Canon RF24- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z MC
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- wins on zoom range, Nikon NIKKOR Z MC wins on price and weight.
The Canon RF24-105mm offers versatility at a lower price, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm excels in macro photography with superior image quality.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $459.
Versatility
Canon has a broader zoom range for various photography styles.
Weight
Canon is lighter and more compact for travel.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z MC is better
Image Quality
Nikon offers superior sharpness and clarity for macro shots.
Aperture
Nikon has a brighter f/2.8 maximum aperture.
Weather Sealing
Nikon is weather sealed for outdoor use.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF24- | Nikon NIKKOR Z MC |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 105mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x | 1:1 |
| Stabilization | 5 Stops | VR |
| Minimum Focus | 0.43 ft | 0.31 ft |
| Weight | 1.48 lbs | 1.76 lbs |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM is an excellent all-around lens designed for versatility. Priced at $459.00, it is a compact and lightweight option that offers a zoom range from 24mm to 105mm, making it suitable for various photography styles, including landscapes and portraits. Its impressive features include optical image stabilization that provides up to 5 stops of shake correction, ensuring steady images even in challenging conditions. Additionally, it boasts a maximum magnification of 0.5x with a minimum focusing distance of 0.43 feet in macro mode, allowing users to capture fine details up close.
Overview of the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
The Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S is a professional macro lens priced significantly higher at $1,046.95. This lens excels in capturing intricate details with a true 1:1 magnification, making it ideal for macro photography. Its advanced optical design achieves high levels of sharpness and clarity, with virtually no distortion. Furthermore, the lens features a bright f/2.8 maximum aperture, allowing for excellent performance in various lighting conditions and creating beautifully blurred backgrounds. The Nikon lens also incorporates Vibration Reduction (VR) technology to minimize camera blur, enhancing its handheld shooting capabilities.
Image Quality Comparison
In terms of image quality, the Nikon lens is designed specifically for macro photography, offering a superior optical design that provides high levels of sharpness, contrast, and clarity. Its advanced S-Line optics aim to eliminate distortion and aberrations, ensuring that photographers capture intricate details with precision. The Canon lens, while versatile, does not match the specialized optics of the Nikon for macro purposes, although it does offer decent image quality across its zoom range. Therefore, for those focused on capturing detailed macro shots, the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S is the clear choice.
Focusing and Stabilization Features
Both lenses feature impressive autofocus systems and stabilization technologies. The Canon RF24-105mm includes a leadscrew-type STM motor that enables smooth and quiet autofocusing, complemented by its optical image stabilization that corrects shake by up to 5 stops. In contrast, the Nikon lens's Vibration Reduction (VR) system is specifically engineered for handheld shooting, particularly beneficial for macro and portrait photography. While both lenses ensure steady images, the Nikon's stabilization system may offer further advantages in low-light conditions or when shooting at longer focal lengths.
Versatility in Usage
When it comes to versatility, the Canon RF24-105mm shines due to its extensive zoom range, making it suitable for various styles of photography from landscapes to portraits and even macro shots. Its lightweight and compact design make it an ideal travel companion. Conversely, the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm, with its fixed focal length of 105mm, is more specialized. While it excels in macro and portrait photography, it may not be as adaptable for other genres, limiting its versatility compared to the Canon lens. Photographers who prefer a single lens for multiple situations may lean towards the Canon option.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
The Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm lens features weather sealing, which provides added protection against moisture and dust, making it a more reliable choice for outdoor shooting in varying conditions. The Canon RF24-105mm, while constructed with care, does not emphasize weather sealing in its design. This distinction can be crucial for photographers who often shoot in challenging environments. The added durability of the Nikon lens may justify its higher price for those who require robust performance in all weather scenarios.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two lenses is significant, with the Canon RF24-105mm priced at $459.00, making it about 56% cheaper than the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm at $1,046.95. For photographers on a budget or those who need a versatile lens without breaking the bank, the Canon option presents a much more accessible choice. However, one must consider the performance and specialized features of the Nikon lens, which may be worth the investment for serious macro photographers.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM and the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you seek versatility and a budget-friendly option, the Canon lens is an excellent choice, providing decent macro capabilities alongside a broader zoom range. However, if your focus is primarily on macro photography and you require superior image quality and advanced features, the Nikon lens justifies its higher price with its specialized design and capabilities.

