Canon RF24- vs Nikon 55-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- wins on macro and stabilization, Nikon 55- wins on price.
The Canon RF24-105mm offers superior features and versatility, making it the better choice for serious photographers. However, the Nikon 55-200mm is a budget-friendly option for those focused on long-range shots.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Image Stabilization
Canon offers up to 5 stops of shake correction.
Macro Capabilities
Canon has a maximum magnification of 0.5x.
Versatility
Canon's zoom range is more suitable for various photography styles.
Why Nikon 55- is better
Price
Nikon is significantly cheaper at $135.
Weight
Nikon weighs only 9 ounces.
Bulk Packaging
Nikon comes in bulk packaging, appealing to budget buyers.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF24- | Nikon 55- |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | F4-7.1 | F4-5.6 |
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 55-200mm |
| Minimum Focus | 0.43 ft | 3.6 ft |
| Autofocus | STM | SWM |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 is STM and Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 is STM is priced at $459.00, while the Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR is significantly lower at $135.00. This price difference of about 70% positions the Nikon as a more budget-friendly option for photographers. However, the choice between these two lenses extends beyond just their prices, as they offer different features tailored to distinct photography needs.
Build and Design
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 is STM is recognized for its compact and lightweight design, making it an ideal travel companion for photographers on the go. In contrast, the Nikon 55-200mm lens also boasts a lightweight design at just 9 ounces, measuring 2.7 inches in diameter and 3.1 inches long. While both lenses are designed for ease of use, the Canon lens offers a versatile zoom range of 24-105mm, compared to the Nikon's range of 55-200mm. This difference in zoom capability may influence the type of photography you pursue, with the Canon lens being more suitable for landscapes and portraits, while the Nikon excels in long-range shots.
Image Stabilization
Image stabilization is a critical feature in both lenses, but the Canon RF24-105mm stands out with its optical image stabilization that provides up to 5 stops of shake correction. This capability is particularly beneficial for capturing sharp images in low-light situations or while shooting handheld. The Nikon 55-200mm also features Vibration Reduction, but the extent of stabilization is not specified. Consequently, the Canon lens may give users greater confidence in achieving clear shots under varying conditions.
Autofocus Performance
When it comes to autofocus, the Canon RF24-105mm utilizes a leadscrew-type STM motor, allowing for smooth and efficient autofocusing, which is crucial for capturing fast-moving subjects. The Nikon 55-200mm features a Silent Wave Motor that enables quick and quiet high-speed autofocusing as well. Both lenses provide excellent autofocus performance, but the Canon's STM motor may offer a slight edge in smoothness, which is essential for video recording as well as photography.
Macro Capabilities
The Canon RF24-105mm excels in macro photography, offering a maximum magnification of 0.5x with a minimum focusing distance of just 0.43 feet when using Center Focus Macro. This feature allows photographers to capture intricate details in close-up shots, making it an excellent choice for macro enthusiasts. In contrast, the Nikon 55-200mm focuses at a minimum distance of 3.6 feet, limiting its macro capabilities. Therefore, if macro photography is important to you, the Canon lens is the clear winner in this category.
Versatility and Usage
The versatility of the Canon RF24-105mm is highlighted by its zoom range and features, making it suitable for various photography genres including landscapes, portraits, and travel. The lens’s control ring facilitates quick adjustments to settings, enhancing user experience. The Nikon 55-200mm, while also versatile, is more specialized for portraiture and wildlife due to its longer focal length. This distinction in usage scenarios can greatly affect your decision based on the types of photography you engage in most frequently.
Warranty and Packaging
Both lenses come with a warranty, which is a common practice to ensure customer satisfaction and product reliability. The Nikon 55-200mm is offered in bulk packaging, which may appeal to budget-conscious buyers, while the Canon RF24-105mm's premium packaging and features cater to those looking for more than just the basic lens. This difference in packaging could influence perceptions of value and professionalism when choosing between these two options.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 is STM and the Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR ultimately hinges on your photography needs and budget. The Canon lens, priced at $459.00, offers superior image stabilization, better macro capabilities, and a versatile zoom range, making it ideal for a wide array of photography styles. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option, the Nikon lens at $135.00 delivers good performance for longer-range photography, though it lacks some of the advanced features of the Canon. Depending on your priorities, either lens could be the perfect fit for your camera kit.

