Canon RF24- vs Tamron 35-

Overview of the Lenses

The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM is significantly cheaper than the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD, priced at $459.00 compared to $1,499.00 for the Tamron. This price difference of about 69% makes the Canon lens an attractive option for budget-conscious photographers. However, the Tamron lens offers a fast aperture of F2-2.8, which can be a game-changer for low-light situations and portrait photography.

Optical Performance

The Tamron 35-150mm lens boasts outstanding optical performance throughout its focal range, which is a key advantage for serious photographers. It is specifically designed to maintain image quality, even at its maximum aperture. In contrast, the Canon RF24-105mm lens provides optical image stabilization with up to 5 stops of shake correction, enhancing the clarity of images taken in various conditions. While both lenses deliver excellent performance, the Tamron's F2-2.8 aperture allows for more creative photographic opportunities, especially in challenging lighting.

Focal Range Versatility

The Canon RF24-105mm lens offers a versatile zoom range of 24-105mm, making it suitable for landscapes, portraits, and various other subjects. On the other hand, the Tamron 35-150mm lens extends its reach from 35mm to 150mm, providing greater flexibility in framing subjects, especially in portrait settings. This extended range allows photographers to capture a variety of compositions without needing to switch lenses frequently, which is ideal for events and travel photography.

Autofocus Capability

Both lenses incorporate advanced autofocus systems, but they cater to different photographic needs. The Canon RF24-105mm features a leadscrew-type STM motor for smooth and quiet autofocusing, making it particularly useful for video recording. The Tamron lens, however, comes equipped with a fast and quiet VXD linear motor designed for high-speed and high-precision autofocus. This capability is especially beneficial for action photography, where quick focusing can make a significant difference in capturing the perfect shot.

Macro Photography Features

The Canon RF24-105mm lens excels in macro photography with a maximum magnification of 0.5x when using Center Focus Macro, enabling users to capture subjects from as close as 0.43 ft. This feature is particularly appealing to macro enthusiasts. The Tamron lens, while not specifically highlighted for macro capabilities, offers a minimum object distance of 13 inches at the wide end, which is commendable but not as impressive as Canon's close-focusing abilities.

Build Quality and Design

The Tamron 35-150mm lens is built to be robust, measuring 6.2 inches in length and weighing 41.1 oz, which may be cumbersome for some users. In contrast, the Canon RF24-105mm lens is compact and lightweight, making it easier to handle and carry during long shoots. The design of the Canon lens also includes a control ring for quick adjustments, enhancing usability for photographers who need to make on-the-fly changes.

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Canon RF24-105mm is priced at $459.00, making it about 69% cheaper than the Tamron 35-150mm, which retails at $1,499.00. This significant price gap could influence a photographer's choice, especially those new to photography or those on a budget. However, the higher price of the Tamron lens may reflect its advanced features, such as the fast aperture and superior autofocus capabilities, which could justify the investment for professional users.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM and the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD largely depends on your photographic needs and budget. If you are looking for a versatile, lightweight lens for general photography and macro work at a budget-friendly price, the Canon RF24-105mm is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize fast aperture and superior autofocus for professional-quality portraits and low-light shooting, the Tamron 35-150mm may be worth the investment despite its higher price. Ultimately, both lenses cater to different styles and requirements, making it essential to consider what features matter most to you.