vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on price and autofocus, Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- wins on close focus and zoom.

The Canon RF100-400mm offers great value for budget-conscious photographers, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm provides versatility and a broader zoom range.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Price

Canon is $597.95 cheaper.

Telephoto

Canon is better for wildlife and sports.

Autofocus

Canon's Nano USM is faster for stills.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- is better

Zoom Range

Nikon covers 28mm to 400mm.

Weight

Nikon is the lightest in its class.

Close Focus

Nikon has a minimum focus distance of 0.2m.

Overall score

Canon RF100-
85
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-
78

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-
Current Price$699.00$1296.95
Zoom Range100-400mm28-400mm
Min Focus2.89 ft0.2 m
WeightN/A1.6 lbs
Stabilization5.5 stops5.0 stops

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-

Price Comparison

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 is USM is significantly more affordable than the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Mirrorless Lens, priced at $699.00 compared to $1,296.95. This price difference of $597.95 means that the Canon lens is about 46% cheaper. For photographers on a budget or those just starting, the price point of the Canon lens makes it a more accessible option without sacrificing quality.

Zoom Range

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR offers a broader zoom range than the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8, covering focal lengths from 28mm to 400mm. This gives Nikon users a versatile 14.2x zoom, making it ideal for capturing a wide array of subjects, from landscapes to wildlife. On the other hand, the Canon lens provides a 100-400mm range, which is better suited for telephoto needs but lacks the wide-angle capability that the Nikon lens delivers.

Image Stabilization

While both lenses offer impressive image stabilization, the Nikon lens has a slight edge in this category. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm features Stable VR performance equivalent to a 5.0-stop increase in shutter speed and can achieve up to 5.5-stop stabilization when paired with compatible cameras. Comparatively, the Canon RF100-400mm provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction with EOS R series cameras featuring In-Body Image Stabilization, but only up to 6 stops when used in tandem with specific models. This makes both lenses reliable for handheld shooting, though the Nikon may offer better stabilization in general shooting conditions.

Autofocus Performance

Both lenses boast advanced autofocus systems, but the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 is USM features Canon’s Nano USM technology, which ensures a high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus. This is particularly beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects like wildlife or sports. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm also supports a linear MF drive for smooth focusing, especially useful in video shooting. However, the reputation of Canon’s autofocus system may give the RF100-400mm a slight advantage in speed during still photography.

Weight and Portability

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 is USM is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry for extended periods. While the exact weight of the Canon lens isn’t available, it is described as similar in size to the EF 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 IS II USM, which is known for its portability. Conversely, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm weighs approximately 1.6 lbs (725 g), making it the lightest lens in its class. Therefore, while both are user-friendly, the Nikon lens may be slightly more convenient for travelers.

Minimum Focusing Distance

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm excels with a minimum focusing distance of just 0.2 meters at the maximum wide-angle position, allowing for unique close-up shots. This feature is particularly useful for dynamic expression in photography. In contrast, the Canon RF100-400mm has a minimum focusing distance of 2.89 feet at 200mm, which is less accommodating for close-up work. For photographers who prioritize macro or detailed shots, the Nikon lens clearly holds an advantage.

Target Audience

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 is USM is particularly well-suited for wildlife and sports photographers who need a lightweight, high-quality telephoto option. Its price point makes it an excellent choice for enthusiasts or semi-professionals. Conversely, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm is targeted towards those who want a versatile all-in-one lens for travel and everyday photography. The broader zoom range and focus capabilities make it particularly appealing for casual shooters who don’t want to carry multiple lenses.

Which should you buy?

The decision between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 is USM and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR ultimately comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for a high-quality telephoto lens at a more reasonable price, the Canon lens is about 46% cheaper and provides excellent performance in wildlife and sports photography. However, if you value versatility and a broader zoom range, the Nikon lens offers unique features like a closer minimum focusing distance and lighter weight, making it ideal for travel and casual shooting. Consider your photography style and budget carefully to make the best choice for your needs.