabilization features for distant subjects, the Canon lens may be the better choice, albeit at a higher price. However, if you prioritize portability, weather resistance, and a lower price point, the Fujinon lens stands out as an excellent option. Each lens has its strengths, and aligning those with your photographic goals will lead to the best decision.