vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on zoom and stabilization, Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- wins on price.

The Canon RF100-400mm offers superior features and performance, making it ideal for serious photographers, while the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR provides excellent value for casual users.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Zoom Range

Canon offers a longer zoom range of 100-400mm.

Image Stabilization

Canon provides up to 6 stops of stabilization.

Autofocus

Canon features faster and quieter autofocus.

Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- is better

Price

Nikon is significantly cheaper at $254.

Weight

Nikon is slightly heavier but still portable.

Warranty

Nikon comes with a 90-day warranty.

Overall score

Canon RF100-
88
Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-
72

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-
Focal Length100-400mm55-300mm
Max Aperturef/5.6-8f/4.5-5.6
Image StabilizationUp to 6 stopsUp to 4 stops
Autofocus TypeNano USMSWM
Weight1.48 lbs1.75 lbs

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-

Price Comparison

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is priced at $699.00, while the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G is significantly cheaper at $254.00. This makes the Nikon lens about 63% less expensive than the Canon option. For those on a tighter budget, the Nikon lens presents an attractive choice, especially for casual photographers looking to capture distant subjects without breaking the bank. The price difference could be a decisive factor for many, particularly those who are just starting in photography or those who do not require the advanced features offered by the Canon lens.

Zoom Range and Versatility

In terms of zoom capabilities, the Canon RF100-400mm offers a wide-reaching range from 100mm to 400mm, making it ideal for wildlife and sports photography. This versatility allows for significant subject magnification, reaching up to a maximum effective focal length of 800mm when used with tele extenders. In contrast, the Nikon lens has a shorter zoom range of 55mm to 300mm, translating to an equivalent focal length of 82.5mm to 450mm in full-frame format. While the Nikon lens is adequate for general photography, it falls short for users needing the extensive reach provided by the Canon lens, making the latter the better choice for specialized applications.

Image Stabilization Features

The image stabilization capabilities of both lenses are noteworthy, but they differ in effectiveness. The Canon RF100-400mm features an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction. When paired with EOS R series cameras that have In-Body Image Stabilization, users can enjoy up to 6 stops of stabilization. On the other hand, the Nikon lens utilizes its VR II Image Stabilization, allowing for handheld shooting at up to 4 shutter speeds slower than normal. This means that while both lenses help reduce blur from camera shake, the Canon lens offers a superior stabilization system, particularly beneficial for shooting at longer focal lengths.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus performance is a critical aspect for many photographers, and here the Canon RF100-400mm excels with its fast, smooth, and quiet autofocus powered by Canon’s Nano USM technology. This feature is particularly valuable for wildlife and sports photographers who need to capture quick-moving subjects. The Nikon lens also boasts a Silent Wave Motor (SWM) for autofocus, allowing for quiet operation. However, the Canon's autofocus system is designed for high speed and precision, making it more suitable for demanding shooting scenarios where every moment counts.

Build Quality and Portability

When it comes to build quality and portability, both lenses have their strengths. The Canon RF100-400mm is compact and lightweight, designed for easy handling during extended shoots. This makes it an excellent option for travel photography, where weight is a concern. Conversely, the Nikon lens is also compact but slightly heavier due to its design and the inclusion of extra-low dispersion elements. While both lenses are portable, the Canon’s lighter build provides an edge for photographers who prioritize mobility during outdoor shoots.

Target Audience

The Canon RF100-400mm is tailored for serious photographers who require a high-performance telephoto lens for specialized applications such as wildlife and sports photography. Its advanced features, such as superior image stabilization, extended zoom capabilities, and fast autofocus, make it suitable for professional use. In contrast, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm is designed for amateur photographers and those who need a reliable lens for general photography without the need for extensive zoom or advanced features. Its lower price point also makes it accessible for those new to photography.

Brand Reliability and Warranty

Both Canon and Nikon are reputable brands with a long history in the photography market. The Canon RF100-400mm lens comes with a high level of reliability typically associated with Canon products, known for their robust construction and excellent optical performance. Meanwhile, the Nikon lens is a certified refurbished product with a 90-day warranty, which provides some assurance of quality and reliability, though it may not hold the same prestige as a new Canon lens. Photographers may consider brand reputation and warranty as additional factors in their purchasing decision, especially when investing in a lens.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ultimately hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you are a serious photographer looking for advanced features, exceptional image quality, and superior zoom capabilities, the Canon lens is the clear winner despite its higher price of $699.00. However, if you are an amateur photographer seeking a more budget-friendly option for general photography, the Nikon lens at $254.00 provides excellent value without sacrificing essential performance. Therefore, your choice should align with your photographic goals and financial considerations.