vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Sigma 18-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on stabilization and zoom range, Sigma 18- wins on price and weight.

The Canon RF100-400mm excels in telephoto capabilities and advanced features, while the Sigma 18-50mm offers versatility at a lower price.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Zoom Range

Canon offers a 100-400mm range for distant subjects.

Image Stabilization

Canon provides up to 6 stops of stabilization.

Autofocus

Canon features fast Nano USM autofocus technology.

Why Sigma 18- is better

Price

Sigma is approximately 17% cheaper.

Portability

Sigma is more compact and lightweight.

Versatility

Sigma covers a range of photography styles.

Overall score

Canon RF100-
85
Sigma 18-
70

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Sigma 18-
Focal Length100-400mm18-50mm
Max ApertureF5.6-8F2.8
Weight1.5 lbs0.9 lbs
Image StabilizationYesNo
Autofocus TypeNano USMNot specified

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Sigma 18-

Overview

When comparing the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN Contemporary, the most significant difference lies in their intended use and focal range. The Canon lens, priced at $699.00, is designed for telephoto photography, making it ideal for capturing distant subjects. In contrast, the Sigma lens, available for $587.00, offers a versatile wide-angle to mid-range zoom, focusing on everyday photography needs.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon RF100-400mm provides a remarkable zoom range of 100-400mm, making it suitable for wildlife, sports, and travel photography. This extensive reach allows photographers to capture subjects from a distance without needing to get physically close. On the other hand, the Sigma 18-50mm boasts a more modest focal length range, making it an excellent choice for landscape, portrait, and street photography. The versatility of the Sigma lens is evident in its ability to handle various shooting scenarios, but it cannot match the Canon's telephoto capabilities.

Image Stabilization

A standout feature of the Canon RF100-400mm is its Optical Image Stabilizer, which offers up to 5.5 stops of shake correction. This feature is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in challenging lighting conditions or at long focal lengths. When paired with EOS R series cameras featuring In-Body Image Stabilizer (IBIS), the stabilization can increase to 6 stops. The Sigma lens does not specify a similar stabilization feature, which may affect image sharpness during handheld use, especially in low-light situations or at slower shutter speeds.

Autofocus Performance

The Canon RF100-400mm excels in autofocus performance with its fast, smooth, and quiet Nano USM technology. This feature is crucial for capturing fast-moving subjects, such as athletes or wildlife, ensuring that the focus remains sharp even as the subject moves. In comparison, while the Sigma 18-50mm is noted for its superb optical quality, there is no mention of its autofocus system's specifics. This lack of detail makes it challenging to assess how it stacks up against the Canon in dynamic shooting situations.

Build and Portability

The Sigma 18-50mm is notably compact and lightweight, designed for ease of use and portability. Weighing less than the Canon RF100-400mm, it is well-suited for photographers who prioritize a lightweight kit for travel or everyday use. The Canon lens, while still relatively compact for a telephoto, will be bulkier, particularly when extended to its maximum focal length. This difference in size and weight can significantly influence a photographer's choice, especially those who frequently shoot on the go.

Price Comparison

The Canon RF100-400mm is priced at $699.00, compared to Sigma's $587.00. This makes the Sigma lens approximately 17% cheaper than the Canon. For photographers on a budget or those seeking a versatile lens for general use, the Sigma presents a compelling option without sacrificing too much in optical performance. However, for those specifically interested in telephoto photography, the investment in the Canon lens may justify the higher price.

Target Audience

The target audience for the Canon RF100-400mm primarily includes wildlife and sports photographers who require a lens with substantial zoom capabilities. Its advanced features, such as image stabilization and fast autofocus, cater to those who need reliability in challenging conditions. Conversely, the Sigma 18-50mm appeals to a broader range of photographers, including hobbyists and those engaged in portrait or street photography. Its versatility makes it suitable for various genres, though it may lack the specialized features that dedicated telephoto users seek.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF100-400mm and the Sigma 18-50mm boils down to your specific photography needs. If you require a telephoto lens with superior zoom capabilities and advanced stabilization, the Canon RF100-400mm is the better choice despite its higher price. However, if you prefer a more versatile and budget-friendly option for everyday photography, the Sigma 18-50mm would serve you well. Your decision should align with your photographic style and the types of subjects you intend to capture.