Canon RF100- vs Sony E
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on stabilization and focus speed, Sony E wins on weight and aperture.
The Canon RF100-400mm excels in versatility and stabilization, while the Sony E 11mm offers superior low-light performance and compactness.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Zoom Range
Canon offers a versatile 100-400mm zoom.
Image Stabilization
Canon provides up to 6 stops of stabilization.
Autofocus Speed
Canon features high-speed Nano USM autofocus.
Why Sony E is better
Low-Light
Sony has a larger F1.8 aperture.
Compactness
Sony is lighter and more portable.
Video Use
Sony's design is optimized for vlogging.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100- | Sony E |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | F5.6-8 | F1.8 |
| Focal Length | 100-400mm | 11mm |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus | Nano USM | Linear Motors |
| Weight | 1.5 lbs | 0.5 lbs |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is currently available for $699.00, while the Sony E 11mm F1.8 APS-C Ultra-Wide-Angle Prime is slightly cheaper at $698.00. This means that the Sony lens is about 0.14% less expensive than the Canon lens. While the price difference is minimal, it may still influence budget-conscious consumers looking for the best deal. Both lenses offer excellent value for their respective categories, but the marginal difference in price could make the Sony lens a more appealing option for those on a tighter budget.
Purpose and Use Cases
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is designed primarily for wildlife and sports photography, thanks to its versatile zoom range of 100-400mm. This makes it particularly effective for capturing distant subjects with high image quality. In contrast, the Sony E 11mm F1.8 APS-C Ultra-Wide-Angle Prime is ideal for capturing dynamic perspectives and sweeping landscapes, making it a favorite among vloggers and content creators. While the Canon excels in long-range shooting, the Sony's ultra-wide perspective is perfect for close-up shots and video work, showcasing the unique strengths of each lens depending on the intended use.
Build and Design
Both lenses are designed with portability in mind. The Canon RF100-400mm is compact and lightweight for a telephoto lens, making it easier to carry during long photography sessions. It also features a control ring for quick setting adjustments, enhancing usability. The Sony E 11mm, on the other hand, is incredibly compact and lightweight, designed specifically for APS-C and Super35 E-mount cameras. Its refined internal focus mechanism ensures that the lens length remains constant while focusing, which contributes to better balance and handling. Each lens excels in its design, catering to the distinct demands of their respective photography styles.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus performance of both lenses is a strong selling point. The Canon RF100-400mm features Canon’s Nano USM technology, offering high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus, which is beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects. In comparison, the Sony E 11mm employs two linear motors to deliver fast and precise autofocus, making it ideal for both stills and video. This responsiveness allows photographers to capture even erratically moving subjects effectively. While both lenses boast impressive autofocus systems, the choice between them might depend on whether you prioritize speed in a telephoto context or versatility in an ultra-wide-angle setting.
Image Stabilization
The Canon RF100-400mm offers Optical Image Stabilization with up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, increasing to 6 stops when paired with EOS R series cameras featuring In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS). This is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting, allowing for sharper images in low light or at longer focal lengths. Conversely, the Sony E 11mm does not explicitly mention image stabilization features, focusing instead on its fast autofocus and lightweight build. For users who prioritize stabilization, especially in telephoto scenarios, the Canon lens presents a clear advantage, while those favoring ultrawide shots might find stabilization less critical.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Canon RF100-400mm has a maximum aperture of F5.6-8, which is adequate for general use but may struggle in low-light conditions compared to other lenses. The Sony E 11mm, with its larger F1.8 aperture, excels in low-light situations, allowing for better performance in dimly lit environments and creating beautiful bokeh. This feature makes the Sony lens particularly appealing for videographers and photographers who often work in challenging lighting. If low-light capability is a primary concern, the Sony lens offers significant advantages over the Canon.
Image Quality
Both lenses are designed to deliver high image quality, but they target different aspects of photography. The Canon RF100-400mm incorporates a single Ultra Low Dispersion lens element to correct chromatic aberration, ensuring crisp and colorful images throughout its zoom range. The Sony E 11mm promises corner-to-corner sharpness and naturally rendered bokeh, appealing to those who value dynamic compositions and detailed backgrounds. Depending on the type of photography—telephoto versus ultra-wide—each lens provides unique capabilities in image quality, making them suited for their respective applications.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Sony E 11mm F1.8 APS-C Ultra-Wide-Angle Prime ultimately comes down to your specific photography needs. If you prioritize versatility in zoom range and superior image stabilization, the Canon RF100-400mm is a compelling option, especially for wildlife and sports photography. However, if you are looking for a lightweight, compact lens with exceptional low-light performance and a wide field of view for vlogging or landscape photography, the Sony E 11mm is the better choice. Both lenses offer great value, but their unique strengths cater to different photographic styles and preferences.

