Canon RF24- vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- wins on zoom and price, VILTROX wins on aperture and weight.
The Canon RF24-105mm offers versatility and portability, while the VILTROX 16mm excels in low-light performance and image quality. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Zoom Range
Versatile 24-105mm zoom range
Portability
Lighter weight for travel
Price
Lower price at $459.00
Why VILTROX is better
Low Light
Superior f/1.8 aperture for low-light shooting
Autofocus
Advanced face and eye recognition autofocus
Image Quality
Exceptional resolution with 12 groups of optical elements
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF24- | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 16mm |
| Max Aperture | f/7.1 | f/1.8 |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus | STM | STM with Eye AF |
| Compatibility | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM lens is a versatile option for photographers seeking a reliable zoom lens. Priced at $459.00, it presents a competitive offering within the camera lens market. This lens features a remarkable zoom range of 24-105mm, making it suitable for various photography styles, including landscapes and portraits. Its optical image stabilization allows for up to five stops of shake correction, which is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in challenging conditions. The lens is compact and lightweight, providing ease of use for photographers on the move.
Overview of the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens
On the other hand, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens is priced at $580.00, making it about 26% more expensive than the Canon lens. This wide-angle prime lens is specifically designed for Nikon Z-mount cameras and features a large f/1.8 aperture, allowing for superior low-light performance. With a 16mm focal length and a 105.6° angle of view, it excels in capturing expansive landscapes and dynamic compositions. It also boasts a fast and precise autofocus system with eye and face recognition, making it suitable for various subjects, including street photography and astrophotography.
Zoom Versus Prime: What’s the Difference?
When comparing zoom and prime lenses, the Canon RF24-105mm offers versatility with its 24-105mm range, allowing users to adapt to different shooting scenarios without changing lenses. In contrast, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 is a prime lens, which typically provides better image quality and wider apertures, but lacks the zoom flexibility. The RF24-105mm’s zoom capability is particularly advantageous for travel photography, while the VILTROX lens's wide-angle perspective is ideal for capturing expansive scenes. Thus, the choice between these lenses largely depends on the photographer's specific needs and shooting style.
Low Light Performance
The VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 excels in low-light scenarios thanks to its large aperture, allowing photographers to shoot in dim conditions without compromising image quality. This is a critical advantage for those who frequently engage in nighttime or indoor photography. In contrast, the Canon RF24-105mm, with its maximum aperture of f/7.1 at full zoom, may struggle in similar conditions. While it does offer some image stabilization, it cannot match the low-light performance capabilities of the VILTROX lens. Photographers prioritizing low-light shooting will find the VILTROX a more suitable choice.
Autofocus Capabilities
Both lenses feature advanced autofocus systems, but the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 includes an STM stepping motor that provides precise and fast autofocus, along with face and eye recognition capabilities. This feature is particularly beneficial for portrait and event photographers who need quick and accurate focus on subjects. The Canon RF24-105mm also has a reliable autofocus system, aided by its leadscrew-type STM motor, but it lacks the face and eye focus recognition that the VILTROX offers. For quick, accurate autofocus in dynamic environments, many might prefer the VILTROX lens.
Build Quality and Portability
In terms of portability, the Canon RF24-105mm is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it an excellent option for those who travel frequently. Weighing less than its VILTROX counterpart, the RF24-105mm allows for easier handling during extended shoots. However, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 is also reasonably portable at 19.9oz, which makes it a good option for photographers who prioritize quality without sacrificing too much weight. Ultimately, both lenses are designed for ease of use, but the Canon lens may offer slightly more convenience for on-the-go photographers.
Versatility in Shooting
The Canon RF24-105mm's zoom range allows users to shoot a variety of subjects without needing to switch lenses, making it an ideal choice for general photography across different settings. Whether capturing portraits, landscapes, or macro shots, this lens provides the flexibility needed for diverse photographic styles. Conversely, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 is more specialized for wide-angle photography, making it less versatile in terms of subject matter but exceptionally effective in its niche. Photographers who desire a multi-purpose lens will likely lean towards the Canon, while those focused on wide compositions may prefer the VILTROX.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM and the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens ultimately depends on your photographic needs. If you require a versatile lens with a broad zoom range and compact design, the Canon RF24-105mm at $459.00 is an excellent option. However, if low-light performance and wide-angle capabilities are your priorities, the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8, despite being priced higher at $580.00, could be the better choice. Each lens has its unique strengths, so consider your shooting style and subject matter when making your decision.

