Canon RF24- vs Viltrox
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF24- wins on macro and stabilization, Viltrox wins on price and weight.
The Canon RF24-105mm offers greater versatility and advanced features, while the Viltrox 35mm excels in low-light performance and portability.
Why Canon RF24- is better
Versatility
Wider zoom range from 24mm to 105mm
Stabilization
Optical image stabilization with up to 5 stops
Macro Capability
Maximum magnification of 0.5x for close-ups
Why Viltrox is better
Weight
Weighs only 170g for easy portability
Low Light
Bright f/1.7 aperture for low-light shooting
Price
Significantly cheaper at $179.00
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF24- | Viltrox |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 35mm |
| Aperture | f/4-7.1 | f/1.7 |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x | N/A |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM
The Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM is a versatile lens that caters to various photography needs, offering a zoom range from 24mm to 105mm. Priced at $459.00, it is designed for those who appreciate flexibility in their lens options. This lens is compact and lightweight, making it easy to handle during long shooting sessions. With its optical image stabilization providing up to 5 stops of shake correction, photographers can achieve clearer images even in challenging conditions. The RF24-105mm is particularly appealing for macro photography, allowing for a maximum magnification of 0.5x with a minimum focusing distance of just 0.43 ft.
Overview of the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E
The Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is a prime lens designed specifically for Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras, available at a more accessible price of $179.00. This lens features a bright f/1.7 maximum aperture, ideal for low-light conditions and offers excellent control over depth of field. Weighing only 170g, it’s lightweight and perfect for travel. Although it has a fixed focal length of 35mm, it excels in portrait, landscape, and street photography, providing a solid option for photographers looking to diversify their creative expression.
Comparison of Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon RF24-105mm offers a wider focal length range compared to the Viltrox 35mm, making it more versatile for different shooting scenarios. The ability to zoom from 24mm to 105mm enables users to capture everything from expansive landscapes to detailed close-ups. In contrast, the Viltrox, with its fixed focal length of 35mm, confines users to a more specific range, primarily suited for portraits and street photography. While the versatility of the Canon lens might justify its higher price, the Viltrox caters well to photographers who prefer simplicity and a lightweight option for everyday use.
Performance in Low Light Conditions
When it comes to low-light performance, the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E has a distinct advantage due to its wide aperture of f/1.7. This feature allows for more light to enter the lens, making it easier to capture sharp images in dimly lit environments. In comparison, the Canon RF24-105mm has a variable maximum aperture of f/4 at the wide end and f/7.1 at the telephoto end, which limits its efficacy in low-light settings. Photographers who frequently work in challenging lighting conditions may find the Viltrox to be a more suitable choice, despite its fixed focal length.
Autofocus and Usability
The Canon RF24-105mm is equipped with a leadscrew-type STM motor that facilitates smooth and quiet autofocus, which is particularly beneficial for both still photography and videography. This feature enhances user experience by ensuring that focus adjustments are nearly silent, making it an excellent choice for capturing video content. The Viltrox 35mm also supports autofocus and is designed to be compatible with various Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras, making it user-friendly. However, the lack of detailed specifications on its autofocus system means that users may want to test its performance in practice to ensure it meets their shooting needs.
Weight and Portability
Weight is a crucial factor for photographers who are often on the move, and here the Viltrox 35mm takes the lead. Weighing only 170g, it is significantly lighter than the Canon RF24-105mm, which, while not specified, can be assumed to be heavier given its zoom capabilities and features. The lightweight design of the Viltrox makes it an ideal companion for travel, allowing photographers to carry it comfortably without feeling burdened. Conversely, the Canon lens, while still compact, may require more consideration regarding portability, especially for extended outdoor shoots.
Price Comparison
There is a considerable price difference between the two lenses, with the Canon RF24-105mm priced at $459.00 and the Viltrox 35mm at $179.00. This means the Viltrox is about 61% cheaper than the Canon lens, making it a budget-friendly option for photographers who may not need the versatility of a zoom lens. The lower price point of the Viltrox does not compromise its quality, as it provides excellent performance for its intended use, while the Canon lens offers a broader range of features justifying its higher cost for dedicated photographers.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Canon RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM and the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E largely depends on your specific photography needs. If you are looking for versatility, a broader zoom range, and advanced features such as optical image stabilization, the Canon lens would be the better investment. However, if you prioritize lightweight portability, excellent low-light performance, and a more budget-friendly option, the Viltrox lens could be the ideal choice. Ultimately, both lenses cater to different styles and preferences, making them suitable for a variety of photographers.

