Canon RF100- vs Tamron 18-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- leads on weight and zoom range.
The Canon RF100-400mm excels in telephoto capabilities, while the Tamron 18-300mm offers versatility at a lower price.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Telephoto Range
Superior zoom range of 100-400mm
Image Stabilization
Up to 6 stops of shake correction
Autofocus
Fast and quiet Nano USM technology
Why Tamron 18- is better
Price
More budget-friendly at $599.00
Versatility
16.6x zoom range for various photography styles
Close-Up
Better minimum object distance for macro shots
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100- | Tamron 18- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 100-400mm | 18-300mm |
| Max Aperture | F5.6-8 | F3.5-6.3 |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Minimum Focus | 2.89 ft | 5.9 in |
| Weight | 24.7 oz | 21.9 oz |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm and Tamron 18-300mm
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is priced at $699.00, while the Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 is more budget-friendly at $599.00, making it about 17% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different photographic needs, with the Canon focusing on telephoto capabilities and the Tamron offering an extensive zoom range suitable for various situations. Understanding their unique features can help you decide which lens aligns better with your photography style.
Zoom Range and Versatility
The Canon RF100-400mm offers a versatile zoom range of 100-400mm, which is particularly beneficial for wildlife and sports photography. This lens excels in bringing distant subjects closer, making it a top choice for capturing detailed shots from afar. In contrast, the Tamron 18-300mm covers a remarkable 18-300mm focal length, which translates to a 27mm to 450mm full-frame equivalent. This wide-ranging zoom enables it to handle everything from wide-angle landscapes to ultra-telephoto shots, making it a versatile all-in-one option for everyday photography.
Autofocus Performance
Autofocus performance is a critical aspect for both lenses. The Canon RF100-400mm features Canon's Nano USM technology, providing fast, smooth, and quiet autofocus, ideal for capturing action without disturbing the subject. Meanwhile, the Tamron 18-300mm incorporates a VXD linear motor focus mechanism, which is known for its quick and precise autofocus capabilities. This is especially important for both still and video shooting, making the Tamron a strong contender for versatile shooting scenarios.
Image Stabilization
The Canon RF100-400mm boasts an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, which increases to 6 stops when paired with EOS R series cameras featuring In-Body Image Stabilization. This feature is particularly valuable for handheld photography at longer focal lengths, ensuring clear images even in challenging conditions. On the other hand, the Tamron 18-300mm comes equipped with a proprietary VC (Vibration Compensation) mechanism that effectively reduces image blur caused by camera shake, making it adept for low-light conditions and ultra-telephoto shooting.
Build Quality and Design
In terms of build quality, the Canon RF100-400mm is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it easier to handle during extended shooting sessions. Its portability is a significant advantage for travel and wildlife photographers. Conversely, the Tamron 18-300mm also emphasizes a compact design at 4.9 x 2.9 inches and a weight of just 21.9 ounces. Additionally, it features moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, enhancing its durability against the elements, which is a critical consideration for outdoor photography.
Close-Up Capabilities
When it comes to close-up photography, the Canon RF100-400mm has a minimum focusing distance of 2.89 feet at 200mm, allowing for decent close-up shots. However, the Tamron 18-300mm excels with a remarkable minimum object distance (MOD) of 5.9 inches at 18mm, along with a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2. This capability makes the Tamron particularly appealing for macro photography, allowing photographers to capture intricate details in subjects that are much closer.
Price Comparison
With a price tag of $699.00 for the Canon RF100-400mm and $599.00 for the Tamron 18-300mm, the latter presents a more budget-friendly option. That’s a difference of $100, making the Tamron about 14% less expensive than the Canon. For photographers looking to maximize value without sacrificing versatility, the Tamron lens offers an attractive proposition, especially considering its extensive zoom range.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF100-400mm and the Tamron 18-300mm ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you require a lens that specializes in telephoto capabilities, particularly for wildlife or sports, the Canon RF100-400mm is a strong contender with its impressive zoom range and advanced image stabilization features. However, if you seek a versatile all-in-one lens that can handle a range of photography styles—from wide landscapes to macro shots—the Tamron 18-300mm is a more economical choice with its extensive focal range and effective autofocus system. Consider what you'll be photographing most often to make the best decision for your needs.

