vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Sigma

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on versatility and stability, Sigma wins on weight and size.

The Canon RF100-400mm offers versatility and superior zoom capabilities, while the Sigma 16mm excels in low-light performance and portability. Choose based on your photography needs.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Zoom Range

Canon offers a versatile 100-400mm zoom.

Image Stabilization

Canon provides up to 6 stops of shake correction.

Autofocus Speed

Canon features fast Nano USM autofocus.

Why Sigma is better

Price

Sigma is $160 cheaper.

Low-Light Performance

Sigma has a large f/1.4 aperture.

Portability

Sigma is compact and lightweight.

Overall score

Canon RF100-
85
Sigma
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Sigma
Aperturef/5.6-8f/1.4
Focal Length100-400mm16mm
Image StabilizationYesNo
AutofocusNano USMStepping Motor
Weather SealingNoYes

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Sigma

Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is designed for wildlife, sports, and travel photography, offering a versatile zoom range that reaches up to 400mm. This lens is priced at $699.00, which positions it as a premium option in the telephoto category. Its compact and lightweight design makes it an appealing choice for photographers who need to carry their gear over longer distances. The lens features an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, enhancing image clarity, especially at longer focal lengths. Additionally, it boasts fast and quiet autofocus, making it suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects.

Overview of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens

The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens is a prime lens tailored for Sony E mount cameras, priced at $539.00, making it about 17% cheaper than the Canon option. With its large f/1.4 aperture, this lens excels in low-light conditions, allowing for stunning images even in dim environments. Its compact size enhances portability, making it an excellent choice for nature and event photography. The lens also features a dust- and splash-proof design, ensuring reliability during outdoor shoots. Furthermore, it is optimized for fast Hybrid AF, providing smooth autofocus, particularly beneficial for video shooting.

Image Quality Comparison

In terms of image quality, the Canon RF100-400mm incorporates a single Ultra Low Dispersion lens element that minimizes chromatic aberration, ensuring sharp and vibrant images across the zoom range. This lens allows photographers to achieve a maximum magnification of 0.41x at 400mm, which is significant for close-up wildlife shots. On the other hand, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its larger aperture, delivers exceptional clarity and detail, particularly in low-light scenarios. The large aperture also offers a shallow depth of field, which is ideal for isolating subjects in event photography. Both lenses provide high image quality, but their strengths cater to different shooting scenarios.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus performance is a critical aspect for both lenses. The Canon RF100-400mm features Canon's Nano USM technology, providing fast, smooth, and quiet autofocus, which is crucial for capturing fleeting moments in wildlife and sports photography. This lens is particularly effective when paired with EOS R series cameras, achieving up to 6 stops of shake correction. In contrast, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is designed with a stepping motor that accommodates Fast Hybrid AF, making it responsive during video shooting and excellent for capturing sharp images quickly. While both lenses excel in autofocus, the choice may depend on the specific needs of the photographer, such as whether they prioritize silent operation or speed.

Versatility and Use Cases

The versatility of the Canon RF100-400mm is highlighted by its extensive zoom range, making it suitable for various photography styles, from wildlife to sports and travel. The ability to attach RF1.4x and RF2x tele extenders further enhances its focal length, reaching up to 800mm, which is beneficial for distant subjects. In contrast, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is a prime lens that, while not offering zoom capabilities, excels in specific scenarios such as landscape and event photography. Its compact design makes it ideal for travel, while the wide aperture allows for creative control over depth of field. Thus, the Canon lens offers broader versatility, while the Sigma lens shines in specialized situations.

Build Quality and Portability

When it comes to build quality, the Canon RF100-400mm is designed to be compact and lightweight, enhancing its portability. This makes it easier for photographers to carry during long shoots. Conversely, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 also has a compact profile but is notable for its dust- and splash-proof design, which is particularly beneficial for outdoor photography. While both lenses prioritize portability, the Sigma's weather-sealing provides an added layer of durability for photographers working in challenging conditions. Therefore, if ruggedness is a crucial factor, the Sigma may have an edge.

Price and Value for Money

The Canon RF100-400mm is priced at $699.00, while the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is offered at $539.00. This price difference of about $160 reflects the differing functionalities and target users of each lens. The Canon lens targets photographers needing a versatile telephoto option, while the Sigma lens appeals to those seeking a high-quality wide-angle prime at a more accessible price point. Depending on your specific needs, the Sigma lens offers better value for those focused on low-light performance and portability without the need for a zoom feature.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens ultimately depends on your photography style and requirements. If you primarily shoot wildlife or sports and need a versatile zoom lens with impressive image stabilization, the Canon RF100-400mm is an excellent choice despite its higher price. However, if your focus is on event or landscape photography in low-light conditions, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its larger aperture and lower price, may provide better value and functionality. Each lens has its strengths, catering to different types of photographers and shooting scenarios.