Canon RF24- vs OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- wins on stabilization and autofocus, OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- wins on price and weight.
The Canon RF24-105mm offers superior versatility and optical performance, making it the better choice for serious photographers. However, the Olympus lens is a budget-friendly option with solid performance.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Optical Stabilization
Canon lens features advanced optical image stabilization.
Versatility
Canon lens has a broader zoom range of 24-105mm.
Autofocus
Canon lens has superior autofocus capabilities.
Why OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- is better
Price
Olympus lens is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Olympus lens is lightweight and portable.
Value
Olympus lens offers good performance for budget users.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF24- | OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 40-150mm |
| Max Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/4-5.6 |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x | 0.16x |
| Minimum Focus | 0.66 ft | Not specified |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Canon RF24-105mm and OM SYSTEM Olympus 40-150mm Lenses
When comparing the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM and the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R, the price difference is significant. The Canon lens retails for $459.00, while the Olympus lens is priced at $175.99, making it about 62% cheaper. This article will explore key features, usability, and overall performance to help you decide which lens best fits your photography needs.
Design and Portability
The Canon RF24-105mm is compact and lightweight, designed for versatility in various shooting conditions. Weighing much less than many professional-grade lenses, it offers a zoom range of 24-105mm, accommodating everything from landscapes to portraits. In contrast, the OM SYSTEM Olympus lens, also portable, features a 40-150mm focal range, which is excellent for wildlife and sports photography. Although both lenses are designed for ease of handling, the Canon lens’s broader zoom range provides more versatility for different types of photography.
Optical Performance
The optical performance of these lenses is a crucial factor for any photographer. The Canon RF24-105mm boasts optical image stabilization with up to 5 stops of shake correction, which is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in low light conditions. This feature allows you to capture sharp images even with slower shutter speeds. The Olympus lens, while offering a maximum image magnification of 0.16x, lacks advanced stabilization features, which may affect performance in challenging lighting scenarios. Thus, if optical performance is your main concern, the Canon lens has the edge.
Focusing Capabilities
Focusing capabilities can make or break a photographer's experience. The Canon RF24-105mm features a leadscrew-type STM motor, allowing for smooth and silent autofocusing. Additionally, it offers a minimum focusing distance of 0.66 ft, which is advantageous for capturing close-up shots. The Olympus lens employs high-speed imager AF (MSC) but does not specify its focusing distance. The Canon lens's superior autofocus performance can be particularly beneficial for capturing fleeting moments or subjects in motion.
Maximum Aperture and Light Gathering
Maximum aperture plays a vital role in low-light photography. The Canon RF24-105mm has a variable aperture ranging from f/4 to f/7.1, while the Olympus lens offers a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6. This means that the Canon lens will allow less light to enter at its longest focal length, but it still holds a slight advantage in low-light situations compared to the Olympus lens. For photographers who frequently shoot in dim conditions or require shallow depth of field, the Canon lens is the better choice.
Versatility and Use Cases
Versatility is a key aspect of both lenses, but they cater to slightly different photography styles. The Canon RF24-105mm is suitable for a wide variety of situations, from landscapes to portraits, thanks to its extensive zoom range and macro capabilities that allow for impressive close-ups. Meanwhile, the Olympus lens, with its 40-150mm range, is tailored more for sports, wildlife, and portrait photography. If you’re looking for an all-in-one lens for diverse photographic needs, the Canon lens might be more appealing.
Price and Value
The Canon RF24-105mm is priced at $459.00, while the OM SYSTEM Olympus lens is considerably more budget-friendly at $175.99. This difference of about $283.01 highlights a significant price disparity, making the Olympus lens an attractive option for those on a tighter budget. However, it’s essential to weigh this price against the features and performance offered. While the Olympus lens provides excellent value for the price, the Canon lens’s advanced features may justify the higher cost for serious photographers.
User Experience and Reviews
User experience often informs purchasing decisions, and while there are no specific bestseller ranks available for these lenses, both brands are well-regarded in the photography community. The Canon RF24-105mm is celebrated for its exceptional build quality, ease of use, and reliability, making it a popular choice among enthusiasts and professionals alike. The Olympus lens is also praised for its portability and good optical performance, particularly for those using Micro Four Thirds systems. Therefore, both lenses have garnered positive feedback, but user preference may depend on specific photography needs and budget constraints.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM and the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R hinges on your specific requirements as a photographer. If versatility, advanced features like optical image stabilization, and superior autofocus are your priorities, the Canon lens is likely worth the investment. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that still delivers solid performance for everyday photography, the Olympus lens stands out as an excellent choice. Assess your photography style, budget, and intended use to make the best decision for your needs.

