Canon RF100- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on stabilization and versatility, Nikon NIKKOR Z wins on weight and size.
The Canon RF100-400mm is a versatile telephoto lens ideal for wildlife and sports, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is a budget-friendly prime lens perfect for street photography.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Zoom Range
100-400mm vs 40mm
Image Stabilization
Up to 6 stops vs none
Autofocus Speed
High-speed Nano USM vs fast but less versatile
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better
Price
$276.95 vs $699.00
Portability
Compact prime vs larger zoom
Bokeh Quality
f/2 aperture vs f/5.6-8
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100- | Nikon NIKKOR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 100-400mm | 40mm |
| Max Aperture | f/5.6-8 | f/2 |
| Autofocus | Nano USM | Fast & quiet |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Price | $699.00 | $276.95 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is a versatile telephoto lens priced at $699.00, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 offers a prime lens experience at a significantly lower price of $276.95, making it about 60% cheaper. Each lens serves distinct photography needs, with Canon catering to wildlife and sports photographers and Nikon appealing to those seeking street and portrait photography.
Design and Build Quality
The design of the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM emphasizes compactness and lightweight construction, making it ideal for outdoor use. It features a control ring for quick adjustments and a minimum focusing distance of 2.89 feet at 200mm. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is also compact but focuses on a prime lens design that enhances portability, making it suitable for everyday use. Both lenses are designed for mirrorless systems, but their intended applications differ significantly.
Autofocus Performance
Autofocus performance is a strong point for both lenses, yet they cater to different shooting styles. The Canon RF100-400mm boasts high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus thanks to Canon’s Nano USM technology. This feature is particularly beneficial in dynamic environments like wildlife photography. Meanwhile, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 excels with fast and near-silent autofocus, which is crucial for street photography and video work, where focus breathing can disrupt framing.
Image Stabilization
Image stabilization is another area where the Canon RF100-400mm shines, offering Optical Image Stabilizer capabilities with up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, and even 6 stops when paired with certain EOS R series cameras. This feature is essential for capturing sharp images at longer focal lengths. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 does not explicitly mention image stabilization, which may limit its performance in low-light situations compared to the Canon lens.
Optical Quality
Optical quality is a highlight of both lenses, but they achieve it in different ways. The Canon RF100-400mm incorporates a single Ultra Low Dispersion lens element to reduce chromatic aberration throughout its zoom range, resulting in crisp and colorful images. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 features a fast f/2 maximum aperture that provides beautiful background blur and subject isolation, ideal for portraiture. Thus, while the Canon lens offers versatility in focal length, the Nikon provides superior depth of field control for creative shots.
Use Cases and Versatility
The Canon RF100-400mm is designed for a range of applications including wildlife, sports, and travel photography, thanks to its extensive zoom range of 100-400mm. It can also be paired with RF tele extenders for even greater focal length flexibility. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is a great all-rounder for street photography, landscapes, and candid portraits. Its 40mm focal length provides a natural perspective, which is especially useful for various shooting scenarios but lacks the extended reach of the Canon lens.
Pricing and Value for Money
When comparing pricing, the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM retails for $699.00, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is available for $276.95. This price difference of approximately $422.05 makes the Nikon lens about 60% cheaper. For photographers on a budget or those entering the mirrorless system, the Nikon lens offers excellent value without sacrificing quality. Meanwhile, the Canon lens justifies its higher price with advanced features tailored for more demanding photographic needs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 ultimately depends on your photography style and needs. If you are looking for a versatile telephoto lens with excellent stabilization for wildlife or sports photography, the Canon is the clear choice. However, if you prefer a compact, budget-friendly option for street photography and portraits, the Nikon lens is a fantastic pick. Each lens has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of photographers.

