Canon RF100- vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- leads on price and weight.
The Canon RF100-400mm excels in versatility and zoom capabilities, while the VILTROX 35mm offers excellent value for portrait photography. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Zoom Range
Canon offers a versatile 100-400mm zoom.
Image Stabilization
Canon provides up to 6 stops of shake correction.
Compatibility
Canon works with RF tele extenders for greater focal lengths.
Why VILTROX is better
Price
VILTROX is significantly cheaper at $179.
Weight
VILTROX is lighter at 170 grams.
Bokeh
VILTROX's F1.7 aperture creates beautiful bokeh.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100- | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | VILTROX |
| Type | Telephoto | Prime |
| Autofocus | Nano USM | STM |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Max Magnification | 0.41x | N/A |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF100-400mm and VILTROX 35mm
The Canon RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM is a versatile telephoto lens priced at $699.00, while the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 E-Mount is a prime lens available for $179.00, making it about 74% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different photographic needs, with the Canon lens aimed at wildlife and sports photography and the VILTROX lens suited for portraits and general photography. Understanding their unique features will help buyers choose the right lens for their shooting style.
Design and Build Quality
Both the Canon RF100-400mm and VILTROX 35mm exhibit excellent design elements. The Canon lens is compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry for extended periods, especially given its impressive zoom range of 100-400mm. This design is particularly beneficial for wildlife and sports photographers who require mobility without sacrificing image quality. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm is also lightweight at just 170 grams, which enhances its portability for casual and on-the-go shooting. This compactness is ideal for street photography where quick maneuverability is a must.
Optical Performance
When it comes to optical performance, the Canon RF100-400mm features a single Ultra Low Dispersion lens element that effectively corrects chromatic aberration across its zoom range, delivering crisp and colorful images. It also boasts an Optical Image Stabilizer, offering up to 5.5 stops of shake correction. Comparatively, the VILTROX 35mm employs an optical structure of 11 elements in 9 groups, including an ED lens and an aspherical lens, designed to provide a sharp focus and a beautiful bokeh effect thanks to its F1.7 aperture. The differences in optical engineering cater to different use cases, with the Canon excelling in zoom versatility and the VILTROX shining in low-light and portrait settings.
Autofocus Capabilities
Autofocus performance is another critical aspect in which these lenses differ significantly. The Canon RF100-400mm utilizes Canon's Nano USM technology, offering high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus, which is particularly advantageous for fast-moving subjects. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm features a built-in STM stepping motor that efficiently supports eye and face autofocus, providing precise tracking and lower latency. This makes the VILTROX an excellent choice for portrait photography where focus precision is crucial. Both lenses provide reliable autofocus, but their effectiveness varies based on the shooting circumstances.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two lenses is substantial, with the Canon RF100-400mm retailing at $699.00 and the VILTROX 35mm at $179.00. This places the VILTROX at about 74% less than the Canon, making it a much more budget-friendly option. However, potential buyers should consider what they will be using the lens for, as the higher price of the Canon lens reflects its greater versatility and advanced features suited for specific types of photography.
Intended Use Cases
The Canon RF100-400mm is specifically designed for photographers capturing wildlife, sports, and distant subjects, providing a long-reaching focal length that brings the action closer. Its zoom capability and image stabilization features make it an indispensable tool for outdoor photography. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm is better suited for portrait, street, and general photography, where its large aperture allows for creativity in depth of field and low-light situations. The choice between these lenses ultimately hinges on the photographer's specific needs and shooting style.
Compatibility and Versatility
The Canon RF100-400mm is compatible with EOS R series cameras and can work with RF tele extenders, allowing photographers to expand their focal lengths to 560mm or even 800mm. This enhances its versatility significantly, making it suitable for varied shooting scenarios. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 35mm is designed for Sony E-mount cameras, such as the A7 series and FX3, and provides a micro USB interface for firmware upgrades, ensuring its longevity and adaptability to future technologies. While both lenses offer compatibility features, the Canon's ability to extend its focal range is a significant advantage for users.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF100-400mm and VILTROX 35mm ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. If you're focused on wildlife or sports photography and require a versatile lens that provides significant zoom capability without compromising on image quality, the Canon RF100-400mm is the clear choice, albeit at a higher price point. Conversely, if you're looking for a lightweight, budget-friendly lens for portraiture or street photography, the VILTROX 35mm offers excellent optical performance at a fraction of the cost. Understanding your shooting style will guide you in making the best decision.

