vsversusfinder

Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, Medium vs Tamron 150-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, Medium wins on magnification and stabilization, Tamron 150- wins on focal range and max aperture.

The Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro excels in macro photography with superior low-light performance, while the Tamron 150-500mm offers versatility for various shooting scenarios. Choose based on your specific photography needs.

Why Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, Medium is better

Macro Performance

Superior low-light performance and macro capabilities.

Image Stabilization

Optical image stabilizer with up to 5 stops of shake correction.

Bokeh Control

SA Control Ring for creative bokeh adjustments.

Why Tamron 150- is better

Versatility

Broad focal range from 150mm to 500mm.

Compact Size

Lightweight and portable design.

Price

More economical option at $1,199.

Overall score

Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, Medium
88
Tamron 150-
84

Specifications

SpecCanon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, MediumTamron 150-
AutofocusFast and preciseHigh-speed linear motor
Image QualityHigh with f/2.8Excellent edge-to-edge
Weather ResistanceYesYes
Bokeh ControlSA Control RingNone
Price$1248.95$1199.00

Dimension comparison

Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is USM Lens, MediumTamron 150-

Overview of the Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro and Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7

The Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is priced at $1,248.95, while the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 costs $1,199.00, making it about 4% cheaper than the Canon lens. Both lenses target different photography needs, with the Canon focusing on macro and portrait photography, and the Tamron serving as a versatile super-telephoto zoom. Understanding their unique features can help photographers make an informed choice based on their specific requirements.

Intended Use and Versatility

The Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is designed for macro and portrait photography, offering a maximum magnification of 1.4x, which is essential for capturing fine details in close-up shots. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 is a super-telephoto lens that provides a broad focal range from 150mm to 500mm, making it ideal for wildlife and sports photography. This versatility allows the Tamron lens to be used in various shooting scenarios, accommodating both wide landscape shots and dramatic close-ups, especially at 500mm.

Image Quality

Canon's RF100mm F2.8 L Macro boasts high image quality with a bright fixed aperture of f/2.8, which excels in low-light conditions and creates beautiful background blur. Its optical image stabilizer provides up to five stops of shake correction, enhancing image stability during macro shooting. On the other hand, the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 emphasizes edge-to-edge sharpness and aberration control, thanks in part to its BBAR-G2 coating. While the Canon lens may deliver superior low-light performance, the Tamron offers excellent clarity throughout its zoom range.

Autofocus Performance

The Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro features fast and precise autofocus, which is crucial for capturing fleeting moments in macro and portrait photography. Its Hybrid IS compensates for angular and shift camera shake, ensuring sharp images. The Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 also includes a high-speed linear motor autofocus mechanism, allowing for quick focusing, particularly beneficial in dynamic shooting situations like wildlife photography. While both lenses offer strong autofocus capabilities, the Canon's design is more tailored for macro applications.

Build Quality and Design

The Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is designed specifically for full-frame EOS R series cameras, emphasizing a robust build quality that is standard for Canon's L-series lenses. Its features, like an SA Control Ring for bokeh adjustments, enhance creative control. Conversely, the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 is notable for its compact size, measuring just 8.4 inches and extending to 11.3 inches when zoomed out. Both lenses include weather-resistant construction, making them suitable for outdoor photography, although Tamron’s lightweight design may appeal to photographers seeking portability.

Price Comparison

The Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro is priced at $1,248.95, while the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 comes in at $1,199.00. This price difference of $49 places the Tamron lens about 4% cheaper than the Canon option. For photographers on a budget or looking for a lens that offers greater focal flexibility, the Tamron may present a more economical choice without sacrificing quality.

Creative Potential

The Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro lens allows for creative exploration with its unique features, such as the SA Control Ring, which lets photographers adjust the shape and character of the bokeh. This capability can significantly enhance the aesthetic quality of macro shots and portraits. The Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7, while less specialized in terms of creative bokeh control, provides the opportunity for spontaneous shooting in a super-telephoto range, allowing users to capture distant subjects with clarity and ease.

Customer Considerations

When considering customer preferences, the Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro may appeal more to those focused on macro and portrait photography due to its specialized features and superior low-light performance. However, the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 offers more flexibility and a broader range of applications, which can be attractive for wildlife and sports photographers. Each lens has its strengths and caters to different types of photography, making the choice dependent on the photographer's primary focus.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF100mm F2.8 L Macro and the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you prioritize macro and portrait photography, the Canon lens offers unique features and exceptional image quality, albeit at a higher price. However, if versatility and a broader focal range are essential for your shooting style, the Tamron lens provides excellent value and performance at a lower price point. Each lens has its unique advantages, making your decision a reflection of your specific photographic goals.