Canon RF24- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- leads on price and zoom range.
The Canon RF24-105mm offers versatility and macro capabilities, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm excels in low-light performance and affordability.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Versatility
Canon's zoom range of 24-105mm allows for more diverse shooting options.
Macro Capabilities
Canon offers a maximum magnification of 0.5x for detailed close-ups.
Image Stabilization
Canon features optical image stabilization with up to 5 stops of shake correction.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better
Price
Nikon is priced at $276.95, making it more affordable.
Low-Light Performance
Nikon's f/2 aperture provides better low-light capabilities.
Bokeh Effect
Nikon's 9-blade diaphragm enhances background blur.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF24- | Nikon NIKKOR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Nikon |
| Max Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/2 |
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 40mm |
| Weight | 1 lb | 0.8 lb |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF24-105mm and Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM is priced at $459.00, offering a versatile zoom range, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is available for $276.95, making it about 17% cheaper. Both lenses cater to specific photographic needs, with the Canon lens providing a broader zoom capability and the Nikon lens delivering a fast prime option. This overview highlights their respective strengths based on their specifications and intended uses.
Design and Build Quality
The Canon RF24-105mm is designed as a compact and lightweight zoom lens, making it suitable for a variety of shooting situations, including landscapes and portraits. It boasts a high-quality build that emphasizes versatility. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2, also compact and lightweight, excels in the prime lens category, offering a solid construction tailored for street photography and candid shots. Both lenses prioritize portability, but the Canon's zoom range may appeal to those who prefer flexibility in framing their shots.
Image Stabilization and Autofocus
The Canon RF24-105mm features optical image stabilization with up to 5 stops of shake correction, which is beneficial for low-light situations and shooting at slower shutter speeds. This is paired with a leadscrew-type STM motor that ensures smooth autofocusing, enhancing video recording capabilities. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 also includes a fast and quiet autofocus system designed to suppress focus breathing, making it ideal for video work as well. While both lenses excel in autofocus performance, the added stabilization in the Canon lens may give it an edge for handheld photography.
Maximum Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 has a maximum aperture of f/2, allowing for excellent low-light performance and the ability to achieve a shallow depth of field. This feature enhances the bokeh effect, thanks to its 9 rounded blade diaphragm. In contrast, the Canon RF24-105mm has a variable maximum aperture ranging from f/4 to f/7.1, which can limit its effectiveness in low-light situations compared to the Nikon. For photographers prioritizing low-light performance and background blur, the Nikon lens is likely the better option.
Versatility and Focal Length Range
With a focal length range of 24-105mm, the Canon RF24-105mm offers significant versatility, allowing photographers to capture a wide array of subjects without changing lenses. This zoom lens is ideal for those who want to cover multiple scenarios, from wide-angle landscapes to close-up portraits. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is a prime lens with a fixed focal length. While it provides excellent image quality and a natural perspective, it may require more lens changes for varied compositions. If versatility is key, the Canon lens stands out; however, for specific creative shots, the Nikon can shine.
Macro Capabilities
The Canon RF24-105mm also excels in macro photography, offering a maximum magnification of 0.5x when using Center Focus Macro and a minimum focusing distance of 0.43 ft. This capability allows for detailed close-up shots, making it appealing for macro enthusiasts. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2, while not specifically highlighted for macro photography, does offer close focusing capabilities, but it does not match the magnification potential of the Canon. For photographers interested in capturing intricate details, the Canon lens provides a significant advantage.
Control Features and Customization
Both lenses feature customizable control rings. The Canon RF24-105mm allows for quick setting changes like shutter speed and aperture, enhancing user convenience. Meanwhile, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2’s control ring can be customized for precise manual focusing or adjustments to aperture, ISO, or exposure compensation. While both lenses offer beneficial control features, the Canon lens may appeal more to those who frequently adjust settings on the fly, whereas the Nikon's focus on precise control may be preferred by those who prioritize manual shooting.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 ultimately depends on your photographic needs. If you require versatility, macro capabilities, and enhanced stabilization, the Canon lens may be the best fit, albeit at a higher price of $459.00. Conversely, if you seek an affordable, lightweight option with excellent low-light performance and bokeh, the Nikon lens at $276.95 is a compelling choice. Assess your shooting style and prioritize the features that align with your creative vision to make the best decision.

