Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, Medium vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, Medium wins on macro and price, Fujifilm Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens wins on weight and versatility.
The Canon RF100mm excels in macro photography and offers better value, while the Fujinon XF16-55mm provides versatility and weather resistance.
Why Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, Medium is better
Price
Canon is approximately 11% cheaper.
Macro Capability
Canon specializes in macro photography with 1.4x magnification.
Image Quality
Canon features Spherical Aberration Control for enhanced bokeh.
Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens is better
Versatility
Fujinon is a hybrid lens suitable for various photography styles.
Weight
Fujinon is approximately 37% lighter than its predecessor.
Weather Resistance
Fujinon is designed to withstand various environmental conditions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, Medium | Fujifilm Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Focal Length | 100mm | 16-55mm |
| Magnification | 1.4x | N/A |
| Stabilization | Hybrid IS | N/A |
| Weatherproof | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview
In this comparison, we will examine the Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens and the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens. Both lenses cater to different photography needs, with the Canon lens specializing in macro photography and the Fujinon lens offering versatility for both photography and videography. The Canon RF100mm is priced at $1248.95, while the Fujinon XF16-55mm comes in at $1399.00, making the Canon about 11% cheaper.
Design and Build Quality
The Canon RF100mm F2.8 boasts a robust design tailored for full-frame EOS R series cameras, emphasizing macro photography. Its construction supports a maximum magnification of 1.4x, which is crucial for capturing intricate details. On the other hand, the Fujinon XF16-55mm is designed to be lightweight and portable, weighing just 410g (0.90 lbs), which is approximately 37% lighter than its predecessor. This makes it an excellent choice for photographers on the go, but it may not offer the same level of macro capability as the Canon lens.
Aperture and Image Quality
Both lenses feature a constant aperture of f/2.8, enabling great performance in low-light conditions. However, the Canon lens provides high image quality with its specific design for macro shots, allowing for beautiful background blur and sharp detail. The Canon lens includes a Spherical Aberration Control Ring, which allows photographers to manipulate the bokeh effect, enhancing artistic expression. Meanwhile, the Fujinon lens employs super extra-low dispersion (ED) and aspherical lens elements to deliver outstanding clarity and rounded bokeh, making it a strong contender for general photography and videography.
Autofocus Performance
The Canon RF100mm features fast and highly-precise autofocus, essential for capturing fleeting moments in macro photography. Its hybrid image stabilization (IS) compensates for angular and shift camera shake, ensuring stable shots even in challenging conditions. Conversely, the Fujinon XF16-55mm includes an advanced near-silent linear autofocus motor that enhances the shooting experience, particularly in video mode. While both lenses provide excellent autofocus capabilities, the Canon lens shines in the context of macro photography where precision is crucial.
Versatility and Use Cases
The Fujinon XF16-55mm is marketed as a hybrid lens suitable for both photographers and videographers. Its range from 16mm to 55mm provides versatility for various shooting scenarios, from landscapes to portraits. This makes it an ideal all-around lens for those who may need to switch between different types of photography. In contrast, the Canon RF100mm is specialized for macro and portrait photography, focusing on providing superb close-up imagery. If your primary interest lies in macro work or portrait photography, the Canon may be the better option.
Weather Resistance
When it comes to durability, the Fujinon XF16-55mm lens is ruggedly designed with weather resistance, making it suitable for use in various environmental conditions. This feature allows photographers to shoot outdoors without worrying about light rain or dust. The Canon RF100mm, while well-built, does not specifically highlight weather resistance features in its description. For outdoor photographers who frequently encounter unpredictable weather, the Fujinon lens offers a clear advantage.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF100mm is priced at $1248.95, while the Fujinon XF16-55mm is slightly more expensive at $1399.00. This price difference of approximately $150 means that the Canon lens is about 11% more affordable. For those on a budget or looking for specialized macro capabilities without breaking the bank, the Canon provides exceptional value. On the other hand, if you are looking for a versatile lens for various photography styles and don’t mind spending extra, the Fujinon lens might justify its higher price.
Conclusion
When choosing between the Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens and the Fujinon XF16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II Lens, your decision should depend on your specific photography needs. If macro photography and portrait work are your main interests, the Canon lens excels with its specialized features, image quality, and lower price point. However, if versatility and ruggedness for varied shooting conditions are more important to you, the Fujinon lens stands out as a strong all-rounder.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF100mm and the Fujinon XF16-55mm boils down to your photography style. For enthusiasts focused on macro and portrait photography, the Canon RF100mm is the superior option, providing excellent performance at a more attractive price. Conversely, if you require a versatile lens that can handle a variety of shooting scenarios with added weather resistance, the Fujinon XF16-55mm may be the better fit.

