vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Sigma 28-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- leads on price and focal length.

The Canon RF100-500mm excels in telephoto capabilities and advanced features, while the Sigma 28-70mm offers versatility and affordability for everyday use.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Telephoto Range

Superior focal length of 100mm to 500mm

Image Stabilization

Up to 5 stops of shake correction

Autofocus

High-speed Dual Nano USM technology

Why Sigma 28- is better

Price

More affordable at $859.95

Weight

Lightweight and compact design

Versatility

Ideal for everyday photography

Overall score

Canon RF100-
88
Sigma 28-
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Sigma 28-
Max ApertureF4.5-7.1F2.8
Minimum Focus3.0 ft0.5 ft
Image StabilizationYesNo
Lens TypeSuper-TelephotoStandard Zoom
CompatibilityCanon EOS RSony E

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Sigma 28-

Overview

The Canon RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L is USM Lens and the Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN for Sony E offer distinct benefits for different types of photographers. The Canon lens, priced at $2,898.95, is a super-telephoto zoom lens designed for wildlife and sports photography, while the Sigma lens, at $859.95, is a standard zoom lens ideal for everyday use. Understanding these key differences will help you determine which lens best suits your needs.

Design and Build Quality

The Canon RF100-500mm is notable for its durable L-series construction, designed to withstand challenging environments with features like dust and weather resistance. This lens includes a compact, travel-ready design, making it suitable for outdoor photography. In contrast, the Sigma 28-70mm emphasizes portability with its lightweight and compact body. It also boasts superb build quality, ensuring reliability during everyday shooting. While both lenses are designed to last, the Canon lens is more robust, making it better suited for extreme conditions.

Optical Performance

When it comes to optical performance, the Canon RF100-500mm shines with its brilliant resolving power and advanced optical image stabilization, offering up to 5 stops of shake correction. This is particularly beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects in low-light situations. The Sigma 28-70mm also delivers impressive image quality, rivaling higher-end lenses, thanks to its optical design based on the acclaimed 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN | Art lens. Both lenses excel in their respective ranges, but the Canon lens has the edge for long-distance photography with its super-telephoto capabilities.

Autofocus Capabilities

The Canon RF100-500mm features high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus powered by Dual Nano USM technology, making it especially effective for capturing dynamic subjects. This results in a seamless shooting experience, particularly in wildlife or sports photography. The Sigma 28-70mm, while equipped with a focus mode switch, does not specifically highlight advanced autofocus technology. However, it is designed for consistent performance, making it suitable for general photography. The Canon lens is better for situations requiring rapid focus adjustments.

Versatility and Use Cases

The Canon RF100-500mm is incredibly versatile, with a focal length range of 100mm to 500mm, making it ideal for various applications, including sports, wildlife, and aviation photography. Its minimum focusing distance of 3.0 ft. allows for some close-up shots as well. In contrast, the Sigma 28-70mm is tailored for everyday use, providing a practical zoom range for landscape, portrait, and street photography. While both lenses offer versatility, the Canon lens is more specialized for long-range photography, whereas the Sigma caters to a wider range of casual shooting scenarios.

Price Comparison

The Canon RF100-500mm is priced at $2,898.95, making it significantly more expensive than the Sigma 28-70mm, which retails for $859.95. This establishes a price difference of about 238%, meaning the Canon lens is more than twice as expensive as the Sigma lens. For photographers on a tight budget or those who do not require super-telephoto capabilities, the Sigma offers a more economical choice without sacrificing too much in terms of quality.

User Experience and Handling

Handling experience varies greatly between the two lenses. The Canon RF100-500mm, while being a robust super-telephoto lens, is heavier and may require more effort to maneuver during extended shooting sessions. Its design is optimized for performance in the field, which may appeal to professional photographers. The Sigma 28-70mm, being lightweight and compact, is designed for everyday shooting, making it comfortable for long periods of use. This difference in handling can significantly influence a photographer's choice based on their intended use.

Availability and Popularity

Both lenses are available for purchase, with the Canon RF100-500mm likely appealing to a more specialized market of wildlife and sports photographers. The Sigma 28-70mm, on the other hand, is targeted towards general photographers who need a reliable all-around lens. While there is no specific sales rank data provided, the price and target user base suggest that the Sigma may be more accessible for casual photographers.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Canon RF100-500mm and the Sigma 28-70mm ultimately hinges on your photography needs. If you require a high-performance telephoto lens for wildlife or sports photography and are prepared to invest significantly, the Canon lens is an excellent choice. Conversely, if you're looking for a versatile, budget-friendly lens for everyday photography, the Sigma lens stands out as an attractive option. Consider your shooting style and budget before making a decision, as each lens excels in its respective domain.