Canon RF24- vs Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- wins on stabilization and focusing, Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- wins on weight and size.
The Canon RF24-105mm offers superior versatility and image stabilization, while the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR provides excellent telephoto capabilities at a lower price.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Image Stabilization
Canon compensates for up to 5 stops of shake.
Versatility
Canon covers a zoom range of 24-105mm.
Macro Capability
Canon allows focusing as close as 0.43 feet.
Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- is better
Price
Nikon is $205 cheaper.
Telephoto Range
Nikon offers a longer focal length of 55-300mm.
Refurbished Warranty
Nikon comes with a 90-day warranty.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF24- | Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $459.00 | $254.00 |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x | 0.3x |
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 55-300mm |
| Stabilization Type | Optical | VR II |
| Autofocus Motor | STM | SWM |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 is STM
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 is STM lens is a versatile option for photographers, priced at $459.00. This lens features a compact and lightweight design, making it an attractive choice for travel and outdoor photography. It boasts a zoom range of 24-105mm, allowing users to capture a variety of subjects, from landscapes to portraits. The lens also includes optical image stabilization, which compensates for up to 5 stops of shake, ensuring steady shots even in challenging conditions.
Its macro capabilities are impressive, with a maximum magnification of 0.5x when using Center Focus Macro. This feature allows photographers to get as close as 0.43 feet from their subject, making it ideal for detailed shots of small objects. The RF24-105mm is designed with a leadscrew-type STM motor for smooth autofocus, enhancing the overall shooting experience.
Overview of the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED is a more affordable option at $254.00, making it about 45% cheaper than the Canon lens. This telephoto zoom lens offers a significant focal length range of 55-300mm, which is equivalent to 82.5 to 450mm in a full-frame format. With this extended range, it is excellent for capturing distant subjects, such as at sporting events or wildlife photography.
This lens features Nikon's VR II image stabilization, which allows for handheld shooting at up to 4 shutter speeds slower than would typically be possible. Additionally, it includes a Silent Wave Motor (SWM) for quiet and fast autofocus, making it suitable for capturing spontaneous moments without disturbing the scene. The combination of a high refractive index lens element and two extra-low dispersion elements effectively minimizes chromatic aberration, ensuring high-quality images.
Image Stabilization Capabilities
Both lenses offer image stabilization, but they differ in their effectiveness and technology. The Canon RF24-105mm features optical image stabilization that compensates for up to 5 stops of shake, which is slightly superior to the Nikon's VR II stabilization that allows shooting at up to 4 stops slower. This means that in situations where camera shake is a concern, the Canon lens may provide better results, especially in low-light conditions.
However, the Nikon lens is equipped with a tripod detection mode, which can help reduce vibrations when the lens is mounted on a tripod. This feature can be beneficial for photographers who often shoot in stationary settings, such as landscapes or studio work. Overall, while both lenses aim to minimize shake and improve image quality, the Canon lens has a slight edge in stabilization performance.
Focusing Mechanisms
When it comes to focusing mechanisms, both lenses utilize advanced technologies to enhance user experience. The Canon RF24-105mm employs a leadscrew-type STM motor, which enables smooth and quiet autofocus during both still photography and video shooting. This is particularly useful for videographers who need to maintain audio clarity while focusing.
Conversely, the Nikon lens features a Silent Wave Motor (SWM), which also provides fast and quiet autofocus. While both systems are designed to minimize focus noise, the Canon’s STM motor is often praised for its smooth performance in video applications, making it a more attractive option for hybrid shooters. In terms of focusing speed, both lenses perform well, but the choice may ultimately depend on the specific needs of the user.
Build Quality and Portability
The Canon RF24-105mm is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it a suitable choice for photographers who prioritize portability. This lens weighs less than many competitors in its category, allowing for easier handling during extended shooting sessions. Its build quality is also robust, ensuring durability while maintaining the lightweight design.
In comparison, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm, while still relatively light, is slightly bulkier due to its extended zoom range. However, its construction includes a high refractive index lens element and extra-low dispersion elements, which contribute to its optical quality. This lens is also noted for being a factory refurbished product, which implies it has undergone rigorous testing and comes with a 90-day warranty, adding value to its purchase.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two lenses is significant. The Canon RF24-105mm is priced at $459.00, while the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR is available for $254.00. This makes the Nikon lens about $205 cheaper, which could be a decisive factor for budget-conscious photographers.
While the Canon lens justifies its higher price with advanced features and superior image stabilization, the Nikon lens offers great value for those who need a longer focal length at a lower cost. Both lenses cater to different segments of the market, making the decision heavily reliant on the user’s budget and specific needs.
Versatility and Intended Use
The Canon RF24-105mm is known for its versatility, making it suitable for a wide range of photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and macro photography. Its broad zoom range coupled with the ability to focus closely allows users to adapt to various shooting conditions effortlessly.
On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm is tailored for those interested in telephoto photography. Its extended range is ideal for capturing distant subjects, making it perfect for sports events, wildlife, and travel photography. While it may not offer the same close-up capabilities as the Canon lens, its longer reach provides unique opportunities for different types of photography.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 is STM and the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED ultimately depends on your photography needs and budget. If you seek versatility and superior image stabilization, the Canon lens is an excellent investment, albeit at a higher price. However, if you're looking for a more affordable option that excels in telephoto capabilities, the Nikon lens offers great value for its price. Consider what subjects you'll be photographing most frequently to make the best decision for your photography toolkit.

