vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Tamron 150-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on stabilization, Tamron 150- wins on price and zoom.

The Canon RF100-400mm offers excellent value and portability, while the Tamron 150-500mm provides superior reach and build quality.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Price

Canon is $500 cheaper

Weight

Canon is more lightweight

Compatibility

Canon supports RF extenders

Why Tamron 150- is better

Zoom Range

Tamron extends to 500mm

Build Quality

Tamron has moisture-resistant construction

Image Quality

Tamron offers superior edge-to-edge clarity

Overall score

Canon RF100-
78
Tamron 150-
85

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Tamron 150-
BrandCanonTamron
Max ApertureF5.6-8F5-6.7
AutofocusNano USMVXD
Image StabilizationYesYes
CompatibilityRF MountNikon Z

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Tamron 150-

Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 is USM

The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 is USM is a compact and lightweight telephoto lens designed for EOS R series cameras. Priced at $699.00, it offers excellent versatility with a zoom range of 100-400mm, making it ideal for wildlife, sports, and travel photography. The lens features an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, enhancing its usability in various shooting conditions. Additionally, the lens can achieve a maximum magnification of 0.41x at 400mm, allowing photographers to capture detailed images from a distance.

Overview of the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

The Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD is designed for Nikon Z mount mirrorless cameras and is priced at $1,199.00. This lens offers a broader zoom range, extending to 500mm, which is particularly beneficial for capturing distant subjects. Its compact size, measuring just 8.4 inches and extending to 11.3 inches when zoomed, makes it a portable option for photographers on the go. With advanced features like BBAR-G2 coating for enhanced clarity and moisture-resistant construction, this lens stands out for its exceptional image quality and durability.

Image Stabilization Capabilities

Both lenses offer impressive image stabilization features, but they cater to different user needs. The Canon RF100-400mm provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, which can increase to 6 stops when paired with EOS R series cameras that feature In-Body Image Stabilization. This makes it highly effective for handheld shooting in challenging conditions. On the other hand, the Tamron 150-500mm is equipped with its proprietary VC image stabilization mechanism, which ensures stability across its entire zoom range. While both lenses aim to minimize blur caused by camera shake, the Canon lens has a slight edge in stabilization versatility when used with compatible bodies.

Autofocus Performance

The autofocus capabilities of the Canon RF100-400mm and the Tamron 150-500mm are noteworthy, yet differ in their execution. The Canon lens features Canon’s Nano USM technology, which delivers high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus. This is crucial for capturing fast-moving subjects, making it ideal for sports and wildlife photography. Conversely, the Tamron lens boasts the VXD autofocus mechanism, which is also designed for precision and speed. While both lenses promise efficient autofocus, the Canon's technology may offer a slight advantage in noise reduction during focus adjustments.

Versatility and Usability

When it comes to versatility, the Canon RF100-400mm excels due to its compact design and compatibility with RF tele extenders, allowing for an effective maximum focal length of up to 800mm. This flexibility can be particularly useful for photographers looking to expand their shooting options without carrying additional lenses. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm, while providing a longer reach of 500mm, is more limited in terms of extender compatibility. However, its ability to achieve an impressive minimum object distance of 23.6 inches allows for compelling close-up shots, adding to its usability in various scenarios.

Price and Value Considerations

The Canon RF100-400mm is priced at $699.00, which positions it as a more affordable option compared to the Tamron 150-500mm at $1,199.00. This results in a significant price difference of about 42%. For photographers on a budget or those who prioritize value without compromising on quality, the Canon lens offers an attractive package. However, the Tamron lens justifies its higher price with its extended zoom range and superior build quality, making it a worthwhile investment for serious photographers seeking versatility and performance.

Build Quality and Construction

The Tamron 150-500mm stands out with its moisture-resistant construction and fluorine coating, ensuring durability in various environmental conditions. This is particularly advantageous for outdoor photographers who may face challenging weather. The Canon RF100-400mm, while compact and lightweight, does not explicitly mention similar protective features. However, its design is optimized for ease of use and transport, making it a practical choice for travel. Ultimately, the choice between these lenses may depend on the photographer's specific needs regarding build quality and environmental resilience.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 is USM and the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD ultimately depends on your photography style and requirements. The Canon lens is about 42% cheaper, making it an excellent entry point for photographers looking for a lightweight, versatile telephoto option with impressive stabilization. On the other hand, the Tamron lens offers a longer reach and superior image quality, making it ideal for those willing to invest more for enhanced features. If portability and budget are your primary concerns, the Canon RF100-400mm is the way to go. However, for serious photographers who prioritize performance and versatility in their lens options, the Tamron 150-500mm is an outstanding choice.