Canon RF100- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- wins on focal length and stabilization, Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- wins on price and versatility.
The Canon RF100-500mm excels in super-telephoto capabilities and image stabilization, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm offers versatility and faster autofocus. Choose based on your specific photography needs.
Why Canon RF100- is better
Focal Length
Canon offers a super-telephoto range of 100mm to 500mm.
Image Stabilization
Canon provides up to 5 stops of shake correction.
Build Quality
Canon features extensive weather sealing for durability.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- is better
Price
Nikon is approximately $102 cheaper.
Autofocus Speed
Nikon's autofocus is 5x faster than its predecessor.
Versatility
Nikon covers a standard zoom range suitable for various scenarios.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100- | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | F4.5-7.1 | F2.8 |
| Weight | 3.1 lbs | 1.75 lbs |
| Close Focus | 3.0 ft | 9.5 in |
| Image Stabilization | 5 stops | N/A |
| Zoom Type | External | Internal |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM Lens
The Canon RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM Lens is a versatile super-telephoto zoom lens priced at $2,898.95. It excels in capturing sports, wildlife, and aviation photography, thanks to its impressive focal length range of 100mm to 500mm. This lens is designed specifically for Canon EOS R series mirrorless cameras and boasts high-performance features, including optical image stabilization and fast autofocus.
The lens's optical image stabilization system allows for up to 5 stops of shake correction, which is crucial for handheld shooting at longer focal lengths. Its robust construction, including weather resistance, ensures reliability in challenging shooting conditions. The RF100-500mm is an excellent choice for photographers looking for a high-quality, travel-ready super-telephoto lens.
Overview of the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II is a professional-grade zoom lens retailing for $2,796.95, making it about 3.5% cheaper than the Canon option. This lens features a constant f/2.8 aperture and is notable for being the world's first internal zoom lens in its category. It is designed for Nikon's Z series cameras and offers a versatile focal length range that is ideal for a variety of shooting scenarios, from landscapes to portraits.
One of its standout features is its faster and quieter autofocus, which is five times quicker and 50% quieter than its predecessor. This makes it particularly suitable for video recording, where silence is key. The lens also ensures smooth focus transitions, making it a strong contender for videographers and photographers alike.
Image Stabilization Capabilities
When it comes to image stabilization, the Canon RF100-500mm offers superior features with its built-in optical image stabilization providing up to 5 stops of shake correction. This is particularly beneficial for photographers who often shoot at longer focal lengths where camera shake can be more pronounced. Additionally, the lens includes three image stabilization modes, allowing greater creative versatility depending on the shooting scenario.
In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm focuses on enhancing the experience for videographers with its internal zoom mechanism, which increases stability and resists dust and moisture. While it does not specify a shake correction feature like Canon’s, the internal zoom helps maintain balance, especially when used with gimbals. Both lenses are designed to support steady shooting, but the Canon lens takes the lead in traditional image stabilization performance.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus capabilities of both lenses are impressive, but they serve different purposes. The Canon RF100-500mm features Dual Nano USM technology, ensuring high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus, essential for capturing fast-moving subjects such as wildlife or sports. Its autofocus system is designed to deliver reliable performance in various lighting conditions.
On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II boasts an autofocus system that is five times faster and 50% quieter than previous models, reducing operational noise significantly. This makes it particularly advantageous for videographers who need to maintain audio quality. While the Canon lens is tailored for speed and accuracy in dynamic situations, the Nikon lens excels in providing a seamless experience for both photography and videography.
Build Quality and Durability
Both lenses are constructed with high-quality materials, but the Canon RF100-500mm emphasizes durability with its L-series build, which includes weather-resistant features to protect against dust and moisture. This makes it a reliable option for outdoor photography in challenging conditions.
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm also presents a robust design with its internal zoom mechanism, enhancing stability and dust resistance. While both lenses are built to last, the Canon lens may be better suited for extreme conditions due to its extensive weather sealing. Photographers who often shoot in variable environments may find Canon’s offering more aligned with their needs.
Versatility in Focal Lengths
The Canon RF100-500mm lens offers a significant advantage in terms of focal length versatility, providing a super-telephoto range that is ideal for capturing distant subjects. This makes it particularly appealing for wildlife and sport photographers who require the ability to photograph from afar.
In comparison, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II covers a more standard zoom range, which is versatile for general photography, landscapes, and portraits. While the Nikon lens is suitable for a wide range of scenarios, it lacks the extreme reach of the Canon lens. Thus, the choice between the two will largely depend on the specific photographic needs and preferred shooting styles of the user.
Pricing and Value Proposition
The Canon RF100-500mm is priced at $2,898.95, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm comes in at a lower price of $2,796.95, making it approximately $102 cheaper. This price difference may influence buyers who are looking for quality without stretching their budget too far.
Both lenses offer excellent value for their respective categories, but the decision may boil down to whether you require the extensive reach of the Canon or the versatility of the Nikon. For those primarily focused on sports, wildlife, or distant landscapes, the Canon lens provides unmatched capabilities. Conversely, the Nikon lens is an excellent choice for everyday photography and video work.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Canon RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM Lens and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you are looking for a high-performance super-telephoto lens with superior image stabilization and autofocus for wildlife or sports photography, the Canon RF100-500mm is the ideal choice. However, if you need a versatile, high-quality lens for a variety of shooting situations, especially for video work, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II offers excellent performance at a slightly lower price.

