vsversusfinder

Canon RF100- vs Tamron 35-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100- leads on zoom range and weight.

The Canon RF100-500mm offers superior optical performance and build quality, making it ideal for professional use, while the Tamron 35-150mm provides excellent versatility at a more accessible price.

Why Canon RF100- is better

Optical Performance

Canon excels in long-distance photography.

Build Quality

Canon's weather-resistant design is superior.

Zoom Range

Canon offers a longer zoom range for distant subjects.

Why Tamron 35- is better

Price

Tamron is significantly more affordable.

Weight

Tamron is lighter and more portable.

Aperture

Tamron has a faster maximum aperture.

Overall score

Canon RF100-
88
Tamron 35-
76

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100-Tamron 35-
Optical StabilizationYesNo
Autofocus TypeDual Nano USMVXD Linear
Weather SealingYesNo
Max ApertureF4.5-7.1F2-2.8
Focal Length100-500mm35-150mm

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100-Tamron 35-

Introduction to the Lenses

When comparing the Canon RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM Lens with the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD, it’s essential to understand their distinct functionalities and design philosophies. The Canon lens is priced at $2,898.95, making it a significant investment for photographers needing a super-telephoto zoom lens. In contrast, the Tamron lens comes in at $1,499.00, which is about 48% less expensive, thus appealing to a broader range of enthusiasts and professionals.

Optical Performance

The Canon RF100-500mm excels in optical performance with its versatile zoom range, ideal for sports, wildlife, and aviation photography. Its optical image stabilization offers up to 5 stops of shake correction, enhancing image quality significantly when shooting in challenging conditions. On the other hand, the Tamron 35-150mm provides outstanding optical performance throughout its zoom range, catering well to travel and portrait photography. Its fast aperture of F2-2.8 allows for impressive low-light performance and beautiful bokeh, effectively making it a versatile choice for various shooting scenarios.

Autofocus Capabilities

In terms of autofocus, the Canon RF100-500mm features high-speed, smooth, and quiet autofocus due to its Dual Nano USM technology, which is particularly advantageous in wildlife photography where silence is key. Conversely, the Tamron 35-150mm utilizes a VXD linear motor for high-speed and high-precision autofocus, making it equally adept for dynamic portraits and travel photography. Both lenses emphasize quick and reliable autofocus, but the Canon’s system is tailored for longer distances and fast-moving subjects, while the Tamron is designed for versatility across different environments.

Build Quality and Design

The Canon RF100-500mm is designed with a focus on durability, featuring L-series construction that includes weather and dust resistance, making it suitable for outdoor shooting in diverse conditions. Its fluorine-coated elements enhance protection against dirt and moisture. In comparison, the Tamron 35-150mm is slightly more compact at 6.2 inches long and weighs 41.1 oz, making it a more portable option for travel photographers. While both lenses are built to withstand professional use, the Canon lens is particularly robust for extreme conditions.

Versatility in Use

The Canon RF100-500mm's zoom range from 100mm to 500mm provides extensive versatility for photographers who need to capture distant subjects without being intrusive. This makes it particularly useful for wildlife and sports photography. The Tamron 35-150mm, with its focal length range, is more suited for events and portraiture, allowing seamless transitions from wide-angle to telephoto shots. Thus, while the Canon lens is a powerhouse for long-distance shooting, the Tamron lens offers flexibility for various photography styles.

Price Comparison

The Canon RF100-500mm comes with a price tag of $2,898.95, while the Tamron 35-150mm is priced at $1,499.00. This means the Canon lens is about 93% more expensive than the Tamron lens. For those on a budget or who are just starting, this price difference can be significant, making the Tamron a more appealing choice for a range of users. However, serious photographers may justify the investment in the Canon lens for its advanced features and capabilities.

Target User

The Canon RF100-500mm is best suited for professional photographers or serious enthusiasts focusing on wildlife, sports, or aviation photography, where long focal lengths are essential. Its advanced features and high price point reflect its target demographic. In contrast, the Tamron 35-150mm caters to a broader audience, including travel photographers and those who require a quick-change lens for various shooting situations without the need to carry multiple lenses. This lens is ideal for those looking for high-quality results without the hefty investment.

Which should you buy?

In deciding between the Canon RF100-500mm and the Tamron 35-150mm, consider your photography needs and budget. If you're focused on wildlife or sports photography and require a long reach with exceptional optical performance, the Canon lens is worth the investment. However, if you're a travel photographer or need versatility for portrait and event shooting, the Tamron lens offers excellent value and functionality at a significantly lower price. Ultimately, your choice should align with your specific photography style and financial considerations.