vsversusfinder

Canon RF24- vs Sigma 17-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- wins on stabilization and weight, Sigma 17- wins on aperture and build.

The Canon RF24-105mm offers versatility and value, while the Sigma 17-40mm excels in low-light performance and image quality.

Why Canon RF24- is better

Price

Canon is $459, significantly cheaper than Sigma at $919.

Versatility

Canon's zoom range is more versatile for various photography styles.

Weight

Canon is lighter and more compact for travel.

Why Sigma 17- is better

Aperture

Sigma has a constant F1.8 aperture for better low-light performance.

Optical Quality

Sigma's Art series is known for superior image quality.

Build Quality

Sigma has a more robust construction for professional use.

Overall score

Canon RF24-
75
Sigma 17-
85

Specifications

SpecCanon RF24-Sigma 17-
Focal Length24-105mm17-40mm
Max ApertureF4-7.1F1.8
Min Focus0.66 ftN/A
Image StabilizationYesNo
Brand SeriesRFArt

Dimension comparison

Canon RF24-Sigma 17-

Overview of the Canon RF24-105mm and Sigma 17-40mm

In the realm of camera lenses, the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 is STM offers versatility, while the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC is tailored for low-light performance. The Canon lens is priced at $459.00, making it about 50% cheaper than the Sigma, which retails at $919.00. This price difference reflects the varying capabilities and target audiences of these two lenses, each suited for distinct photographic needs.

Lens Design and Build Quality

The Canon RF24-105mm is a compact and lightweight lens, ideal for photographers who prioritize mobility without sacrificing quality. Its design features a versatile zoom range of 24-105mm, which is perfect for landscapes, portraits, and travel. Conversely, the Sigma 17-40mm is part of Sigma's Art series, known for its professional image quality. While the Sigma lens is heavier due to its robust construction, it excels in providing sharp detail, particularly at its constant F1.8 aperture. This makes the Sigma more suitable for creative depth effects and low-light environments.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The Sigma 17-40mm boasts a bright F1.8 constant aperture, allowing it to perform exceptionally well in low-light conditions. This feature is particularly beneficial for photographers looking to capture stunning images in challenging lighting. In contrast, the Canon RF24-105mm has a maximum aperture range of F4-7.1, making it less capable in low-light situations. This means that while the Canon lens provides versatility in focal length, the Sigma lens offers superior performance when light is limited.

Focusing and Stabilization Features

When it comes to focusing, the Canon RF24-105mm features a leadscrew-type STM motor that enables smooth autofocusing, complemented by optical image stabilization with up to 5 stops of shake correction. This makes it an excellent choice for capturing steady images and videos. On the other hand, the Sigma 17-40mm lacks built-in stabilization but compensates with its bright aperture, which helps achieve faster shutter speeds in low-light settings. This difference can significantly impact the usability of each lens depending on the shooting conditions.

Versatility in Shooting Scenarios

The Canon RF24-105mm shines in its versatility, making it suitable for a wide range of photography styles, including landscapes, portraits, and macro photography. With a minimum focusing distance of 0.66 ft in autofocus mode, it offers a maximum magnification of 0.4x, which adds to its appeal for photographers who enjoy capturing close-up shots. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm is designed specifically for Sony E-mount APS-C cameras, limiting its versatility to portrait, travel, and video applications. This specialization can be a deciding factor for photographers who prioritize certain types of photography.

Price Considerations

The Canon RF24-105mm is priced at $459.00, making it about 50% less expensive than the Sigma 17-40mm, which costs $919.00. This substantial price difference may influence budget-conscious photographers who are looking for high-quality lenses without breaking the bank. The Canon lens provides excellent value for its features, especially for those who require a versatile lens for various shooting situations. For photographers willing to invest more for a premium lens experience, the Sigma may justify its higher price with superior optics and low-light capabilities.

Brand Reputation and Series

Canon and Sigma both have strong brand reputations in the photography world. Canon is known for its user-friendly designs and a wide range of lenses that cater to various skill levels. The RF24-105mm is part of Canon's RF series, which is designed specifically for their mirrorless cameras. Meanwhile, Sigma's Art series, including the 17-40mm, is celebrated for its exceptional optical performance and build quality, appealing to professional photographers seeking precision. Each brand brings its strengths, which can influence a photographer's choice based on their preferences for brand loyalty and specific lens characteristics.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF24-105mm and the Sigma 17-40mm ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you require a versatile lens that excels in various scenarios and offers optical image stabilization, the Canon RF24-105mm at $459.00 is a compelling choice. However, if low-light performance and creative depth effects are your priorities, the Sigma 17-40mm, despite its higher price of $919.00, may be worth the investment. Each lens serves its purpose well, but understanding your shooting style will guide your decision.