Canon RF100- vs Tamron 70-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on price and max focal, Tamron 70- wins on min focusing.
The Canon RF100-400mm offers superior reach and advanced features, while the Tamron 70-300mm is a budget-friendly option with good performance. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Zoom Range
Canon offers a 100-400mm range compared to Tamron's 70-300mm.
Image Stabilization
Canon provides up to 6 stops of stabilization.
Autofocus Speed
Canon's Nano USM technology ensures faster focusing.
Why Tamron 70- is better
Price
Tamron is $300 cheaper than Canon.
Weight
Tamron is lighter at 19.2 oz compared to Canon.
Portability
Tamron's compact design makes it easier to carry.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100- | Tamron 70- |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus | Nano USM | RXD |
| Image Quality | Ultra Low Dispersion | 15 elements |
| Max Magnification | 0.41x | 1:5.1 |
| Weather Resistance | No | Yes |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is a compact and lightweight telephoto lens priced at $699.00. It offers a versatile zoom range of 100-400mm, making it a great option for wildlife, sports, and travel photography. The lens features an Optical Image Stabilizer that provides up to 5.5 stops of shake correction, which can be enhanced to 6 stops when paired with certain EOS R series cameras that include In-Body Image Stabilization.
This lens is designed for Canon's EOS R series cameras, providing impressive image quality and quick autofocus through Canon’s Nano USM technology. With a minimum focusing distance of 2.89 feet at 200mm and a maximum magnification of 0.41x at 400mm, photographers can capture detailed images even from a distance. Additionally, it can accommodate RF tele extenders for increased focal lengths, enhancing its versatility.
Overview of the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD
The Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD is a budget-friendly telephoto lens retailing for $399.00, making it about 43% cheaper than the Canon RF100-400mm. This lens is designed for Sony full-frame E-mount mirrorless cameras and is recognized for its lightweight and portable design. Weighing just 19.2 oz and measuring 5.8 inches in length, it is among the smallest and lightest lenses in its category.
The lens boasts 15 elements in 10 groups, providing uncompromising image quality while enabling users to shoot up close with a focusing distance of 31.5 inches at wide angles and 59.1 inches at telephoto settings. Its moisture-resistant construction adds durability, making it suitable for various shooting conditions. The lens also features a high-speed AF drive system called RXD, which allows for quiet operation, vital for capturing candid moments without disturbing subjects.
Image Quality Comparison
Image quality is crucial for any photographer, and both lenses deliver impressive results in their own right. The Canon RF100-400mm is designed with a single Ultra Low Dispersion lens element that corrects chromatic aberration throughout its zoom range, ensuring crisp and colorful images. This attention to detail grants photographers a maximum magnification of 0.41x at 400mm, making it a strong choice for detailed wildlife shots.
On the other hand, the Tamron 70-300mm also focuses on image quality, using special lens elements to minimize chromatic aberration and other optical distortions. While it doesn't reach the same maximum focal length as the Canon, it still provides a versatile range of 70-300mm, which is effective for a range of subjects including landscapes and portraits. Both lenses are well-regarded for their image quality, but the Canon's longer reach gives it an edge for distant subjects.
Autofocus Performance
Autofocus performance can significantly impact the shooting experience, and both lenses excel in this area. The Canon RF100-400mm uses Canon's Nano USM technology, which is designed for high-speed, smooth, and quiet focusing. This feature is particularly beneficial for wildlife and sports photography, where quick focusing can make the difference between capturing the perfect shot or missing it entirely.
Conversely, the Tamron 70-300mm includes the Rapid eXtra-silent stepping Drive (RXD) unit, which offers a high-speed and remarkably quiet autofocus experience. This is particularly advantageous for those shooting in environments where silence is necessary, such as during events or while photographing wildlife. While both lenses provide efficient autofocus, the choice may depend on the specific shooting conditions and requirements of the photographer.
Versatility and Zoom Range
In terms of versatility, the Canon RF100-400mm stands out with its broader zoom range and compatibility with RF tele extenders. The ability to extend its focal length to 560mm or even 800mm with the extenders makes it an exceptional choice for photographers looking to capture distant subjects with clarity. This flexibility is particularly useful for wildlife enthusiasts or sports photographers needing to zoom in on the action.
The Tamron 70-300mm, while limited to a 300mm maximum focal length, still offers a significant range for various types of photography, including landscapes and portraits. Its compact size makes it easy to handle for handheld shooting, which is perfect for spontaneous photography sessions. However, for those specifically seeking extreme telephoto capabilities, the Canon lens provides superior options.
Build Quality and Design
Both lenses exhibit solid build quality, but their designs cater to different user preferences. The Canon RF100-400mm is lauded for its compactness and lightweight nature, making it a comfortable option for extended shooting sessions. The lens also incorporates a control ring for quick adjustments to settings like shutter speed and aperture, enhancing user convenience.
On the other hand, the Tamron 70-300mm emphasizes portability without compromising on durability, featuring a moisture-resistant construction that allows for outdoor shooting in various weather conditions. Its lightweight design makes it an attractive option for photographers who prioritize mobility. Ultimately, both lenses offer thoughtful designs, but the choice may depend on which features align better with the photographer's style and needs.
Price Comparison
Pricing is a significant differentiating factor between the two lenses. The Canon RF100-400mm is priced at $699.00, while the Tamron 70-300mm is considerably more affordable at $399.00. This represents a price difference of about $300, making the Tamron lens approximately 43% less expensive than the Canon option.
For photographers on a budget or those just starting, the Tamron lens presents a compelling value without sacrificing essential features. However, for professionals or serious enthusiasts who require the advanced capabilities offered by the Canon, the investment may be justified.
Which should you buy?
When deciding between the Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM and the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD, it ultimately comes down to your specific needs as a photographer. If you require a versatile telephoto lens with superior reach and advanced image stabilization, the Canon lens is the better choice despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a lightweight, budget-friendly option that still delivers excellent image quality for a variety of subjects, the Tamron lens is an outstanding option. Both lenses have their merits, making them suitable for different photographic scenarios and preferences.

