Canon RF24- vs SIRUI Night Walker
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- wins on stability and focus, SIRUI Night Walker wins on aperture.
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM excels in versatility and autofocus, while the SIRUI Night Walker 35mm shines in low-light performance and aesthetic design. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Versatility
Canon offers a zoom range of 24-105mm.
Autofocus
Canon features a leadscrew-type STM motor for smooth autofocusing.
Image Stabilization
Canon provides optical image stabilization with up to 5 stops.
Why SIRUI Night Walker is better
Low-Light
SIRUI has a large T1.2 aperture for better low-light performance.
Aesthetic
SIRUI offers a stylish design in classic black and metal gray.
Build Quality
SIRUI features a sturdy aluminum cine housing.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF24- | SIRUI Night Walker |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 35mm |
| Max Aperture | F4-7.1 | T1.2 |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Minimum Focus | 0.66 ft | 0.4m |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM is priced at $459.00, while the SIRUI Night Walker 35mm S35 Manual Focus Cine Lens is priced at $279.00. This makes the SIRUI lens about 39% cheaper than the Canon lens, appealing to those on a tighter budget or looking for a cost-effective option. The significant price difference reflects the distinct purposes of these lenses; the Canon is a versatile zoom lens ideal for various photography styles, whereas the SIRUI is a specialized cine lens designed for filmmakers, particularly in low-light conditions.
Versatility in Use
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM offers a versatile zoom range of 24-105mm, making it suitable for a wide array of photography, including landscapes, portraits, and travel. Its optical image stabilization contributes to clearer images, even in challenging situations. In contrast, the SIRUI Night Walker 35mm is a prime lens suited for specific types of filming, especially documentary and portrait work. With a fixed focal length of 35mm, it allows for precise framing but may limit flexibility compared to the Canon lens. Thus, if versatility is a priority, the Canon lens clearly has the upper hand.
Low-Light Performance
Low-light performance is a critical factor for many photographers and filmmakers. The SIRUI Night Walker boasts a large T1.2 aperture, which is particularly advantageous for shooting in dimly lit environments. This feature allows users to capture clearer images without resorting to high ISO settings, minimizing noise. The Canon lens, with a maximum aperture of F4-7.1, does not offer the same low-light capabilities, making it less effective for nighttime or indoor photography. For filmmakers focused on shooting in low-light situations, the SIRUI lens is the superior choice.
Autofocus Capabilities
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM features a leadscrew-type STM motor that enables smooth autofocusing, making it ideal for both stills and video applications. This autofocus system is particularly beneficial for capturing moving subjects or when quick focus adjustments are needed. On the other hand, the SIRUI Night Walker is a manual focus lens, which requires users to adjust focus manually. While this may appeal to cinematographers looking for precise control over focus, it can be less user-friendly for those accustomed to autofocus systems. Therefore, if ease of use is important, the Canon lens has a distinct advantage.
Build Quality and Design
The build quality of both lenses is commendable, but they serve different purposes. The Canon RF24-105mm is compact and lightweight, designed for ease of use during extended shooting sessions. Its control ring for quick setting changes is an added convenience. Conversely, the SIRUI Night Walker features a sturdy aluminum cine housing, which enhances durability but may add a bit of weight. While both lenses are designed with the user in mind, the choice here will depend on personal preference for sturdiness versus portability.
Image Stabilization
Optical image stabilization is a standout feature of the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM, offering stability with up to 5 stops of shake correction. This is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting, allowing for clearer images even in less-than-ideal conditions. The SIRUI Night Walker does not mention image stabilization, which could pose challenges when shooting handheld or in dynamic environments. For photographers who prioritize image clarity and stability, the Canon lens provides a significant advantage.
Aesthetic and Functional Design
The aesthetic design of the SIRUI Night Walker is appealing, available in classic black and fashionable metal gray, which may attract those who value both functionality and style. The Canon lens, while practical, does not emphasize aesthetics in the same way. Both lenses are designed to be user-friendly, but the SIRUI's sleek design may appeal to filmmakers who consider the visual impact of their equipment as part of their overall production aesthetic.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM and the SIRUI Night Walker 35mm S35 Manual Focus Cine Lens boils down to your specific needs and shooting style. The Canon lens is ideal for those seeking versatility, autofocus capabilities, and effective image stabilization at a higher price point. It excels in a variety of photographic scenarios, making it a great all-around lens. Meanwhile, the SIRUI lens, with its superior low-light performance and aesthetic appeal, is tailored for filmmakers who prioritize manual focus and cinematic quality. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your photographic or filmmaking requirements and budget.

